I’d fuck that building.
I dunno, I bet it’s had thousands of people inside it.
Both looks bad. It’s too many tattoos on one hand, and pretty scrambled a bad looking graffiti on the other hand.
She would look way better without the tats. Even this shitty building would look better without this artless crap. And how is this a political take?
While true…
It ain’t stopping nothing.
That’s just like, your opinion, man.
Donny, please
Comparing women to objects tends to be more frowned upon by civilized people, which excludes the right.
You’re welcome to find whatever you like attractive. She clearly doesn’t care about your opinion.
I’m sure my opinion is as worthless to her as hers is to me. And btw nobody is comparing the woman to the object, the point is that the aesthetic is similar. Applies to all sexes and objects. Imho the building tags are not art, or at least not good art. And her snakes, bugs and Japanese masks are so tired and trite, everyone does the same stuff. Yay.
Sheesh
God damn thats hot. Someone put a lot of work into that building.
Even the building is kinda cool.
I keep looking over the picture of the woman, trying to compare it to whatever the other image is of, and I’m not sure what they’re talking about. I’ve gone over every inch of her body and I don’t know what any of this is about. I’m sorry, what’s going on?
Basically they’re saying the tattoos make her trashy.
I guess I’m still not understanding it. Time to pour over the picture some more, see if we can’t figure it out.
Graffiti is a spectrum: on one hand, you get beautiful murals that add something to the structure, making it more than what it was.
On the other hand, you get dicks and swastikas.
Tattoos are the same way. There’s a difference between someone having a beautiful sleeve done and someone who has TRUMP tattooed on their forehead.
An example to further your point: I have an album of these I took earlier this year. It was exciting to stumble across.
When I click the image, it flips over the X-axis. That’s weird as hell.
Same here, on sync.
There is probably some info in the exif data that is being ignored by one and not the other.
I was stuck at some train tracks in my area, and some of the graffiti on the trains left a gap around the safety information about weight limits and such.
Not all of them did. Those that didn’t had to be painted over and re-written, but only the safety section. They left the rest alone.
There was some mutual acceptance happening on both sides of the effort that warmed my heart.
As a graffiti enthusiast, I can say that is definitely part of “the rules”. Graffiti has a code of conduct, depite it appearing like anarchy. Many new writers are ignorant of it. Don’t tag:
- Personal property
- Places of religion
- Memorials
- Shipping or cargo data (like those train cars)
- Places that are kept clean/painted (it’s going to get covered frequently)
No no, they have a point.
I don’t see any nazi iconography in the image OP posted, can you point them out to me?
I was applying the claim to something else
If you are talking about graffiti on buildings then you haven’t been to Frankfurt if you’ve not seen nazi imagery
Lemmy cannot handle abstract reasoning. If you change the scenario at all to make a point, they shit circuit
If you have to change the scenario to make your point then your point doesn’t belong in this comment section.
We really didn’t need to bring the “criticizing our community in the third person” farce over from reddit. You are Lemmy too, and I suspect you can handle abstract reasoning, yes?
I was applying the claim to something else
What are you applying the claim to?
Why the reference to illegal Nazi iconography in Frankfurt? The building posted looks to me to be in the contiguous US.
You posted an image of a person’s mugshot who has a swastika on their forehead and I assumed you were conflating their tattoos to the person in the original image of this post.
The building is most likely in São Paulo. Not that it matters for for the point you’re making :)
There’s no Portuguese in any of those tags. Three of the tags are east coast crews. If I were to have to put a location down I’d say North East Miami FL.
What are you applying the claim to?
People with nazi tattoos
Why the reference to illegal Nazi iconography in Frankfurt? The building posted looks to me to be in the contiguous US.
I thought you might not have known racist graffiti existed
were conflating their tattoos to the person in the original image of this post.
Oh no, nothing about her. Just the “Tattoos = graffiti, guys” part was applied to the person I posted
Oh ok, sorry for the misunderstanding on my part. Thanks for the clarification.
Why is it always femme people this bullshit is directed at? Why aren’t the hyper masculine tattooed manosphere influencers ever chastised for their jingoistic tribal alt right nazi sigils engraved on their bodies?
Because graffiti is artwork you do on someone else’s property.
And in the maga brain, a man’s body is his own, but a woman’s body…¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I hate that this makes sense
Well considering the common refrain from them recently was the question “What is a woman?” I have no confidence they even understand the concept of a femme body.
I just Googled “anti tattoo meme” and most of them were making fun of macho guys.
misogyny
In a word yes. And also the inherent threat of violence that allows for the patriarchy that precludes misogyny.
I’m sure this was rhetorical… But if not, I think you know why.
I’m more curious as to how multiple different people tagged all like 8 floors of the building. Maybe it’s AI generated?
No, this a local style in Brazil, I think in the city of São Paulo. Look up pixadores. They essentially compete in hitting up crazy spots.
Edit:
trailer toa documentary about this sub culture. It’s pretty fascinating.Maybe it’s AI generated?
Have you ever seen an abandoned building in real life?
I don’t think that building has very nice tits
Agreed. Now look at this building.
I’ve had enough with this sort of edefice shaming.
We all need to be dense housing positive
Sorry but if it’s got no flying buttresses it’s not for me
The tatoos would not stop me.
Tbh if done nice, i think they can even be attractive.
Turn off the lights.
Keep ‘em on, get to read the funnies while bangin’
I mean, it’s a fairly reasonable comparison aside from the fact the building is shitty. Is it political in any sense? I don’t think so.
They don’t understand consent.
Exactly. We never agreed to put that guy in charge of the building; he just inherited it!
