No! Absolutely not! Are you trying to kill us all?!
No! Absolutely not! Are you trying to kill us all?!
That is not always the case, from my experience
Not much, what’s hawk tuah you?
I just cannot fathom this absolutely brainlet, short-term thinking. Yeah, these people have created some of the best content we’ve ever made (according to player feedback). Let’s fucking fire them all!
When did “investing” die and rise as a revenant obsessed with burning down the building to get one more penny? Do billionaires know something we don’t and are burning everything down because the planet’s gonna explode?
He ain’t gon be doin much “sleepin”, na’m’sayin?
He did it once. He did a good thing for his flesh-and-blood child ONE TIME. And regretted it so hard, he started pushing far-right values and amplifying fascist dialogue to counteract it for everyone else’s families.
“I like to look for the good in people.” You’re not looking for good, you’re exacavating it from beneath years and hundreds of anecdotes to the contrary.
…i miss having no responsibilites.
As a billionaire, you’re putting forward 99% of the world as targets first. His life isn’t in any danger from them.
Not even religion, theology. There are grifters and scammers in every field but apparently theology is the one where the goal is just to unrepetantly lie.
A very clear bias on display.
The signs are a fakeout for the lizardpeople scooping your thoughtsponge out via economic taxation.
Just gotta do your research and follow the obvious signs. No, but not those obvious signs.
…the rest of that resume must be absolutely insane. Or he’s applying to be a businessman.
I’m out here with a Master’s degree and 3 years of work experience and I’m not even getting a first call. Shit’s tough out here.
I mean, I assume the actual angle is “yes, this accurate from what I’ve seen (on the other side of the law)”. I assume.
I’ve also never watched one. The only type of these I watch is the British guy from their Royal Armoury who comments on video game guns. On Gamespot(?)'s Youtube, I think
Dude feels like it’s an affront to his “challenging activity” if people have fun confronting (and potentially surmounting) challenges.
Because most people don’t get into real estate to do public good. Most people get into real estate, become landlords, to make money off people’s need for land and housing. It’d be like trying to whitewash criminality because vigilante heroes exist. Yeah, vigilantes might exist and are technically criminals, but that’s not really the core conception of “a criminal”.
As a straight man, the wording in the meme is very literal. I’m not a fan but I’ll allow it.
350,000 young men wasted for a balding bastard’s pride.
Is this a real stance you’re taking or are you just trolling? Explain yourself.
We’re all on the internet, you can look up the actual definition for “strawman” like I just did.
To paraphrase: strawmanning an argument is not so concretely about “putting words in anyone’s mouth”.
It is the process of debating a newly-created stance/position/idea that is easily disproven and visibly flawed when this new position may or may not be related to anything in the pre-existing debate. You don’t have to be ‘responding to anyone’; in fact, it fits more if you are not arguing something that anyone in the debate has referenced before.
You did say doctors were rich. Otherwise, who is “this is just another handout to the wealthy” referring to? And like the other commenter mentioned, doctors aren’t usually the ones setting their own costs.
Oh, dreadfully sorry. Shall I…just stick my neck out here? Or is this going to be a trampling? Let me know.