• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    this was predicted. this is probably how the people who made this happen intended it to be.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a form of class warfare: it isn’t the rich women - they can go out of state or country to get proper medical care if they need it… it’s poor women that are bearing this awful cost.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oddly enough, it’s the poor that are making this happen to themselves by voting for these people. Religion is a hell of a drug.

  • davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’d think this would give republicans pause, or make them reconsider.

    Young women dying in dramatically increasing numbers.

    But it won’t.

    All these young women left to die on the altar of their misinterpretation of their religion and their uncaring principles.

    But no, it was a policy born in hate and the tragic imposed deaths of women are not an unfortunate side effect, they’re just misogyny in action. Working itself out.

    If they cared about babies, there would be more support for women, for early years interventions, and maybe they might also care about children dying in schools on the altar of their misunderstanding of their 2nd amendment and their uncaring principles.

    But no, they don’t care about children dying in schools either, and do you know why? Because caring about children dying in schools doesn’t involve telling women what they have to do and ruling their lives with oppressive freedom-denying laws.

    Caring about children dying in schools would involve some infringement on their UNDENYABLE RIGHT TO FEEL IMPORTANT with a gun and caring about women dying in childbirth would interfere with their UNDENYABLE RIGHT TO FEEL IMPORTANT with a rule about what women can and can’t do.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They were never pro-life. They were never even pro-birth. They’ve never argued for anything like free pre-natal care. If something is wrong with your baby and you and your baby are going to die, that’s god’s will, so don’t you dare get an abortion.

      They are not pro-anything. They’re anti-abortion. That’s as far as it goes whether they admit it or not.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Well then I guess you shuttle have learned to keep your legs shut!”

    • my most angry and outspoken conservative relatives and acquaintances, always bringing the subtlety and shades of grey.
    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the only logical answer for this. Otherwise- their deaths mean nothing.

      • dubious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        the logical answer is something else entirely. definitely don’t hold your breath for the state to make them accountable.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Republicans in power can see in the statistics that more black and brown people are dying, so they don’t care. Less people voting against them.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You risk your own and others situational awareness when you paint everything as a race issue.

      I grew up in Texas in a deep red county.

      They believe abortion is literally the same as killing a healthy 2 year old. Straight up. THAT is the basis for their opposition to abortion, plain and simple.

      You are dumbing down the discourse by being so focused on race.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        “This stops them from killing babies” and “This also predominantly affects the group I don’t like” aren’t mutually exclusive ideas

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They literally don’t care about skin color here. Not one iota. Murder is murder and this is that (to them).

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I grew up in Texas in a deep red county.

            In a country notorious for it’s systemic and institutionalized racism, you grew up in a section that votes predominantly for the party that is notoriously racist ( In general, not in comparison to any other party ) and would claim that race has no part in a decision that is known to have racial divides in applicability.

            That might be the greatest feat of mental gymnastics i’ve ever seen, truly.

            On the off-chance you genuinely mean what you say:

            That you and the people you know don’t care about race is laudable, but it doesn’t seem to be broadly applicable to the rest of the state or country ( and in the case of republicans their party )

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This shouldn’t be hard to believe.

              These are largely white people voting to stop their largely white neighbors from getting abortions.

              Are you under the impression their position toward abortion would be different if the entire state or country were 100% white? I assure you it would not be. And if that’s true, it cannot be based on race.

              What’s more is this argument that their position on abortion is informed by statistics is laughable. These are low information voters. You seriously think they even know the stats? Why in the world would anyone think that?

              • Senal@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Are you under the impression their position toward abortion would be different if the entire state or country were 100% white? I assure you it would not be. And if that’s true, it cannot be based on race.

                I’ve no idea, all i was stating is that dismissing race as a part of the decision making process (consciously or unconsciously) in a place known for outcomes based on race could be considered dumbing down the argument.

                What’s more is this argument that their position on abortion is informed by statistics is laughable. These are low information voters. You seriously think they even know the stats? Why in the world would anyone think that?

                Entirely laughable, which is why nobody has claimed this.

                I was saying these people are what makes up the statistics.


                As an entirely made up example:

                “10% of the population don’t like the taste of potatoes” doesn’t mean 10% of the population base their decisions about eating fries on reading the statistics.

                claims such as “All the people i know like potatoes , so potato preference can’t possibly be related to the amount of fries eaten” just doesnt make any sense.


                and to be clear I’m not claiming all positions are race based, just that it’s enough of a factor that pretending it doesn’t have any impact at all is some gold medal mental gymnastics.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s both. Unfortunately, a lot of people are incredibly racist without even knowing that they are racists. They are just doing whatever they’ve always been doing, “and now, all of a sudden, that’s racist.” It’s like when people are defending slavery because it was “normal at the time.” It was still racist! It is now and it was then.

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Before my comment I want to make clear I agree with the conclusion that abortion bans are clearly killing women at statistically significant rates.

    That said, the stats reporting here doesn’t make sense:

    Among Hispanic women, the rate of women dying while pregnant, during childbirth or soon after increased from 14.5% in 2019 to 18.9% in 2022. Rates among white women nearly doubled — from 20% to 39.1%. And Black women, who historically have higher chances of dying while pregnant, during childbirth or soon after, saw their rates go from 31.6% to 43.6%.

    There’s no way 14.5% of Hispanic women in Texas who got pregnant died some time during pregnancy, during child birth, or soon after. That would be unprecedented for any time since the advent of modern medicine. And the chart above this paragraph does not agree with it either. It’s a chart of deaths per hundred THOUSAND live births, and the numbers for all racial groups are all under 100, so less than 0.1%.

    The way it’s stated also doesn’t suggest it’s a percent increase because it says it rose from 14.5% to 18.9%. I can’t figure out what they’re trying to say, but they should definitely have been more careful with presenting the numbers.

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What is going on here? The laws came into place in September 2021, but mortality was already climbing from 2019-2021. What was going on those years to cause this? Then a sharp decline in mortality between 2021 and 2022 for two of the three groups.

    • punkaccountant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      According to the cdc website pretty much everywhere in the u.s. went up during 2020-2021 and things started coming down 2022-2023. In fact it looks like the average across the u.s. was pretty much back to “normal” by 2023. But what we see here is that while things declined again for TX in 2022, they still remain quite elevated above 2019 while the u.s. average went back to pre-pandemic average, which would tell me that something else is going on in TX unrelated to the pandemic.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For a more interesting question, why did it go down for everyone except white women, and increased for white women? That’s weird enough that it feels like there’s a reason, but I have no clue what it might be.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve literally heard religious people say that women are supposed to be willing to die for their babies. If a woman wants to live and aborts a septic pregnancy she’s a bad, immoral person.

      It’s super fucked up how much conviction they have when they say it too. Women are basically just a disposable womb to them. I always feel gross when I’m near someone saying that kind of shit.