I apologize if this is old news, but I just noticed it. It looks like Kagi has added Fediverse Forums as a default Web search option.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        lets see if federation can keep the hawks away. they will certainly be trying (again) once we hit critical mass.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Cool. Wish more search engines would do that.

    But, as far as Kagi goes, it’s a paid service and it’s an American company. So I won’t be using them.

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Not using Kagi because its an American company is valid. But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product. There is still a transaction with a free product.

      Kagi is not free because they respect your privacy and don’t sell your data.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’d happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

        10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

        Like, that is way too much.

        I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          $10/m is unlimited searches though…

          And yeah, searches are actually quite expensive. There’s a LOT of infrastructure that goes into making something unique with your own search engine that isn’t just a wrapper over Google.

          The actual compute cost per search, in 2024, was $0.0125. Kagi states they want to keep Costa below $0.015 per search, but their search partners are a major expense.

          That ofc ignores all the supporting infra, devs, support…etc that goes into making it all possible.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            The business model just doesn’t make sense then (using search partners).

            Because $60, let alone $120 US, a year is far more than most people would be willing to pay.

            Dunno what to say, it’s just more than most people can justify paying for the service.

            I’m gonna stick with DuckDuckGo and the newly free mullvad cached search

            • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              I mean, the business model works? They make money, they pay staff, and they are growing.

              I don’t know what you’re talking about, people have price sensitivity of course. You are projecting yours onto “everyone”, is it not a successful business?

              There’s a niche they cater to, if you are not that niche then you are not that niche. Doesn’t mean the niche doesn’t exist.

              • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                25 days ago

                Sure, but I’m still feeling like complaining that there isn’t a business that’s made affordable pay-to-search a thing. (That I know of)

                I’m not taking back that $120 USD/year for search is way more than most people would be willing to pay

                Though yeah, I suppose saying their business model isn’t working was hyperbolic, I must admit.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Search engine? I started rawdoging urls a while ago.

        The internet is increasingly more useless, the sites i really need are bookmarked anyway.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          And I like swiss cheese on my ham sandwiches. Oh, sorry, I thought we were just saying non sequitors.

          In all seriousness, that is not an answer to the question. Yes, some (often older) people will always use a search engine to find the same website they browse all the time. But search engines are also incredibly valuable for finding new things or verifying claims. I have a bookmark for the Warframe wiki but that doesn’t help me when I want to research different monitor energy efficiencies or find a repair guide for my toaster oven.

          And while people CAN collect a set of (searchable) websites for different topics they are interested in… that is how we got into (one of) our current mess(es). How many people just use reddit for everything and thus make themselves vulnerable to corporate shittery and misinformation campaigns.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I encourage subscribers to go make themselves heard on this post if you support being able to disable particular indexes such as Yandex.

    • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Thanks for the link, I’ll def be more critical about it in the future.

      I’ll still use it (for now) because as a no-nonsense customizable search engine its by far the best I’ve tried.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’ve been using Kagi for about a month now, and I think I’m gonna stick with it. Paying with dollars instead of data/attention feels more healthy for everyone involved.

    (Fully realizing, of course, that there’s nothing stopping them from doing both, and that’s why we need better laws. Voting with your wallet will never be a complete solution… but it is something I can do right now.)

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    It’s had it for at least months but even if its years old it’s still a cool feature and deserves attention

  • anonvurr@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Cool, but I will still prefer to use duckduckgo and type Lemmy in the end of my query.