• 14 Posts
  • 463 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle






  • Thanks for sending this through

    This is gonna sound harsh, but if the Facebook is active but the website isn’t, then I’m probably not gonna bother.

    I’m organising within my union in conjuction with other left leaning orgs (don’t wish to share which one for privacy).

    Really appreciate your work in sharing these resources though and taking the time to find the archive links and emails for those interested.




  • “Magic system” is a bit of an oxymoron

    This is just the currently accepted terminology in world building: https://rebeccashedd.com/2024/10/25/the-worldbuilders-toolkit-building-a-magic-system/

    I’m just extending this to sci-fi also, as have many others, because they’re basically the same thing, only that the sci-fi magic systems are vaugely based on real-life science (but vary wildly how closely).

    Think Stargate with their loosey-goosey ancients and accession, vs the much more grounded The Expanse.

    I’m just not a fan of magic systems without any rules at all.

    Hence why I find supernatural stories less interesting, which streaming services, book shops, and movie theatres, frustratingly categorise under fantasy. They are very different from sci-fi and fantasy, in my opinion.

    If your magic is purely “mysterious”, that’s boring, and lazy story-telling (In my opinion).



  • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzSpeedy Delivery
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Soft magic systems aren’t any fun. Change my mind.

    Christianity, stranger things and paranormal activity are equally as uninteresting to me because it’s “because I said so”. Boooooooo, come up with some rules for your world.

    Can we make a new category of fiction called “supernatural” SEPARATE from sci-fi and fantasy? Thanks, that would be nice.










  • I’m not a fan of how this isn’t standardised across the world either.

    It obviously isn’t a big deal, but he’s my counter argument for fun.

    Commas are the more logical option as they already serve as breaks within a sentence.

    It’s fairly common across many languages for punctuation to use commas for short breaks within a sentence, and periods/full stops to be used to finish a sentence. It’s so common because even languages that didn’t use these symbols becore, have now adopted it (Chinese comes to mind).

    Commas as a separator within the same number fit better into this existing structure, in my opinion.

    Dots being used for decimals seems more consistent with this system also, since the difference between units and negative powers feels greater than just seperating digits into groups.

    Further (without having actually looked at statistics on this, I could be wrong about this) it’s only Europe who use dots to separate groupings of digits, and commas for decimals.

    If this is in fact the case, you (assuming you’re European) ought to switch to the majority’s system so we can have consistency.

    Fair is fair ;)

    Edit to add: I’m Australian