More efficient manufacturing, falling battery costs and intense competition are lowering sticker prices for battery-powered models to within striking distance of gasoline cars.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Archive link: https://archive.ph/5QorR

    Recently, Mr. Lawrence said, customers have been snapping up used Teslas for a little over $20,000, after applying a $4,000 federal tax credit.

    Oh, so you mean used electric cars.

    Carmakers including Tesla, Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, the owner of Jeep, have announced plans for electric vehicles that would sell new for as little as $25,000.

    Oh, so you mean not yet, but maybe affordable soon.

    For fuck’s sake…

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh, so you mean not yet, but maybe affordable soon.

      What do y’all thinking “becoming” means? If they meant they are already affordable, they would have used the term “are.”

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Becoming would mean in the process of being affordable. Meaning some have already become, meaning there are affordable cars now.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      New cars have always been expensive and out of reach for most, which is why the average new car buyer is well into their 50s.

      I don’t see how people can logically make an argument about the necessity of switching to EVs for the environment while also demanding that everyone gets a brand new car. Scrapping a bunch of perfectly good cars to build new ones is not going to help out our climate issue.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why don’t we stop subsidizing fossil fuel companies to the tune of $1Trillion Anually, and instead put all of that money towards subsidizing purchases and further R&D of electric vehicles? Oil and Gas corporations could enjoy the competition of the free market, and we the people could get access to new EVs for under $10k out of pocket - it would be a win-win!

      • PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I read that the issue with used EV’s is that you eventually need to replace the battery pack which can sometimes cost you as much as the car.

        Edit: Seems I was misinformed. Glad to hear that replacing EV batteries is not much of a concern.

        • eltrain123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I mean, you eventually need to replace the motor in an ICE car, but most people won’t… they’ll buy another vehicle instead. Most EVs lose a minimal amount of range over time… around 10% over 200k miles. Battery replacements are expensive, but not much more than replacing an engine on an ICE vehicle, unless you do all the labor yourself, and no one should be kidding themselves into believing they will actually replace a battery before they’d replace the vehicle… much like a car whose engine shits the bed. And the amount of savings you have in fuel and maintenance offsets the difference significantly, especially if you get to the 200k mark without trading up for a newer vehicle. Not to mention that there are Teslas on the road with over a million miles on them. You may not be as lucky, but 500k without replacing batteries is not uncommon.

          I’ve driven a used Tesla for the last 4 years and have 110k miles on it. It’s still humming like the day it came off the line. It’s quieter, faster, has more torque and power, and I get more compliments on it than I ever did on the ford trucks, vw coupes, or Buick sedans I ever drove. I’ve only replaced tires, windshield wipers, wiper fluid, and the 12v battery and haven’t had any maintenance issues. I drive a lot, all over the country, and save around $2k a year in fuel costs compared to when I drove a Buick. I travel all around the country and have few problems finding charging stations (mostly when way off the grid… like Great Basin national park off-the-grid… but still found a charger) and have never been stranded or ran out of mileage on a given drive. A few pigtails and I can charge at any RV park or campground nationwide.

          There is far too much misinformation about EVs and concerns with range or charging infrastructure or whatever the oil companies want you to be afraid of, and the savings in fuel costs outweigh any inconveniences I’ve experienced 10 times over.

          Take the leap and you’ll never look back. I’ll never buy another ICE vehicle again. It feels like throwing money away.

          I get that Elon is a bipolar asshole at times, but the mission to provide the infrastructure for a more sustainable future is what we need and the user experience is far better than reported.

          • PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ve wanted to get an EV for years now. Just don’t have the infrastructure in my area yet and out of my price range. But I didn’t consider buying used. It’s great to hear that I shouldn’t concern myself with replacing the battery.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I rented a Chevy Bolt once and it came with a charging cable that would plug into a regular 110V outlet. I never tried it, but online it says that chafing method is about 7.5 hours. The Bolt’s battery was 250 miles, so only useful around town if there’s zero infrastructure in the area. But within those parameters, still useful if you can charge at home.

            • eltrain123@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              If you have any way to charge at home, it’s a huge money saver and convenience. You’ll only get about 3 miles per hour off a normal 120v wall outlet, so maybe 20-30 miles over night. If you commute more than around 200 miles a week, you’ll have to have supplementary charging once a week or so.

              If you can install a 240v charger, you’ll get between 25-35 miles per hour of charge, so you’ll easily get a full charge over night. It’s usually around $500 for the equipment and $500ish for the install, depending on the area, but it makes up for it over time. Imagine never having to factor time in to stop for gas on the way to work in the morning.

              If you don’t have access to a wall plug and can’t install your own 240v charger, it may not be the right decision for you. If it is manageable for you, it’ll be a huge convenience and a big money saver.

              Bought mine for around 40k 4 years ago and have saved around 8k in fuel costs… but I drive a lot.

            • binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Infrastructure needs depend on how the car is used. I have a basic level 1 charger (120v/15a household outlet) and so far have used public chargers zero times. There has only been one time where I didn’t have enough charge for back to back trips to the next major city over, and had to rely on our second (ICE) car. Could have been avoided with a better charger. I have been hitting ~700 miles per month. One thing to keep in mind is that you just need enough charge to get to your destination and back. Going to the gas station is a big hassle so you are used to always filling up from empty. With the EV, my house is my refill station, so I just connect the cord every time I park. Even after a long trip where the car is near empty, charging slowly for 2 hours is enough for a quick errand. I’ll admit that I would have some charging anxiety if I only had the EV with no backup, but practically speaking it just doesn’t become an issue. Just keep enough charge to make it to the nearest hospital, and get a level 2 charger (240v/>=32amp) for almost 4x the charging rate.

              • Logi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                And for the Europeans in the audience, we have 240V and 15A in a normal wall socket for twice the charging speed of our American friends but half the speed of their level 2.

        • set_secret@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The idea that replacing an EV battery costs as much as the car itself is total rubbish. Sure, batteries aren’t cheap, but they’re not going to bankrupt you. Modern EV batteries last a long time, often more than a decade, and are covered by solid warranties. Plus, battery prices are dropping fast as technology gets better. Scaremongering about battery costs is just plain wrong and stops people from going green, which is the last thing we need

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If it’s even possible. I’ve personally swapped the main battery pack on a Gen 1 Prius. Not easy, but more tedious than technical. Lifting the assembled unit was a hell of a chore but a coulple strapping dudes managed it. Reconditioned cells are available in a lot of places. I’ve had a Nissan Leaf and would get another one, but even finding a battery, let alone any info on swapping it was pretty much impossible.

      • lemmyman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not seeing “cash for clunkers” types of arguments here - I’ve always seen EV adoption as more about market share of new cars rather than share of the entire fleet.

        Of course the former leads to the latter, eventually.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        demanding that everyone gets a brand new car

        That’s ridiculous. Who’s demanding that?

        We need to push new EVs, because there are not enough used ones. What do you think a used car starts as? Be happy every time someone buys a new EV, because there’s another used one in 3+ years.

        I got a new EV, because I needed a vehicle, and my pattern is to buy new and drive into the ground

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like 16 years ago you could buy a brand new chevy aveo with an msrp of $10,300.

        Small econoboxes used to be cheap and affordable.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Regardless of where you fall on EVs or new car pricing, the Aveo was hot garbage and there’s a reason why they only cost $10k. This is the same reason why you don’t see any of them on the road anymore.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            True, but at the time you could get a Toyota Echo or a Honda Fit or a Ford Fiesta or even a Nissan Versa which are all small cars that no longer exist.

            And I see plenty of them still on the road.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Those were priced higher and comparable to the compacts like the Corolla, Civic, and Sentra.

              I think there just wasn’t enough demand since people would rather pay a little more to get a little more car than they need for those rare times when a lot of cargo space was needed. Additionally, tiny CUVs like the RAV4 have increased in popularity quite a bit and still get great fuel economy, further reducing demand for the sub-compacts. These cars were also marketed toward young people like college students who have a harder time affording a new car these days and would rather buy a good used one for much cheaper.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                You’re not wrong about any of that, much to my dismay. I was just pointing out that those cars did exist and car companies can make them. The market and regulatory conditions just don’t make it profitable.

                If most of the people buying cars are in their 60s they’re going to want economic cars with high seats because their knees and backs can’t take getting into something lower. (I can say that because my knees and back already hurt, but I’m too stubborn to stop driving my compact manual car.)

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            There were a lot of good ones on the road that were sub $14 that still exist and are good for 200,000+ miles. I just pointed out one of the absolute cheapest.

    • eldavi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh, so you mean not yet, but maybe affordable soon.

      For fuck’s sake…

      i had the same feeling while knowing that people outside the united states can get brand new ev’s for $10k today.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re not wrong, but in fairness the headline says EVs are becoming affordable, not that they are affordable.

      • eldavi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re not wrong, but in fairness the headline says EVs are becoming affordable, not that they are affordable.

        he’s right; brand new ev’s go for about $10k outside the unites states; they’re already affordable but big tariffs are being employed to discourage buying them.

        curiously, even the 100% american tariff still makes these ev’s more affordable than anything in that article and i’m wondering what’s going to happen once they start building them in mexico (ie nafta).

        • set_secret@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          They don’t in Australia they’re still 50k min. We give massive subsidies to fossil fuel companies too

          • eldavi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            they’re selling out so fast that australia hasn’t gotten many yet.

            interestingly australia might be the only western country to get them since they have a free trade agreement with china while the united states and europe are putting extremely hefty tariffs on them to protect their own respective automotive industries.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not only that, most of those cars coming available are from Hertz — they’re rental cars. But not just any rental cars… most are from Hertz’s Uber fleet.

      So these are EVs with over 100,000 miles on them, worn out back seats and blistered rear armrests that have been driven by employees using a fleet lease vehicle. And migrating the cars’ software ownership to an unlocked non-fleet private owner state has proven to be… difficult.