Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg’s plan to spend $20 million to primary older Democratic incumbents in Congress has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They should have done this years ago. This opens the party to get republicans playing democrats to take over that party. We have seen this with at least 10 democrats constantly voting with republicans or a democrat completely switching parties during their term. Split the damn party or go home.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Where was the outrage when AIPAC dropped money bombs on progressive primaries to silence opposition against Israel and the Genocide of Palestinians?

    The DNC is dead to most USians, the party leadership just refuses to acknowledge it even when their candidates and strategies lose to literal outright fascists.

    No, this is the bare minimum I will accept in order to not consider the DNC my enemy.

    Burn it down.

    Also, age isn’t the problem, the problem is money and a rigid party ideology.

    • SleepyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Im gonna agree and disagree at the same time. Money and party ideology are absolutely problems within our political systems, BUT age is also a huuuge problem. Its in my opinion if we had a majority of the dem party under 50 we would have seen such a better fight against this fascist bullshit. Hell even a republican party thats led by a significantly younger majority may have even helped to prevent this as well.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also, age isn’t the problem, the problem is money and a rigid party ideology.

      They’re not exactly the same thing, but they’re certainly correlated.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let them pound sand. These geriatric bastards are incapable of adapting to the malevolence currently destroying everything. We need somebody willing to punch these conservative bastards’ teeth down their throats.

  • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    What the FUCK did they think would happen after the most catastrophic election loss in a generation? The DNC and Democratic leadership should have enough of a sense of the gravity of the situation we’re in to resign in shame. Instead they have the audacity to complain?? Seriously, understand how big of a failure you’ve been a part of and actually DO SOMETHING to help solve it.

    • freshcow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the same Democratic party leadership that ran Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’s campaigns. The same Democratic party leadership that cares more about stopping Bernie Sanders than about stopping Donald Trump. They know who’s side they are on, and it’s not the same side as you and me. The Democratic party is unfortunately rotten to the core, and it’s all about the money. Imagine the concept of regulatory capture applied to politicians broadly and you will understand the modern Democratic party and the state of our government. We need a party built from the ground up to represent the working class, whether it be from the ashes of the Democratic party or otherwise. Primary them at every turn or run independent campaigns where feasible. The other challenge is that mainstream media is owned by the same corporate masters, so it will be an uphill battle regardless.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is the same Democratic party leadership that ran Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’s campaigns.

        Yes but no. The people who won the party leadership elections a few months ago are not neoliberal establishment dems. They’re the kind of people who would, for instance, spend 20 million dollars to primary ineffectual establishment democrats.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hogg is. They made all the DNC leaders sign a no-challenge pledge recently. Every one of them signed it, except David Hogg.

          Also, notably, he isn’t doing these primary challenges in his official DNC vice chair capacity. This is on the side as part of his PAC initiatives.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They literally think if they sit back, do nothing, and let the Trump regime destroy our government from within, that we will be forced to come crawling back to them next election.

      Fuck that, fuck the Dems, we deserve much better than these selfish pricks.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mistake for who? Not a mistake for me, not a mistake tactically considering the policy and popularity polling, not a mistake when you consider that these people have been suppressing popular and well polling progressive policies and candidates for decades and still managed to lose the presidency and both houses to a goddamn moron…

    All of this shit, all of these “reasons” they list in opposition to Hogg’s initiative, they are all bullshit. Bullshit and deflections and distractions from the fact that they are concerned exclusively about the bottom line for their wealthy benefactors, and about their own as well. The irony that is not lost on anyone is that they are the assholes who did this to us in the first place, and would you look at that, Donald Trump is about to hand them a tax cut.

    • KittyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Both sides, the old guard is useless but he’s massively anti 2A, which is also not helpful right now.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Na the fascists are also going to need to get rid of the 2A soon. They don’t need headlines like “ICE impersonator shot by citizen while conducting an extra judicial abduction”

        • KittyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can’t put that genie back in the bottle on any reasonable time scale, there’s more guns than people in the US, and half of them are basically invisible to authorities.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Both sides, the old guard is useless but

        but here comes the excuse…

        he’s massively anti 2A, which is also not helpful right now.

        How convenient!

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    LO AND BEHOLD M’LORD.

    I was just talking about how the dems are ineffective and have no strategy, and here’s another one to add to my list of sources.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hogg is 100% right and they are just whining like babies when they should be doing their effing jobs.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with the older Dems, but not for their reasons.

    No, we should not support the candidates that Hogg supports. Because Hogg is very opposed to 2A rights, and ipso facto any candidate that he supports will also be opposed to 2A rights. And if you think that we’re gonna just vote our way out of this, I’ve got some very, very bad news for you.

    Primary the old fucks with young leftists (hopefully ones that actually understand economics and tax policy)? Absolutely! Primary them with ones that ideologically aligned with Hogg? No.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Once they’re primaried, people can vote for whoever is the better candidate.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That was my gut instinct too, who is this kid, how did he get a vice chair position, and ya who are these young candidates and do they understand global economics, international relations, military. What roles in congressional comittees will they be qualified for. I’m tired of seeing morons overseeing nukes. Thats gotta stop.

      • Daggity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He survived a school shooting. I think he has good reasons for wanting gun control. Although personally I agree that citizens need to be armed against our fascist state.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most people are for gun control, branding yourself as anti 2A doesn’t really inspire hope that he can cross the aisle. It doesn’t have to be a toxic issue but it’s delicate. After checking the wiki he seems like he’s got some qualification. Left some room to be desired but I’ll judge the man by his work.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it’s safe to say that the ancient Democrats who’ve been holding onto their seats by sheer force of incumbent political influence, contributed to turning Hogg into a school-shooting survivor. Obviously Republicans bear more responsibility thanks to their gun/violence fetish, but these Dems wouldn’t be so angry if he hadn’t touched a nerve. They’re clearly afraid of young people with new and rational ideas.

    I hope these young’uns keep at it, their passion and drive is inspirational. Since the geriatrics in power clearly can’t smell their own bullshit anymore, fuck em. No one is entitled to power, you have to earn it like Hogg has through his dedicated activism. His organization has helped pass more than 250 gun safety laws, for example. He’s actually doing shit.

    • atmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only that they’re afraid of both the real left and real right of young who can vastly transform the country for the better if they worked together

      Which they are doing already. But if they do it even more on every level then that will be HUGE transformations every day not weeks or months or years or decades

      The greatest strength the younger generations have is adaptability and having a clearer mind of what to focus on as a collective

      They strength themselves, and even more so with others

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s a great point. The party is only hurting itself in the short and long term by not welcoming younger candidates and trying to elect people who are actually willing to wield their power by trying shit out, rather than just further entrenching themselves by wielding their political influence. That’s the difference, the younger generations are willing to try out new policies and see if they work. That’s how this whole fucking system is supposed to function. Try something out, if it doesn’t work then too bad, you lose the next election and continue working on your ideas while the other party tries their shit out to see if their ideas work. We’ve strayed so far from that, that everyone is just accustomed to the government not trying big things, and nobody trusts that the other side would ever govern or compromise in good faith.

        That’s why their anger is so frustrating to me. They’ve been there forever and done jack shit, and whine like children when someone young comes along and acts more mature by offering to fix the shit the elders have refused to.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If it has to be democrats instead of a new party, this is literally the only way to make it work.

    Good Job David Hogg and Leaders We Deserve, hope you oust a ton of these ancient shitbirds.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The neoliberals no longer have the chair…

      Ken Martin does…

      And the same DNC voters who elected him, elected David Hogg as a vice chair…

      Like, this is the party.

      Why would we push for a new one, when we just got control of the old one after decades?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Martin has been making the same AIPAC-slave moves as the last dem corporation leader. The time you spent learning his name was completely wasted. He might as well be the last guy.

      • VasovagalSyncope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We’re not doing another 2016

        We can have leftist leadership or admit we want a fascist dictatorship.

        The DNC have had over 50 years to choose to force their rich doners to make concessions. They’ve shown they aren’t interested.

        The Neoliberals don’t get to be in charge anymore.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Neoliberals don’t get to be in charge anymore.

          They’re literally not tho…

          Like, the battles were fought, the war was won…

          You just don’t seem to be politically engaged enough to have noticed.

          • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So in your view, the current makeup of democratic leadership, representatives and senators is what “fixed” should look like?

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love his energy, but I sincerely disagree with the whole gun control narrative right now. Leaning into that when there are about to be a shitload of far right militias deputized is an absolutely fucking idiotic plan.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. He has the right idea on this, but given his gun control background I don’t trust him any farther than I can throw him. Gun control is, at this point, nothing more than a way to lose votes. To an anti-gun liberal, gun control is good policy that saves lives. To a pro gun person, gun control is an unconstitutional civil rights violation that makes a candidate unlectable. This turns away an awful lot of pro-gun moderates from rural areas- these are the voters who make a difference in elections.
      And as for the anti-gun base, and anti-gun moderates, what are they going to do, vote Republican in protest? Let’s be real.

      Gun control is a lose lose proposition

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gun control means: mandatory background checks, waiting periods, bans on previously convicted violent criminals owning guns, potentially magazine limits or limits on fully automatic licenses to specific users (like you may need to demonstrate you have proficiency and be a member of a gun club). None of this goes against “the right to bear arms”.

      It does not mean nobody can buy guns or that guns are taken away - this is the fearmongering always pushed by the very conservative, very pro-Trump NRA.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gun control seems to mean ‘a little more’. This comic is popular among gun owners because it reflects the feeling of constantly ratcheting ‘compromise’.

        A perfect example of that is background checks. The original bill was a compromise, All gun sales at gun stores are required to have a background check, but the compromise is that private sales between one person and another are exempted. That was a negotiated compromise between the pro gun and anti-gun side. I think for the most part it was a decent compromise. But now the anti-gun side is trying to roll it back calling it the ‘gun show loophole’ which is horribly named because a gun dealer at a gun show has to do a background check anyway, and most gun shows require background checks for all sales either from a dealer or a private citizen.

        The problem with universal background checks is the concept of a transfer. For example, under some proposals, if you want to lend somebody your hunting rifle to go hunting with, that might count as a transfer, which means you have to go to a gun store and pay about $50 and fill out paperwork to legally transfer ownership of the gun to them. And then when they return they have to transfer it back to you.

        You should also know that an awful lot of gun owners absolutely hate the NRA. They serve a useful purpose, but their constant deranged rabble rousing fundraising makes gun owners look like paranoid morons.
        What I would much prefer to do is outreach and education. An awful lot of gun control laws are based on a total misunderstanding of what guns do and how they work and what makes them powerful or not, I think if more Democrats actually understood guns you would see fewer attempts at bad laws that do nothing to increase safety but just try to turn the screws on gun owners.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So like… I was in my early thirties when this happened. I know. I remember. I watched some of the news livestreams as it went down.

        I said what I said understanding that.

        I am by no means trying to diminish, demean, discredit, disparage, or otherwise detract from his experience. Im saying that I am very fucking concerned that an actual war is coming, and disarming right before a war is a great fucking way to get killed.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those laws wouldn’t get passed until this whole thing is over and there are progressives in office able to actually do things, if that happens. You wouldn’t have gun control as the law of the land in two months. And guns need to take a massive fucking back seat in America. No more blood cult shit, because that’s what it is.

      Go for what you actually want, which is freedom. Freedom is when you aren’t surrounded by people with guns.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Freedom is black folks being able to shoot Klanners who try to burn down their homes. The 2nd Amendment isn’t just for pricks.