Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren’t communism

The system isn’t working for the people

Edit:

I’ve changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don’t believe the elections will be fair so it’s a win win for you.

  • monkA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So, is this finally time to give up the 1.5 party system and promote/vote independent? One party has fallen out of favor, another one is on track to do the same, now the first one joins in the nosedive…

    When I suggested it last year, I was called a Russian troll who tries to win more votes for Trump or something. The fucker won anyway. What’s your excuse now?

  • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Jesus Christ, is this real?

    Big cities have problems, but they are still far better off than small town rural America. There isn’t some specific failure happening in large cities, you’re seeing the broad inevitable enshittification of Capitalism as a system.

    Democrats must be some serious masochists, they would actually rather take the blame thenselves than admit capitalism is wrong.

    DNC: we tried bootlicking billionaires and it didn’t work, what if we double down on bootlicking billionaires even harder.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s also reported here. This fits with the reports of complaining that Democratic Congresspeople have been doing about the progressive wing of the party wanting them to fight back against DOGE. They and party leadership may well be aiming to not just talk like it, but fully become the new Republican party, in hopes of having a stampede of “moderate” Republicans who aren’t happy with Trump come their way.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      The top of the Democratic party basically wants to become the party of big money and try and steal this mantle from the Republicans.

      Obviously, this isn’t going to work because the donors will just go for the party that will give them more, and they will always be the Republicans party.

      This is basically just the campaign advisors trying to get as much money into the campaigns as possible, because they get a cut of every ad buy. They’re not interested in making things better for the people, just looking at their bottom line.

  • cybersin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 days ago

    The “far left” has a disproportionate influence on policy and messaging?

    What a joke.

    They’re going to use this defeat to blame progressives and Walz (who consistently had the highest favorability of anyone on either side of the race) instead of their conservative cop Kamala.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 days ago

      They selected Walz because he was polling the best (because he talks like a normal person), and then they basically hid him because they didn’t like what he said. Not sure if he did any interviews after the Jon Stewart one where he was slightly too honest about Liz Cheney.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      Looks like it to me.

      Moderates have done nothing but sell their America out for a seat at an empty table. How could anything good come from people who are currently in charge of the shit show called the DNC?

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        We should really be discussing ways to take over the party, like the tea party did. I’ve been wondering why I’m so reluctant to register as a Democrat yet wanting to feel like a part of it I want to bend to my will

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        Moderates have done a thousand times more good for America than progressives.

        Last progressive president was who, maybe JFK, and he didn’t even finish a full term.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Moderates didn’t stop trump.

          Moderates didn’t protect abortion.

          Moderates didn’t stop bibi from bombing the shit out of Palestine.

          Moderates didn’t secure the supreme court.

          Moderates didn’t make trump regret jan 6th.

          Moderates didn’t prevent what’s happening to Ukraine right now.

          Moderates didn’t make net neutrality into law.

          Moderates didn’t legalize weed.

          Moderates didn’t think America could handle a primary.

          Moderates didn’t think primaries should be fair.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            The first two and last one moderates definitely tried but no one but moderates wanted to vote for Clinton so the conservatives got a majority in the SCOTUS and Trump got voted in the first time.

            As for stopping Israel, no one in the world including the progressives have done anything meaningful there.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 days ago

                Last election people knew they had a choice between Donald Trump and status quo and eighty million people decided they didn’t give a fuck what happened.

                I’d say that is a pretty good reason why the government is falling apart.

                • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  Moderates were at the helm my dude. They marched out all their best friends. Dick Cheney. Liz Cheney. Mike Pence.

                  Biden is poster boy moderate. He even brought us famous legislation like:

                  Student loan debt being unforgiveable

                  War on drug shit to save us from the “super criminals”

                  I’m not saying moderates aren’t an important part of the GOP. Honestly they are sometime easier to be around. I just think they will appear pompous against a trump who is brilliantly an asshole and get creamed.

                • missingno@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  So we agree that voters do not want status quo? Because that’s what moderates were offering.

        • cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Last progressive president was who, maybe JFK, and he didn’t even finish a full term.

          Yeah, I know. He really just quit half way through.

          Oh, wait. He was ASSASSINATED.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 days ago

    The rightwing coup within the DNC. Those staffers and consultants need to be blacklisted from politics. They have done nothing but drive the country into fascism.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      loudoun county is wealthier, better educated, more diverse, and more ‘blue’ these days than most ‘suburban’ counties. local democrats could shift left of ocasio-cortez and sanders (et al) and still win.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m sure if they break right then those Republicans they’ve been chasing for the last 40 years will finally vote for them!

    • cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Just a bit further now… Soon they’ll be doing the “Roman” salutes too.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The blue MAGA are here on Lemmy and I ran into couple of them. They keep shouting to the rooftops that the Democratic party did nothing wrong and berate Trump voters as stupid and ignorant. But they are tone deaf when you point out that the Democratic party is not willing to run on the platform on Medicare-for-all, build more social housing and increase federal minimum wage (and ditch Israel), which made the party unappealing and lose consistently. Basically, blue MAGA don’t want to go left, because even if they are socially progressive on issues, they benefit from wealth inequality because they themselves are affluent in spite of being socially progressive.

    Edit: yep, the blue MAGA came out of the woodwork. They think Medicare for all, affordable housing, and increasing minimum wage are red fascism.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They keep shouting to the rooftops that the Democratic party did nothing wrong

      Yeah I don’t believe you. People aren’t saying that. That is you taking the liberty of recharacterizing their thoughts.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I have been accused of loving Democrats for saying things like “what are Democrats supposed to do about voters who would let trump win?” It’s as though nuance was outlawed and people cannot understand that a problem can have multiple causes.

          And yes I’ve heard all that about being inspiring. The reality is that educated people would’ve made very different voting choices. Americans are incredibly ignorant. Democrats can’t hypnotize people into not being idiots

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I find the concept of “voters were just to dumb, cant do anything about that” to be quite representative of what is wrong with the party. It is elitist, it is factually false and it is deeply undemocratic.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yes I’m aware that people think nonvoters are helpless and then somehow find that better than being dumb

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            What Democrats are supposed to do is sell those voters on a platform of meaningful change that addresses their fears and concerns. It’s a candidate’s job to win voters over to their side, and if they can’t do that, you have to actually ask questions about what went wrong and learn lessons from it instead of throwing your hands up and declaring it’s everyone else’s fault but the DNC’s. Otherwise that attitude is what will lead to doing the exact same thing in 2028 and getting the same results.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There are plenty of them if you lurk long enough. They will harp “vote blue, no matter who” and repeating the meme “leopards ate your face”. The litmus test is to mention that Democrats did not go left enough which is why people voted for Trump (who promised the always appealing tax cuts amidst the growing inequality and radical reshoring of companies), and blue MAGA will bury their heads in the sand and keep calling Latinos, black folks and white working class and others who are working three jobs, living pay check to paycheck, and can’t afford to pay for medical insurance as ignorant, racist, misogynists, Uncle Toms, etc.

        Sure it was stupid to vote Trump, but it was more stupid of Democrats to lose to an orange man by not appealing and refusing to acknowledge those who have economic anxieties brought by mismanaged globalisation. It would have been an easy victory, but blue MAGA and DNC do not want to alienate the same donors that fund the Republicans (I mean, look at the screenshot where it says to court big donors instead).

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sure it was stupid to vote Trump, but it was more stupid of Democrats to lose to an orange man by not appealing and refusing to acknowledge those who have economic anxieties brought by mismanaged globalisation.

          Average red fascist preferring literal fascists to the dreaded Shitlibs™

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            You have it the other way around. It is the Shitlibs™ preferring literal fascists by not going left enough on common sense policies that the rest of other developed countries take for granted. By not running on popular policies, Shitlibs are tacitly allowing literal fascists to take power. Instead, all the Shitlibs/blue MAGA say is “I am not my opponent. And you will be happy with our breadcrumb policies or the other guy wins! (But we don’t care, we get paid by our corporate donors regardless)”

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              You have it the other way around. It is the Shitlibs™ preferring literal fascists by not going left enough on common sense policies that the rest of other developed countries take for granted.

              “They didn’t go far left enough; therefore, the smarter choice was to vote for the furthest right option available.”

              👏

              By not running on popular policies, Shitlibs are tacitly allowing literal fascists to take power.

              Tell me more about these popular policies. Or rather, tell me more about their popularity in the US electorate.

              • missingno@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                “They didn’t go far left enough; therefore, the smarter choice was to vote for the furthest right option available.”

                They didn’t offer any meaningful change at a time when voters were upset with the status quo, therefore the voters chose a fascist who was offering something rather than nothing.

                At the end of the day, we lost. And we have to talk about why we lost if we want to learn any lessons next time.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  They didn’t offer any meaningful change at a time when voters were upset with the status quo, therefore the voters chose a fascist who was offering something rather than nothing.

                  Doesn’t make it a smart fucking choice. If anything, context makes it stupider.

                  At the end of the day, we lost. And we have to talk about why we lost if we want to learn any lessons next time.

                  And unfortunately, ‘policy wasn’t left enough’ isn’t the answer.

                  Dem policy should move leftward, mind you. But not because it’ll win us votes. Policy is of marginal importance to everyone save a handful of terminally educated political junkies like us. Dem policy should move leftward because left policy will be better for the country and move the country itself left in the long-term.

                  Elections, though? We have to win those using different criteria than “What’s good for the country.”

                  Or at least, we did. God knows if we’ll have meaningful elections again at this point.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      But they are tone deaf when you point out that the Democratic party is not willing to run on the platform on Medicare-for-all, build more social housing and increase federal minimum wage (and ditch Israel), which made the party unappealing and lose consistently.

      Oh cool, those are winning issues in the Dem primaries, right?

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        So you are indeed one of those.

        It is as if Bernie, a more popular candidate, wasn’t deliberately sidelined. It is as if Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, another popular politician, wasn’t selected to head the Oversight committee and chose instead a geriatric, monied politician. It is

        And finally, ask yourself, is not running on those popular platforms gave Democrats the win in elections? Or are you going to call people dumb? Who is really the dumb one for losing against annoying orange?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          So you are indeed one of those.

          “BlueMAGA is when you look at a fascist-voting electorate and don’t see The Indomitable Rise Of The Proletariat™ in a fascist electoral victory”

          It is as if Bernie, a more popular candidate, wasn’t deliberately sidelined.

          More popular as measured by…?

          It is as if Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, another popular politician, wasn’t selected to head the Oversight committee and chose instead a geriatric, monied politician.

          That has nothing to do with Dem primaries or the electorate, man.

          And finally, ask yourself, is not running on those popular platforms gave Democrats the win in elections?

          No. If it was, why would Bernie not have won the Dem primaries? If these positions were so overwhelmingly popular when expressed by politicians and not as abstracts, why would Bernie, an undeniably charismatic, fucking spotless politician with years of experience and a sharp wit, lose to Clinton, and then Biden?

          Or are you going to call people dumb? Who is really the dumb one for losing against annoying orange?

          I didn’t realize intelligence was measured in votes. I guess I have to concede that your position is correct - by that measure, fascism is smart, while all the losers are dumb. Like the Dems. And the PSL.

          After all, if they were smart, they would’ve won, right?

          I’m a two-time Bernie voter. If there was a real primary in '24, I probably would’ve been a three-time Bernie voter. I marched for him back when my leg was good. I donated. I hammered on doors.

          People are not as left as you think they fucking are.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Your comment is strange and contradictory, which I have suspicion of on what your trying to do. But I will bite.

            Dem primaries-- much of whom are full of blue MAGA and rigged by DNC elites-- selecting a non-popular candidate who will do the bidding of corporate donors will not win the actual election. Bernie is popular when polled on national level (by the way, in a hypothetical election between Trump and Bernie, showed the latter would be way ahead). But if polled among the elites and blue MAGA such as yourself? Of course he is not popular.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Dem primaries-- much of whom are full of blue MAGA and rigged by DNC elites-- selecting a non-popular candidate who will do the bidding of corporate donors will not win the actual election.

              Rigged how?

              Bernie is popular when polled on national level (by the way, in a hypothetical election between Trump and Bernie, showed the latter would be way ahead).

              Okay, so it should have been easy for him to get out the vote in the primaries, right?

              But if polled among the elites and blue MAGA such as yourself? Of course he is not popular.

              I literally pointed out that I’m a Bernie supporter. Did you forget to read the comment before replying or something?

              Would you like to remind me what Bernie’s weakest demographics were in the Dem primaries, in 2016 and 2020?

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    you want a maga monarchy, even long after the diaper’s been buried? this is one of many ways to hand it to them.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      As long as they’re part of the aristocracy they don’t care.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nooo, you’re not supposed to blame Democratic leadership, you’re supposed to blame the voters!

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Guys I figured it out! Republicans win so we just need to be Republicans! It’s fool proof!”

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    I smell bullshit here, but yeah this is definitely a laundry list of exactly the stuff not to do. A moderate democrat is a Krysten Sinema and a Joe Manchin that exactly did a lot of damage to Democrats.

    Also, owning up to democratic governance issues of large cities? Republicans run <20% of America’s top 50 cities, and 10% of the top 30. Republicans are not in the business of running large cities, so WTF would give credence to them on a topic they literally have no expertise or relevant track record in doing.

    • zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Has “having no expertise or relevant track record” on something ever stopped the GOP from trying to push through ideas? Seems pretty on-brand to me

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    What’s not mentioned in this excerpt is that this was sponsored by Third Way, a think tank that is singlemindedly devoted to convincing Democrats to cut the left out of the party. God knows the DNC has its problems, but it’s misleading to frame this as a mainstream Democratic conference.

    “Moderates say party should go moderate” shocker

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Primary them all out.

    Progressives absolutely can execute a takeover of the party, just like the far right did with the Tea Party movement. Primary out every blue MAGA Dem, get real progressives in their place.