• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Parental controls: exist

    Law makers: But what if we made people submit really sensitive information instead of requiring websites to identify themselves as adult for the purpose of content filters?

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What, parents actually parenting and monitoring what their children do? Talking with them about being online?

      Granted I say this sarcastically and then mom and dad both fall for AI garbage on Facebook yet again so maybe I should rethink that they are even capable of having a discussion on critical thinking

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The irony being this sort of thing will make people more used to sharing very sensitive information online and more likely to fall for phishing attempts. Like the parents who couldn’t figure out parental controls in the first place probably are.

  • JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem is that once it will be normal to request IDs for porn, the same will be extended to everything else with excuses like “let’s do it for the kids” or “if you don’t have anything to hide…”.

    VPNs… yeah sure, until there will be a crackdown on those too.

      • Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        China doesn’t want to

        Just like the US gov not catching drug lords when they do stupid stuff

          • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Remote work/administration too. I work on servers one of which is behind the chinese firewall, via ssh. ssh can carry socks natively, I could build a crude throttled but working vpn in seconds.

            China is also slowing transfers in general, I guess to push domestic providers and servers. Even with that if they don’t want to sever all economic and scientific connections it will remain possible, though cumbersome to most.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They don’t turn a blind eye. It’s just that the VPN’s that work through China’s firewall do so over ports that the entire internet uses, like 443 (https). They could filter everything, but it’d be a loooot more resource intensive to filter all internet traffic by destination/content instead of only doing that with extra ports that extra services like VPNs normally use.

          … and as others have pointed out, there ARE valid reasons to allow some VPNs. Forcing them to jump through hoops to function is no skin off their back, while properly filtering all traffic would be disasterous for them beyond the expense.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      My VPN is in Switzerland, they have strong protective laws, for now.

      Guess we’ll all have to download and prepare to share!?!

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    To save costs on VPN services, Rsync the wank bank for all your mates to share. This month it’s Daves turn so expect lots of scat but I did put in a request for incest too.

        • Billegh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pretty much just the side dishes: Alabama dunks it in sweet‑tea BBQ sauce while hollering “Roll Tide,” West Virginia soaks it in moonshine, hands you a pepperoni roll, and cranks “Country Roads” on repeat. Same brochure; just different tailgate menus.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m all for VPN services, but I seem to recall some sketchy things about Proton in particular - anyone have any alternatives they like?

      • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        mullvad is good for most casual users but if you want to do anything technical i’d steer clear.

        you can’t forward the ports anymore in mullvad. don’t get me wrong, they did it as a measure to reduce the volume of CSAM and other trauma-inducing imagery their administrators had to deal with and i totally respect that reasoning. people get legitimate PTSD moderating and administrating certain platforms/services.

        just a shame torrenting gets made harder for everyone because of a handful of despicable individuals.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The reason they disabled this was it was a possible privacy leak. This means if you are using a VPN that enables port forwarding, you might be at risk.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a new user of proton… Id like to hear what you think is sketchy. I haven’t heard anything negative.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Listen man. There are no non sketchy VPN there never has been there never ever will be. Period. All you can do is the least worst one and that is proton today. Might be someone else tomorrow. If anyone tries to tell you anything different they are a liar or ignorant.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Saw a comment saying the ID process accepts any ol’ ID sample pic you find from a quick image search online.

  • MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For most of world history UK has kind of been among the worst countries in the world. They were committing atrocities in the name of preserving religious ideals before nazis were even a thing. Their leadership has been starving their citizens while the monarchy lives with lavish excess since before north korea ever existed. Committing war crimes used to be as commonplace back in the day as afternoon tea.

    How the UK somehow fell into public favor online seems like an anomaly to me. They got attacked during WW2 and then weren’t communists during the cold war. Big woop-de-doo. People usually speak highly of UK online but any time they’re in the news it’s because they’re doing something truly awful (recently moving towards establishing a regime of online censorship on par with that of China’s).

    I am shocked whenever I see people reacting to something shitty the UK is doing like its some kind of unprecedented unexpected event. They’ve been doing this type of shit for THE LAST THOUSAND YEARS. All I’m saying is they deserve A LOT more hate than they currently get.