• ComRed2 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s right, destroy the 4th largest economy in the world, that happens to be american. Fucking do it.

    Born too late to explore the world, born too early to explore the stars, but born just in time to see the amerikkkan empire collapse.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    COLLAPSE, COLLAPSE, COLLAPSE

    HISTORY MARCHES ON

    ALL EMPIRES DIE

    But no seriously, the empire is literally eating itself alive because it’s elites despise it’s demographic makeup, and the last residual vestiges of Keynesianism infuriate them beyond belief

    Self-envenomation; neoliberalism won too hard

      • boiledfrog [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago
        bored at work so I'm gonna rant a bit

        I mean, collapse won’t happen in a few days time, but I’ve been increasingly reflecting on how antisocial, inhumane and unsustainable the western model is and how there has been a clear effort (imo) to make people ignore the ecological disastrous time we’re currently entering (COVID being a perfect example to this), which means they don’t have any meaningful solutions. All the liberal institutions that enforce the current mode of living are completely hollowed out and are operating on pure cynicism and misanthropy.

        The system will collapse, it literally cannot continue for much longer but the longer it stays alive, the worse the damage and suffering will be. We have to remember that it is only through solidarity we can build something better, which may sound impossible right now but solidarity is one of the most human things ever and once that ball starts rolling it can become an unstoppable force.

        I’m preaching to the choir here, but I’m “enjoying” myself lately by making libs in my entourage uncomfortable about this fact, because even the libbiest libs can’t really deny the dire state we’re in, like shit is getting really, really fucking bad, really fast.

  • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    US Balkanization 2025 sicko-charging

    California gives the federal government way more in tax money than it gets back. California basically bankrolls the rest of the country. They also grow most of the produce in the country.

    The US needs California way more than California needs the US. California should absolutely cut off funds to the federal government if this happens and start just paying for their own shit. Suddenly they’ll have a huge budget surplus.

    • imagine thinking taxes paid and digital 1’s and 0’s in bank accounts is somehow representative of material reality.

      california is just another a shape on a map drawn by colonizers less than 200 years ago. the idea it can do its own thing because it pays big taxes on its big monies is the same line of thinking that is inspiring tariff brains to raise taxes on imports to “pay down” sovereign debt and “balance trade”. money has value because it can be used to buy stuff and pay people to do things. empire works for the core because it sends money all over the world in exchange for materials to satisfy the core’s demands. controlling the money is more important than having the money, which are two different things. it’s the difference between having a bunch of currency at your house and having a globally integrated banking system.

      anyway, all money is federal. so california decides to stop paying income tax on their 3 card monte games (intellectual property of hollywood and silicon valley)… who cares? the feds will print the money needed to do the things to re-assert control. the arm of US power over its states is in the banking system, and good luck operating a functional payroll system of direct deposits for state workers and large organizations if the feds even tickle the “get fucked” button. i mean, i guess the brain trust of silicon valley could rapidly launch some kind of state crypto, but i would give that about 72 hours before somebody walks away from the wildly short arm of Technorepublic of California with a few hundred bazillion.

      balkanization is a dead carcass being carved up by predators. the shoulder doesn’t “win” just because it used to hold the backpack when the body was alive.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      California, Florida, and Texas seem like prime candidate states where the oligarchs might decide that they can turn them into their personal fiefdoms in the near future.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      California way more than California needs the US

      My understanding is that California needs the water that does not reside within California… Something of a mild problem for going independent, they would need to secure that water source as part of California. It’s a necessary requirement for them to be independent.

      • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Almost all of California’s water comes from inside California.

        The only one of these water sources that come from outside the state is the Colorado River, and that’s an amount of water that could relatively easily be made up from internal sources.

        I’m not sure why people think this about California aside from it technically being one of the Colorado River states, but all the other Colorado River states that’s like their only source of water, Cali it’s really an afterthought.

      • Florn [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        An independent California could still work if the state government mostly abandons LA and transfers population to the less desert-y north (I don’t think they’re willing or able to do this)

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          California is not a very unified state. If CA were to leave the union, NorCal and SoCal would be a moderate challenge to keep integrated, and you would very rapidly see the Central Valley coming up with a motion to break from California, à la West Virginia.

          It’s one of at least 5 states that are straining at the seams and would rip open if the right crisis came about.

            • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              CA, WA, and IL each have very strong and active secessionist sentiments in the more inland parts of the state. Technically and notoriously, OR does too, but the population east of the Cascades is maybe 1/8 of the state’s total population- in other terms, substantially less than the population of Wyoming.

              Most of VA has a massive resentment towards the “[people] north of Richmond”, and that feeling is very much mutual. PA has large cultural, economic, and geographic barriers between east and west, and while I don’t know of people that actively want it to split, in case of national restructuring I have a hard time seeing the state retain its present boundaries.

              There are also states like FL, TX, LA, and NY that have vocally diverse sub-state identities, but I don’t see those being out of alignment enough to shake up state boundaries. Not very easily, at least.

            • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              east washington and oregon have some “greater idaho” nazis, confederate illinois hates chicago more than they like money. Republic of New Afrika probably isn’t popular enough an idea to come back but maybe something like that would be a thing again if we’re collapsing. Texas could probably split up more after a while, but pretty much the whole country is on some urban/rural shit and there’d probably be separatist counties anywhere you have rural areas next to a red state and far from their liberal capital like western minnesota.

              people in the US identify with the country way more than state or region for the most part unlike the group divisions in a Yugoslavia or anywhere with colonial straight line borders so it’s hard to have any confidence in how it would break down.

    • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      California should absolutely cut off funds to the federal government if this happens and start just paying for their own shit. Suddenly they’ll have a huge budget surplus.

      If I recall correctly the problem is at least in terms of income tax that’s automatically withheld for most people. Same thing with corporate taxes. You’d have to get thousands, tens of thousands of companies to agree to violate federal law and face massive federal backlash including you know jail for the owners for this to work. Sorry to say but those companies aren’t going to go along with it. They’re going to continue sending Washington DC the withholdings from employee paychecks and from their own owed taxes because they don’t want that kind of trouble and are not revolutionaries.

      In olden times this might have been more practical for the state as they could just hold up physical money cars leaving with this stuff but these days its all electronic so there’s really no border to police.

      • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is all factually correct, but I hope Californian comrades are talking to their local liberals about this stuff. “Normie” types don’t like what’s going on and are down to think about what life would look like without Trump in the picture.

        “Yeah if they cut all federal funding, then why are we paying ~30% as a state to the US? Let’s just stop, what’s the worst that could happen?”

        This has never been in the media before so you can finally kick of an actual political conversation that has very few existing brainworms.

        Maybe in a decade “West coast secessionist” viewpoints have a space in the conversation, although at the fringe of the mainstream (thinking along the lines of “alt-right”). This sort of internal tension is bad for the empire and good for the global south. I think socialists should be advocating for it. We know that the Democratic voter base, and even many Republican voters are to the left of the Democratic Party on a lot of social issues. Weakening the DNC means we could actually get some socdem shit done while things are unstable and on decline.


        Ideals don’t drive the wheels of history, but they do steer them. As you said, this is not something that is practical materially, but on the ideological battlefield, we need to wield it as a rallying point for something to the left of neoliberalism. If everything goes well, you’d probably get the West coast to be another Canada tbh. Maybe would even make sense to annex in to Canada?

    • theturtlemoves [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      California gives the federal government way more in tax money than it gets back.

      Yes, but

      The US needs California way more than California needs the US.

      this is not true. California benefits from access to the US dollar. An independent California would either have to come up with its own currency - one that is not artificially inflated by being the world trade currency - or use the dollar at the mercy of the US.

      • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sorry wasn’t trying to imply “California must go it on its own, it’ll be better off.” Just that the feds can’t just force California to do things because California could absolutely cripple the United States single-handedly.

        Like, if Louisiana tried to fight the feds they’d instantly be under complete occupation and the US as a whole wouldn’t even notice. If California does it, the entire country’s economy shuts down, grocery store shelves fo empty, and it would take a large scale invasion to retake control.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          The feds can absolutely force California to do whatever the feds want. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of any of the institutions or the political establishment in California putting up real resistance. The most they will do is what they are already doing which is try to score political points by saying shit that they think makes them sound “tough” to their voters. When push actually comes to shove all of them will fold like Origami.

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately gruesome newsome isn’t cool enough to respond with large-scale cancelation of Californian finding for the federal government.

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Has Newsom commented on this?

    In the article - Ctrl-f “Newsom” - only one result and it’s pointless for my question

    The president and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have also publicly feuded for years.