Depends on a lot of things, obviously this person is revealing their ignorance to you in an obvious way. You know more than them.
As far as how to respond and communicate any further, many questions come to mind:
- Is this a person you are obligated to have a continued relationship with?
- is this a person who you want to have a continued relationship with?
- Is there a power dynamic on your relationship with this person?
- Do you think they would be hostile if any particular topics were to come up?
- Does this person have a any position of implicit or explicit social or political power/influence?
These answers would all influence my response, but I don’t particularly enjoy engaging with people who’s understanding of the world is so misaligned from mine that I usually just move on as quickly as possible.
In small orgs, this is easier than you probably expect. As soon as they use the word “socialism” (to mean Scandinavian social democracy) you’re able to be the coolest and most knowledgeable socialist in the room cause you’ve read theory etc. The key is to be polite even if they’re being annoyingly lib, but at that point you’re golden.
Understanding class struggle tends to make excellent leaders and even liberals can see that if you take the opportunity to get results. At that point the goal is to educate your peers and build the org, eventually developing a relationship with our even cooler comrades over at PSL (or some such).
Remember these people aren’t liberal establishment adherents or else they’d be Democrats. They’re probably undereducated potential DemSocs (assuming they’re privileged nerds who want to do non-duopoly electoral politics). If that’s your style, go for it. If you’re a direct action person or more outright revolutionary, obviously not the best fit.
If this group ever were to gain traction in CA I certainly HOPE to see a couple of Hexbearians in leadership.