no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 months agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down18
arrow-up1181arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 months agomessage-square9linkfedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down2·4 months agoI called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·4 months agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·4 months ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke