• masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You know, in some ways, I appreciate Musk. He has gone out of his way to demonstrate, for all to see, how billionaire parasites get to fail upward no matter how irredeemably incompetent and vile they happen to be.

    Scumwads like gates and Bezos hides it all behind walls of pr propaganda, but not Musk.

    I wonder what a cyberguillotine would look like.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Cyberguillotine is the door of the Cybertruck’s trunk, which famously has no sensor to block closing it when something is in the way, and is powerful and sharp enough to cut fingers.

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It can sense when something’s blocking it from closing all the way. It was just foolishly programmed to only pop back open a few times. Think it was the third or fourth was where it went into guillotine mode.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As much as I think the cybertruck is a stupid vehicle and agree that teslas are built like shit, from what I understand this isn’t an atypical amount of recalls for a new vehicle platform.

    Without even paying much attention the two I know of, the gas pedal and the finger slicer are unacceptable however.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Never let critical thought get in the way of our 2 minutes hate. This is about interpreting it in a way to justify our dislike, rather than whether the current thing actually does justify it.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can tell Elon is a genius because he gets people to pay to do prototype testing for him.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The folks at Some More News made a really great point: The truck segment is ripe for disruption. People who need trucks hate the monstrosities that truck companies are putting out. The Cybertruck, however, isn’t disrupting the market. It just looks weird. It’s just as heavy and big as other trucks.

      Imagine if a company put out a small truck. Not too powerful, not too big, good sight lines and a nice, big bed. That would be disruptive.

      Then again, I’m a Harbinger of Failure and listening to me is probably a bad idea. I assume people aren’t fucking idiots so maybe just build bigger and bigger trucks that are less and less useful

      • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        As a European. Most of the people don’t need a freaking truck. Big or small. In the rare cases you do need to move something, just rent a van. It will save you a lot of gas and money.

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Tesla engineers managers treating it like software. “Ship it and we can patch it in production.”

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I see Cybertrucks all the time. Everything about it is so ridiculous that I am genuinely embarrassed for the driver. I think it is the scale. If it was the size of a Hyundai Santa Cruz, the aesthetic might work…maybe. It just looks silly, gawdy, unfinished, and cheap.

  • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just dropping a link to the relevant, most recent upload from Some More News aka Cody’s Showdy. TL;DW: the cyber truck is an oversized, overpriced, unreliable, terrible design that’s dangerous to everybody in and around it.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We gotta stop calling software updates recalls. Yeah I get that it’s fun to bash on the Cybertruck but this isn’t really that interesting.

    Now that sticky accelerator pedal… yikes.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Recall is a legal term for the car industry which includes stuff like reporting obligations. So if the defect meets the severity level of a recall it should be called as such, even if it is ‘just’ a software update. Ambiguous terms for safety violations are dangerous and may cost lives.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Recall is also the plural term for a group of Cybertrucks.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Rear view cameras have been federally required on passenger vehicles since module year 2018 in the US market. So yeah, regardless of the error, it’s a recall because the result makes the vehicle noncompliant.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I still think its stupid that the requirements for that didnt require that they have a seperate screen from the dash, im convinced car manufacturers used it as an excuse to put fucken tablets in the dash. Congrats by trying to solve one problem ya made 50 others, especially since it makes it harder to remove the fucken tablet.

          I refuse to use the term infotainment except to say that I hate it and want to pour pitch on whoever came up with it.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can’t imagine the threshold here isn’t different though. If each of these recalls required hardware modifications Tesla would either hide the data or lawyers would be able to argue they weren’t major safety violations. I think it’s a plus that many things can be fixed expediantly with software updates and the threshold to do so is low.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          NHTSA are the ones who investigate safety issues and issue recall notices. Once they have done that then the manufacturer has very specific legal requirements to follow. Hiding data from them would eventually come to light, and that would be very bad. Look at the diesel emissions scandal for one example. Volkswagen payed billions in fines for that, and a dozen or so employees including the CEO have been indicted. A few have pled guilty and been sentenced to jail.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are also plenty of dumb, nearly inconsequential recalls on regular cars too. Including things like “place this warning sticker in your manual”. That’s a recall.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the one hand I agree, but also just because it can be fixed over the air doesn’t mean it’s not a major problem.

      Plus imagine if a car manufacturer put VERY shitty software into their cars. If a manufacturer has 100 recalls a year, I want to know why. If they have 1, I want to know why.

      Just because they are more easily fixed, doesn’t mean the recall isn’t important.