She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    TBH statements like this are hurting her odds more than helping. Everybody on board already knows those things about her, nothing about her policies.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think its less about changing the odds, and more about giving a needed morale boost to two minority groups long oppressed by politics in general.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You should probably be worried about our odds at this point in the game. We can celebrate her traits when she’s in.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh I’ve stopped worrying about the odds, pretty sure we are permafucked. I’d like to be wrong and it’s not going to keep me me from voting blue down the panel.

          Just that I know from my own experience cultural racism and misogyny is still a ridiculously powerful force, even among progressives.

          And you are giving the public way too much credit. Almost no one really cares about accomplishments when it really boils down to it. It is all about how a person makes one feel, and that is largely informed by media that is notably NOT them enacting their policies.

          Yes she has a good list of positive accomplishments, and has demonstrated her skill at statesmanship consistently to those who follow such things, but that isn’t your average voter. Or even your average swing voter.

          There isn’t nearly as much cultural awareness of her as there is of a certain pants-shitting spraytanned twice impeached and 34 time felon, and people are gullible and easily swayed.

          I want to be wrong because I in at least two groups of the people that cheetolini’s camp squads want to come after first, but I’ve already been acting on plans to get my family out of the country for the last 8 hours and I don’t plan on being on my home soil longer than it takes to vote in November and get on a plane.

          • Wilzax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you want to be wrong, shut up and help get literally anyone capable of the job into the oval office before Mr. Impeached for Insurrection gets another go at it

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nobody asked. Maybe go share your pathetic surrender in your own comment thread instead of attaching it as a reply to mine? Get some better feedback that way.

      • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        People of colour and what’s the second? Women aren’t a minority if you meant that.

  • VanillaBean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly more amped up more than ever that there’s a nominee under 60. God bless Biden for everything. That old turd Trump should realize he’s too old and drop out too.

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Someone asked me what I thought about Biden dropping out. I said, it doesn’t matter. I am over policy, specifically NOT horrible policies like Project 2025.

      So… like… what policies do you support?

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of us feel really bad about how we treat non-white races…

      Granted, a lot of us feel really good about it too…

      Either way, it weighs on us.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    WASHINGTON (AP) — She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

    A recent poll from the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about 6 in 10 Democrats believe Harris would do a good job in the top slot.

    She spoke often about attending demonstrations in a stroller and growing up around adults “who spent full time marching and shouting about this thing called justice.” In first grade, she was bused to school as part of the second class to integrate Berkeley public education.

    After graduating, Harris returned to the San Francisco Bay Area for law school and chose a career as a prosecutor, a move that surprised her activist family.

    Months into her tenure, Harris declined to seek the death penalty for the killer of a young police officer slain in the line of duty, fraying her relationship with city cops.

    In one memorable moment, she pressed now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on whether he knew any laws that gave government the power to regulate a man’s body.


    The original article contains 1,409 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 87%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does she support Netanyahu as unconditionally as Biden? I’ll vote for her anyway, but it would be nice if she actually took a stand against genocide. I’m probably asking too much, though.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ironically she’ll completely lose the black vote after enslaving them by imprisoning them over crimes like their children skipping school

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bro…did you not know?

        He doesn’t know everybody. Let’s let him figure this out on his own and see if his brain explodes.

        • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I suppose you’re saying that since Obama’s mother was white that makes him part-white, but that’s not really how race works in the US. Maybe it should be that way, maybe it shouldn’t, but right now it doesn’t.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wonder if you don’t understand the phrase “non-white”. Do you get that concept, or are you a glass half full kind of racist?

        • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          So to be extra simple about it, she’d be the first yellow-brown, where as Obama was white-brown.

          In terms of american racism its just the brown part that matters, that makes them both “black” and there was even past comments about Harris not being “black enough” or something to that effect.

          It makes more sense to call her the first Asian America that might be president if you want a “first” to claim.

        • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why doesn’t Obama’s blackness count? Does a little whiteness trump all his blackness for you?

          Do you see how fucking stupid this is yet? Everyone understands what you’re saying. It’s just dumb as fuck. Obama identifies as black. The country sees him as black. Many black folk identify him as black. You calling him white is a self-report by you.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      if she gets to the white house, I think it will be proudly said many, many more times.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      And first Indian or non-white President as well. Don’t know why people have trouble saying that.

      If she was Indian she wouldn’t be eligible to be president; they did say “South Asian decent” though.

      And are you saying Obama was white? I must be missing something here.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So some words we’re going to take strictly literally but some words were going to take with simple intention?

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Why would you think she’s literally from India? What tf are you even talking about.

            Did you also want to see Obamas Kenya birth certificate lol

            • ccunning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I was talking about the poster I was replying to expecting people to take “non-white” in a very literal way, meanwhile using “Indian” in a non-literal way.

              Like, who complains about a news outlet not referring to her as Indian when they did say “South Asian decent”?

              Anyway, they’re no longer the top comment and have been downvoted appropriately, so I’m not really worried about it any more.

              Sorry if I offended you, though. Wasn’t trying to be offensive.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ah gotcha, I see what you mean now.
                Oh no worries my friend. Same here.
                I really have to stop going into political posts for a few months.

                Enjoy your evening

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There are TWO people in here not knowing something that should be known. What in the actual fuck.

        Also, how old are you? I’d like to know so I can place my mental shame on whatever generation doesn’t know who is eligible to be president in the US. It makes me awfully sad.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Dude, it’s a matter of linguistics and ethnic identity. Everyone here knows Obama has a white mother. You’re just being intentionally combative and taking advantage of the fact that most people - including Obama himself - identify him as black.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, I’m obviously being combative by pointing out that Kamala Harris is non-white, and would be the first such President and it’s a big deal, and then giving shit to the few who tried to bring up Obama and didn’t realize he was half white.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Figured this is what you meant. Imagine invoking the reverse One Drop Rule and thinking you have the superior position.

                • qprimed@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  bright spot. a bunch of readers knew exactly what you meant and went “huh! thats pretty cool.”

            • kescusay@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Again, this is just linguistics games. Obama is the first non-white president if your definition of “non-white” is something like, “A person whose ethnicity/ethnic identity is something other than white.” Assuming she wins, Harris will be the first non-white president if your definition of “non-white” is something like, “A person whose ancestry does not include any Caucasians.”

              Or rather, she would be if her father didn’t have any Caucasian ancestry. But he does. You knew that, didn’t you? Didn’t you?

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                No, Obama was the first Black President, sure. But he was not the only non-white President.

                Maybe to you, but it’s not. It’s a huge thing that she is the first non-white President. Nobody in the populous gives a shit what they identify as. In her case, she’s black and Indian, and any voters who identify with that will feel less disenfranchised about her winning.

                What you’re describing is some weird Rachel Dolezol shit. Nobody wants that.

                • kescusay@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh, for fuck’s sake… No, what I’m describing is a logical problem with your statements.

                  First, let’s get this out of the way: Race is a social construct. We differentiate between “black” and “white” in large part because of racism. Ta-Nehisi Coates has written a lot about how without racism, we wouldn’t perceive each other as different because of such a tiny variation as the color of our skin, and I tend to think he’s right. Concepts of race, as opposed to minor genetic variance, are predicated on racism.

                  With that said, when you call someone “non-white,” you can mean it in the technical sense of not having Caucasian ancestry, which applies to neither Obama nor Harris (which I’m positive you didn’t know until now, since you’ve been calling her “non-white” in this sense), or you can mean it in the sense of a social construct, which applies to both Obama and Harris.

                  There is no definition of “non-white” that applies to one, but not the other. Both have some Caucasian ancestry. Both are perceived socially as non-white because of how their bodies express certain alleles. Pick one definition and stick to it.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          to be fair, i’m in the US. i heard it on the BBC Global News Podcast ;)

          i like to hear global takes on our dumpster fire domestic events

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just meant from US outlets. Everyone is focusing on either female, or black components. She’s a fucking person, CNN, just address all the things, FFS. If anything, that should lock in MORE votes, so I hope the campaign is out front and center making this a thing.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              if i were to speculate, it’s because Biden heavily carried the black vote in 2020 and that has been majorly slipping this time around-- something the DNC is very much hoping to capture with a Harris nomination. Now, I’m no pollster, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that works.

              many voters don’t know that she’s of Indian heritage and just incorrectly assume she’s of African ancestry. Presumably, that’s why there hasn’t been much of a public effort to make a correction.

              • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                She wasn’t carrying the black vote when she ran in the 2020 primary. Her record shows her to be staunchly pro establishment. She wasn’t progressive as a prosecutor or as Attorney General, she opposed and obstructed police reform in California when she was in the best position to get anything done. Maybe black voters will ultimately back her if she gets nominated but her support among black voters isn’t a good argument for nominating her because it isn’t strong.

  • III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I fear a Harris win. Not because I don’t want her to win. But because if the likes of Trump was the conservative response to Obama… I can’t fathom the horrible person they will come up with in response to Kamala.

  • woop_woop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Nah, she’s never been a contender. Unless the DNC rallies behind her and the rest of us agree, she will be a small blip on the radar as she was before being put into the VP spot

    • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hopefully there is potency in someone who can speak full and coherant sentences! :-D You may be right but at the very least it’ll be nice to hear lucid speech again and we’ll soon see if it’s actually effective in the current climate! Wow the bar has been set low!?

      • woop_woop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well this is just a silly take. Have you not watched the state of the unions during bidens presidency? He was a decent politician. That includes speeches.

        • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh he definitly WAS. Still can be on occasion. But the debate, trailing of into incoherance. Recent major gafs mixing up Putin and Zelensky and mixing up Trump and Kamala Harris?! His interview after the debate was better but not great and the harsh fact is that he’s as good as he will ever be right now and only going to get worse with time. As for the other person I was really mostly referring to, Trump has been a babbling, gush of incoherrancy for years!

      • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because dems’ only chance to win is to get non voters off their asses, which she won’t do. If people who regularly vote are holding their noses and voting for her to beat Trump, non voters won’t turn up at all.

        • III@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          These “non voters” are bunch of fickle assholes. “I won’t vote because Biden is old” “I won’t vote because Biden supports genocide”… Okay, how about a young candidate who doesn’t support genocide. “Oh…uh… hold on, I need to check the online troll posts to come up with a reason… oh, I won’t vote for Harris because (any reason they can find)”

          They aren’t going to vote at all, they just want attention. No one should court them or care about them. Their only impact is to help Trump win with their nay saying. I say fuck those pieces of shit.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You realize that people like you are just helping the Republicans win by pushing Democrats not to vote because “it’s a lost cause anyway”? Then again, it’s probably what you’re wishing for.