They could save millions by that move
they’re typically sociopaths, narcissists, or both. other people hardly exist
Lots of people are saying that AI isn’t that good, and that’s absolutely true.
To your question though, AI has been doing better at running companies than CEOs.
Who would’ve thought that the machine that’s great at making shit up and running with it would be good at the “job” of people that make shit up and run with it.
While AI is not good, people seem to have forgotten the fact that CEOs are also not good…and are complete idiots.
Same reason religions demand you tithe but refuse to pay taxes, even though they don’t deny Christ said, “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is God’s,” which is to say, fulfil your obligations to the government before fulfilling your obligations to God.
jesus confirmed shitlib
That’s a wild understanding but you do you
What part do you think is wild exactly? The rendering or the same reason bit?
That’s not what that verse means. It means leave government stuff to government and God centered stuff to God. He was differentiating between God and the government.
I love how there are so many meanings, and everyone believes theirs is the right one.
That’s certainly not a “wild understanding” as the other commenter describes it. I’ve heard that interpretation taught since I was a child to mean pay your taxes. And what are these religions telling you not to pay your taxes?
I think the use of “before” is debateable.
I never used that word.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
If AI was anywhere close to that good, they wouldn’t be encouraging the masses to use it, they would be hoarding access for their own benefit.
I think you already know the answer because you asked the question.
The CEOs are the ones trying to convince everyone (investors really) that AI can replace humans to try to increase profits. That’s it.
LLMs/AI are fantastic tools, but that’s all they are. Just tools. The CEOs are selling the AI revolution fantasy.
Because it’s not that good.
AI is an excuse. AI is an excuse to: reduce staff, hoard resources, sustain dependency on a rental economy, stifle creatives (who might have subversive messages!), surveil the world quickly by summarizing huge amounts of cloud stored files, create false evidence, cast doubt on real evidence, fleece investors, and finally, convince everyone you’re “the NEXT Bill Gates/tech messiah”
Why couldn’t these fuckers just sink their money into fusion instead? We need that way more badly.
That’s not really how it’s working out. What we’ll see more of are companies that are created using AI, where the people are basically working absolutely essential positions, while the AI handles most of the “executive” functions. The simple idea of AI coming in and “replacing” the CEO isn’t how it’s happening.
Why do I need the AI company at all if I can just have their AI program a replacement AI for me?
The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.
Those poor tools sound like they don’t get used very often.
They will
One of the weird things about ceos, in USA at least, is that one of their roles is to be the fall guy for the board if things go badly. If they screw up badly enough, it’s expected that they’ll find it hard to be hired as CEO elsewhere, which they use to justify outsize compensation plans. I’m not sure AI would fulfill that role, nor the schmoozing aspects
I’m my experience it’s pretty uncommon for a CEO to struggle finding a new position no matter what transpired at their previous company. Golden parachutes and failing upwards are way more common
It’s not that good.
Much of a CEO’s role is schmoozing with other rich assholes. AI can’t do that. Maybe once it can buy hookers and blow.
Every LLM bot I have tried is an expert at schmoozing. Even when I don’t want it to
AI can’t roll around in a pool full of money.
Wait until they virtually roll in crypto.
