Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, giving the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don’t like. President Trump himself has said that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president’s desk.

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    6 months ago

    OK so this is meant for revenge porn / stolen photos… but it’s written so broadly that it will affect basically any online speech. Great.

    • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 months ago

      it passed. it fucking passed. i don’t think people realize what they’re about to use this for (or at least they don’t fully realize the implications).

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They all did along with all but two Republicans. Funny how they have no problem working together on stuff like this, but when it comes to anything that helps the American people suddenly there’s a ton of manufactured controversy as if we were watching a scripted pro wrestling match.

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    Call it what it is: a censorship law. Apparently the climate of fear that makes people self-censor wasn’t enough.

    Watch for a LOT of ‘extreme left’ opinions get taken down and their authors imprisoned.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      It won’t stop with journalists and authors. They’ll be looking in Facebook posts, Reddit comments, Twitter threads, Instagram, etc. And random citizens are going to start disappearing.
      They’ll want people to know it can happen to anyone, not just the most visible or high profile critics.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The NSA mass surveillance program that Snowden blew the whistle on was found unconstitutional during Obama II. THAT SAME AFTERNOON, the Republican Congress and Senate passed the (I shit you not, this is what this MF is named) USA FREEDOM ACT that basically re-instantiated the program and Obama signed it straightaway. Turns out, they were able to get shit done quick and in a hurry when the shit was fascism.

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Politicians are still too afraid of optics, they don’t want to be on record as voting against taking down revenge porn. Too many of these bills are written with a good-sounding premise but the details are where they get you.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yet they are happy to hand the criminal who is actively shooting people another loaded weapon because “optics”.

          They are the kind of people that say you should stay with a partner that rapes and abuses you because it might make family gatherings weird if you complain.
          Fuck those people.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    While this is bullshit, we should be able to weaponize it right back at them - any lies the administration spews (which let’s face it, that’s everything) needs to be reported relentlessly.

    Make them feel it!

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not a rumor, only 2 house members voted against (both republican).

      mfw we can pass a bipartisan spy law no problem but a bipartisan daylight savings law is still too hard.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      She did. She ‘objected to some of the wording’ but jumped in line like a good little puppet.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Her and Bernie won’t acknowledge palestinian defenders in their rallies. Puppets to the bone like all the others, just another form of controlled opposition.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Flood the zone” benefits both parties when it comes to power grab shit like this. This barely made headlines until it was already passed and it’s too late.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good news, now we can report all those christians online that won’t shut the fuck up!!

  • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN

    I am confused. The title say congress passed the bill while the article says the house is the one that passed it (so congress should be next).

    Which is it?

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 months ago

      Congress is the combination of the House of Representatives and the Senate. America has a bicameral legislature. (Congress=House of Reps + Senate)

      Because this passed the Senate in Feb and the House recently it is correct to say that this bill has passed Congress.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah but the DMCA was vaguely reasonable. This is meant to be weaponized.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        the DMCA was vaguely reasonable

        No it wasn’t. It too was MEANT to be weaponized from day one. The difference is that almost all of the people in control of both parties and all mainstream media were in favor, so it got a false veneer of reasonability in coverage.

        The DMCA is just as bad as SOPA and PIPA, which was always the intent from the powerful industry groups lobbying for all three bills and the politicians they own.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you mean the communications decency act? Most of that has been found to be unconstitutional as will likely be the fate of this bill…

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    American decline is happening at a much faster pace than I anticipated.

    If you don’t own a gun, now is the time.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The democrats pushed this through for the same reason they’ve pushed other bills to censor the internet, using piracy or CSAM as excuses. They aren’t really trying to protect anyone, they want and need control over the population as much as the republicans do, so that they can maintain the cash flow from corporations that own them. So many people still look at the democrats as an opposition party to the fascists, but that isn’t true at all. They work together because they’re two sides of the same party. The only thing they’re truly concerned with protecting is their own money and power.

    Both the democrats and republicans are profoundly evil.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Republicans pass legislation through the two houses of Congress they entirely control, a Republican president signs it.

      You: “The Democrats pushed this through.”

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This reminds me of the DNC super donor Ed Buck who would lure in gay black men and kill them by injecting meth into them while raping them.

    He managed to do it for years and wasn’t until one of the victims survived to be able talk about it that he was sentenced as with every previous body it was said it was a private issue and a sad loss of a friend.
    Photos managed to get shared of his racist, rape, death den helping sway the public.

    Ed Buck would have loved this bill and its ability to actively scrub his image further.
    If it feels like monsters would like something I don’t want it.