• b000rg@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    11 days ago

    I don’t get how these people even feel comfortable driving something where you can’t see the road that’s in front of you for 10+ meters out. I just wouldn’t feel safe, there could be any kind of obstruction you can’t see on the road from 10m away but will still fuck up your day and/or life.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      As a truck driver I get it. It’s nice to see more. The tradeoff isn’t worth it and not why they do it. I would bet my paycheck they never take it off road either. Which would be the only good reason to raise something that much. Truckers have a good reason to. They have giant engine and transmissions that need to last for the industrial work involved.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        cabovers are almost exclusively used throughout europe and asia. it’s only america and australia that tends to use the big bonnet american style trucks.

        there no real reason for it

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 days ago

          To be fair the regulations on vehicle length and older infrastructure makes the cabover popular.

          American style trucks(long nose) get better mileage on longer hauls than the blunt nose design. They also provide more cabin room. As a final note American audiences are conditioned for the long nose design and it’s difficult to find the imports here.

          Having driven both I think they both have merit. In Europe an American truck would be impossible to maneuver in towns.

          So that’s the “real reason for it”.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          A lot of trucking is long-range. America is fucking big and not everywhere is served by ports, railroads, and tributaries.

          Those roof-scoops and curvaceous hoods aren’t just for being sexy. They greatly increase aerodynamics and with it, range.

          The important thing is that it requires specialized training and a license to drive something with such poor visibility. The pickups, any 16yo kid can legally drive.

        • numanair@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          I think there is a legal reason for no cabovers in the USA. Maybe something based on crash safety (for just the occupants of course).

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          There is a reason in Australia, the distances travelled and the enormous loads they haul require far more powerful trucks. Look up road trains. They are significantly more efficient than using multiple trucks.

          Trains would be more efficient but Australia is too large and too sparsely populated to do everything with trains.

          They are also safer for the driver than the Cab over style.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s simple uneducated hubris. Nothing bad could ever happen to them because they are a Good American.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 days ago

      Agreed, but some people drive that way. It’s their road, get out of the way. I had a 1996 Dodge dually long ago for pulling a trailer, and its visibility wasn’t very bad, except for around the damn side columns. I got into the habit of leaning forward and back as I would turn so that I had some idea of what was being blocked. At one point we had considered upgrading to the big trucks like the F-450/F550, and I got into one to see what it was like. I could see EVERYTHING. I was like, holy shit, this is luxury.

      • b000rg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 days ago

        Side columns like that should be illegal. I was driving my stepdad’s '21 Silverado 1500 crew cab a few weeks ago and was totally blown away when I almost pulled out in front of someone coming from the right in a big ass truck.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        This attitude is really prevalent here. As in you don’t really need to see the road, just the car in front.

        People scream blue bloody murder about bikes on the road.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      Looking at those dumbfucks driving their emotional support vehicle in the city, they don’t seem to be comfortable

      They are driving slow and can’t stay in their lane, as they can’t judge the distances correctly

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      If they thought about things and came to good conclusions afterwards, they probably wouldn’t be driving this kind of car to begin with. The people who are driving it are probably not good thinkers.