• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s really amazing how much damage his loss probably did to the world.

    I can’t think of any pro-wildlife “influencers” that would be at his level today, much less wherever he would have reached in the remaining years.

    • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      In the anglosphere maybe, which most of Lemmy seems to represent. I come across countless legends doing the same work but without the same recognition. When Greta Thunberg, who I admire, became big I read an article about all the people around her age that have been doing the same campaigning. They were mostly indigenous people so nobody came along with a TV show for them.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I shudder to think that Greta is attributed to Conservation in the same breath as Steve Irwin!

        Greta should be at home and in school and preparing to live her life as an adult. If she as an adult became a climate activist and held the Top-7 or Top-10 or Top-20 corporations accountable, sure that would be commendable.

        Nothing gets done blaming others and taking no action yourself.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          She’s 21. she’s been an adult for a few years now. She is still a climate activist and is still holding corporations accountable and she is still commendable.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      David Attenborough’s narrations for nature docs, maybe? But that’s not really the same as watching a wildlife fanatic like Steve Irwin.

      He has a son that seems eager to follow in his footsteps, so maybe he’ll fill that void one day.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But getting that kind of popularity is like being struck by lightning, especially now. He had a very advantageous start on TV (not to belittle how amazing he was).

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cold uncaring universe MFers realizing we are not separate from the universe and are, in fact, the universe itself observing, bettering, and caring about itself.

  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is why I get so mad when people say “we don’t have an overpopulation problem, we have a resource allocation problem”.

    No. There are not supposed to be this many fucking humans. Where the fuck are the animals supposed to live???

    We need to return to preindustrial population levels so the animals can too

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you had half as many humans in the world, but they all lived in suburbs, it would be much worse for the environment than having twice as many humans but they all live in cities.

      Compare America to India. If Americans lived the way Indians do, the population would be absolutely fine. So if you want to solve overpopulation problems, stop the American style suburbs before you worry about the actual population.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actual Indian here, please DO NOT live the way Indians live in India. The worst unplanned urban sprawl and urban density and squatting and squalor and slums :-(

        If you are referring to the Ancient Civilization of local produce and local distribution and local Kingdom Tithes to the Empire while living in villages and the concentrating political, commercial and military power in the major cities. Education “institutes” in deep forest with no “fees” but labor for classes. Since that type of Civilization did once exist and thrived before being wiped out by repeated invasions and conquerors. Most definitely there were social and technology issues, but the slow pace of development did not destroy the landscape.

        Medicine, Technology, Transportation, Global Trade need tempering with ecological ethical and sustainable standards of implementation, research and development.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I’m not idolizing the actual conditions of India, just pointing out an exception to what the person above is talking about.

          My ideal society would be a solarpunk version of soviet block housing with tons of bike paths and trams and high speed intercity rail. Cars and meat would be banned, but everyone would have gigabit fiber internet and induction stovetops. Also the thermal and sonic insulation would be fantastic

          • maniii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Soviet blocks are definitely better than urban sprawl when the maintenance and facilities are top-notch.

            Taking the single issue of Transportation pollution, when India was in lockdown during covid, we had pollution-free skies, and lo-and-behold the regular rains and normal weather patterns not seen for more than 40 or 50 years returned ! Human transport pollution is the worst in India.

            One of the first things Indian/foreign companies did was force workers to mandatorily return to office locations which increases transportation pollution by the bazillions as vehicles are needed to shuttle people, materials and maintenance for everything. And all these corporations talk the big talk of how ESG they are.

      • Bye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure but all those humans need an insane amount of farmland that dwarfs the amount of land they need for housing. And that’s ignoring meat consumption.

        With a huge population, beef consumption is insane and is destroying the world.

        With a small population, it isn’t a big deal.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That amount of farmland is a lot less if you’re not raising livestock and throwing out perfectly good food because it isn’t profitable. A vegan socialist society has a much higher population ceiling than a carnist capitalist society.

  • leaveWitX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Humanity’s ability to repair and control is far from being able to keep up with its destructive power

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Evolution just needs to kick the rest of the animals into high gear and do some defcon 1 shit, like making seaguls venomous and thirsty for human blood, or inventing funnel-webbed Taipans that can fly and open doors. New airborne bacteria that feeds exclusively on the human optic nerve, and daffodil pollen that causes category 5 cytokine storms.

    Level the fucking playing field.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    “So what I’m going to do is travel around the world and harass animals for television.”

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol, people downvoted you, but you are 100% correct. He basically tortured wild animals for profit and popularity.

      And these humans celebrate him for it.