• darvocet@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    … but it’s just a few bad apples. Most cops are very fine people.

    Edit: /s Jesus

      • darvocet@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I was hopeful the two separate clues - “just a few bad apples” plus “very fine people on both sides” would be a banger. Maybe it was just too good.

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Nah it’s because there are people who actually believe that shit so it’s hard to gauge sarcasm.

          It’s a lot like how people make jokes about landlords. A lot of the people are being sarcastic but there’s enough of them that are serious that you can’t really tell the difference.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      The original intent of that metaphor is correct in your use, but it’s rarely recognized. It began as “a rotten apple quickly infects its neighbor.” Over time, it became “one bad apple ruins the bunch.” Now it’s used as just “one bad apple” to infer minimal or selective corruption, completely discrediting the point of the analogy.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s also worth noting the implication of the full phrase. If you remove the bad apples quickly enough, then you can save the rest. If you can remove the corrupt elements, then you can protect the group overall. If you leave them to fester then you’ll have a lot more cutting required to clean up.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The problem that brings up the idea of no good cops is, if these 23 other cops are good, and this one is bad, why is there still the bad cop? Why do the other 23 not push that bad cop out?

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s kind of ironic that you had to add the /s since most people never think to finish the adage.

      A few bad apples spoil the bunch

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Like “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”, its full meaning has been cut off in order to support the opposite point.

  • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can we take a second to appreciate that those hands were drawn very well? Like, most times I draw a hand, it just ends up looking like a stupid blob, but this poster has gotten the shape and proportions pretty decently. And not just once, but twice. Good.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even worse. The police has both the authority and the budget to:

    1. Test candidates before they hire them as cops.
    2. Train their cops.
    3. Discipline the violent cops.

    Protest organizers can’t do these things. Anyone who wants to join the protest just needs to arrive at the appointed time and place, and if they behave badly - the ones allowed to punish them are not the protest organizers but the police.

  • Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Its even more true when the most violent in a protest are working with the cops or are cops themselves.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fine message, but if you have 33 words on your protest sign you’re really missing the mark.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      At least they got the words neatly written and balanced on the cardboard, and the fists are drawn better than on your average cardboard sign.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Facts. The amount of horribly, illegibly scrawled messages you see at protests. Luckily the worst offenders don’t tend to make it onto social media, understandably.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re making a sign, not writing the abstract to a political science paper. You get like a dozen syllables, max.

        • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Maybe when we didn’t have phones to constantly take photos, but you could literally take a picture of many “too long” signs and read them at your own pace.

            • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              As I just did with the post yes. Someone took a picture of the sign to look at later, and I enjoyed it.

              Now imagine taking a picture of a bunch of signs at once.

              Edit: it’s like, you can go to a museum and take a picture of a long description then go sit down nearby. I like looking at things but your boys got back problems haha

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      am I the only one who counted? it’s only 25. you could have used the real number you lazy ass.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Meanwhile someone else is upvoted for “If your beliefs fit on a sign, think harder.”

    • Leg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      People don’t stop being people just because they’re wearing different clothes, you goober.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    So close to being self aware. What happens when you reverse the roles with the same logic then? Judging a police force for their most violent cops but not judging a demonstration for their most violent participants is what? Are you suddenly a ‘freedom fighter’ because you believe your cause is just? History proves the worst people always think their path forward is the righteous one. I really wish we’d stop getting distracted by this shit and fight against the real oppressors of us all: The wealthy.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m 14 and that’s deep. Way to sidestep the actual point.

        The counter to hypocrisy is to be principled, yet that sign seems to accuse people of the exact thing it represents. I’ll ask again, if your enemies are oppressors, does that make you a self-claimed freedom fighter? Rebel? Or something less flattering - Terrorist.