In a democracy, I don’t see how their vote really matters less. Plus it’ll help improve prisons perhaps.

  • drislands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can’t remember where I heard this originally, but I subscribe to the belief that you need to maintain the rights of criminals (like voting) to prevent tyranny.

    Because if being labeled a criminal is enough to remove your rights, a corrupt government need only declare you one to take your rights away.

    It used to be criminal in some parts of the USA for black and white people to intermarry, for example. Imagine losing your right to vote because of who you married.

    • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It was Nelson Mandela:

      A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.

      To be honest I was shocked when I learned about this stripping of rights when you are imprisoned in the US. It is literally a tool of tyranny to lock people up in order to silence them.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        there are states that have government employees who engage with prisoners and get them back into a eligible voter status. sadly not all of the USA believes in Democracy.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        And that’s precisely why I can’t own a gun! I got framed for some bullshit and compelled to plea guilty probably because I’m vocal enough to end up on someone’s list.

      • Legend@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Woah so that’s where jkr stole that quote from always thought dumbledore had really good quotes and now i know jkr must’ve stolen most of em .

        • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think there’s anything at all original in JKR works. Mashing a bunch of fantasy tropes together into an interesting world seems to have worked though. At least, the films are decent.

          • Legend@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I like the books but yeah there definetly is massive issues that the movies fixed like harry breaking the fucking wand aside from that i’d say the books are on par if not better than the movies .

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’d guess it’s probably from a curated Tumblr post which I’ll paraphrase:

      “Every criminal deserves rights”

      “Except pedophiles, they’re true scum”

      “Yes, also pedophiles”

      “You’re a piece of shit”

      “If pedophiles don’t have rights, then everyone they want to not have rights will be declared a pedophile. For example, transgender people, queer people, liberals, and more have all been accused of preying on children”

      “Oh.”

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Meanwhile pedophiles, knowing they’re taboo, go to great lengths to be undetected and therefore never seek treatment and cause more harm.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      In Canada voting is considered a Charter Right (or basic level of freedom nessisary to preserving human dignity and right of participation in society). While I keep pushing for voting reform regarding the first past the post system it’s definitely something I think we got right. Everyone should decide what sort of society we live in including those who have run afoul of it in some way or another.

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      What do you think of France, UK, Italy and China? Because a prisoners right to vote can be removed in those countries as well.

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Whatabout the UK, France, and China?

        The UK whose flailing neo-fascist government just passed a law allowing it to deport refugees to Rwanda? Whose government is about to experience a historic blowout at the polls? Whose government destroyed their economy by pulling them out of the EU to try to regain the glory of the empire? That UK?

        France with is neoliberal government? Macaron had spent so much time attacking workers and their rights to steal from the rich and give to the poor that he’s almost handed the counry to the fascist brownshirts of Marine Le Pen?

        This Italy? ?

        And China?

        I believe I said, “civilized countries”.

        • Avg@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m very familiar with what aboutism, and that’s not what I intended to do with my question.

          This forum has many biases and I feel that for us to have an opinion on an issue it should be applied to all equitably and not just because the party someone hates does it.

          I don’t disagree with the topic, I just disagree with how you stated it.

          • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            In civilized countries every citizen has the right to vote and equal access to the ballot box. The US has neither of those things. I stand by what I said.

      • gaael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        In France we treat our prisoners like utter shit. If they way you treat the people you have power over is an important marker of civilization/democracy (and I believe it is), we fail this test real hard.

        That being said, the tribunal has to specifically add to the prison sentence an exclusion from the right to vote. Iirc, about 25k prisoners (among the 75 or 80k total) have been deprived from the right to vote during their sentence.

        Voting from prison in France is complicated,there are 3 options afaik:

        • you can delegate your vote to someone on the outside
        • you can resquest a “day off” to go to the polls
        • since 2019 you can vote by correspondance

        The “can I please go out to vote” has to be approved by the warden, and dosen’t happen much.
        Delegating your vote isn’t always easy either, prison has a tendancy to isolate people from their former close ones.
        The correspondance vote is recent and seems like the best of the three. In 2017 (presidential electio ), less than 2% of imprisoned people had voted. In the 2022 presidential election, more than 20% of them did.

        So far, voting logistics and the feeling that society doesn’t want you has imo prevented far more people to vote than the “you can’t vote for the next x years” addendum to sentences.

  • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    But if you let prisoners vote, you’d have to let the black ones vote too. And if you did that, there’d be next to no point in locking them up in the first place.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bruh, the democracy in my country is a joke and even we have votes on prisons, what the hell? I thought this was standard.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      I thought this was standard.

      I think a lot of Americans don’t share that belief.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        The War On Black People Drugs created a generation of people entirely fine with the idea that not only do prisoners not have rights, they deserve to suffer out of prison as well.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll go one further, voting should be mandatory, punishable by a fine. The ballot should also have “none of the above” as an option.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If one is a citizen of a country the right to vote should be the same as the right to breathe air.

    The only qualification should be citizenship.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I can see the argument that when someone has committed a felony, you are taking them out of society as punishment. However once they’ve done their time and re-enter society, they have all the rights and privileges

      Geez, connect this with the previous article on “pay to stay” debt, combine it with background searches for most jobs and debt …… how the heck does anyone come back from even a short sentence? If we’re making it unnecessarily difficult to reintegrate, how are we surprised when they fall?

    • Flax@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      One of my really unpopular opinions is that the voting age should be removed as well, but that’s for another post 😏

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        My unpopular opinion is that the average person is too stupid to be allowed to vote lol

        • Flax@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do suppose that’s how brexit happened

          But everyone who disagrees with me is stupid as well so 🤭

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re correct, but I don’t think this is an actually unpopular opinion, is it?

  • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even if not while they are in prison, definitely once they have served their time. Absolute bullshit that you can never vote again once you’ve done time. (Federal crimes I mean)

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It’s a seriously bad idea to remove imprisoned people’s rights even though point of prison is to remove rights to freedom of movement.

    Why it’s bad is because if you remove voting or communication rights then it opens the door to removing those rights with laws targeted at a minority. If a certain minority votes against you you can find a behavior in than group and make it illegal.

    Black people in the US were especially targeted with this because of the War on Drugs as an example.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is one of those posts that make me think “but that’s already how it works” and then I remember “oh right, America”.

  • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    In many countries they do vote!

    Restriction of personal freedom and restriction of citizen rights are two different forms of punishments, ideally useful in different circumstances. But I guess thiie US applies them jointly?

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The US loves to disenfranchise prisoners and felons, because the US has carefully throughout its history jiggered the system so that black people are significantly more likely to wind up as prisoners and felons. Felon disenfranchisement became suspiciously popular among US states immediately following the Civil War. No points for guessing why.

      The situation has improved somewhat recently, with many states (although most of them not in the deep south…) relaxing laws and allowing previously convicted people to have their voting rights restored either automatically or via some process. To my knowledge, however, only two states allow incarcerated people to vote: Maine and Vermont.

      • acetanilide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In Texas, incarcerated people can technically vote by mail. But they have to apply (and can’t be felons)

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    BuT WhaT iF tHey VOTe To FRee aLL pRiSONErs???

    And to your second point: if people were trying to improve prisons, they wouldn’t be so damn lucrative

    • Flax@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They don’t have the right proportion to do that. And if they did, then maybe it would actually be a valid vote

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Who better and more motivated to effect the law than those who have been wronged by it?