That Firefox logo was simplified, but not oversimplified. Even with a very small icon size you can still tell it’s a fox that is (on?) fire. The Firefox Family logo is oversimplified, just being a swoosh, basically.
well the family logo is supposed to be as simple as possible
I beg to differ. Until now I never noticed the fox in the logo. And even now that I know it’s there I have a hard time finding it. And I’m looking at a version of almost 1cm on my screen.
Well, I suppose it makes sense that it doesn’t apply to everyone, but my guess is that the majority can still see the fox.
Either way, the simplification of modern logos is a necessity, because they are used in small UI elements, often even appearing monochrome. At which point they still need to be recognizable. Whether they are simplified in a good or bad way, is subjective though.
Never forget what they took from us
I still think the 2017 logo was their best, like a nice middle ground between this version and the current one:
I like this one. New ones missing the paw and has an odd tail end to me.
Those bastards cut off his arm!
deleted by creator
This gives me the warm fuzzies
I liked this so much more! It was cute and charming.
The new logo looks so office neutral/corporate friendly.
I used to not like the new Firefox logo when it first came out, but by now, I couldn’t do with the old one, it looks so much… And I bet if they changed it back, it would take me 2 months max to switch opinions right back.
At some point I have to accept, I’m just an ape of habit.
Honestly, its considered a hot-take but I do like minimalistic logos cause they are easier to recognize. Also they tend to better fit with the rest of the UI and products.
Counterpoint is the bullshit Google did with all their icons. Same exact colors with different shapes makes quick differentiation an actual challenge.
That’s gotta be an icon pack, given the black and the weird colors. Am I wrong? Did they change it since I last used the stock icons?
And then they introduced to android a new option that only showed the shape of the icon in two tones. Now they have no colour and are just odd shapes.
Why does Drive not match the color tone of the rest of them? It’s so muted.
Although the icons are kinda not minimal with the amount of colors in there, they could have like made one app with one or two colors and the other with different ones
It all depends on context. The Firefox logo is good and fine as a brand logo you can put on the product website, big enough, or the about dialog. But as an application icon I dislike it. I would prefer a simpler, more recognizable, flat-colored version.
I generally agree. However, for the MDN Web docs icon, I’m not sure I’ll ever acclimate to that one, even with how often I see it. so bad. Love MDN still though
The new reddit logo is pretty awful but both Firefox logos are fine IMO. They are both pretty well done, just in different styles.
Yup, the design for Firefox’s logo is just a million times better than reddit’s, simplification arguments aside. FF just did a much better job.
Are they trying to fool investors that it’s a messaging service? The little tail on the bubble makes it look like a WhatsApp ripoff.
Snoo looks like they have a beard now…
Which better represents the people on reddit. That’s good innit?
I seem to be the only one who likes the new Firefox logo. It’s way more colorful!
The new logo looks sleek and nice, but I personally just really like more complex logos.
∆
I think the same. The old logo also had a weird Nintendo 64-like 3D.
personally I think it’s not bad, but I still haven’t gotten used yo it
tbh it smh feels like they just changed it a month ago, idk when they actually changed it
You are not alone, we just don’t meme about it.
I like the new Firefox logo though. Except little foxy needs it’s paw back.
needs its* paw back
Apostrophy for possessive is OK. Iirc, it’s just uncommon on “it’s” solely to differentiate between “it is”. I know for a fact this is what I was taught in college and still have the English book. Some teachers and books written by those teachers pretend there never was a hard rule for possessive apostrophies.
For example, the AP styling guide says do not add an extra ‘s’ for singular possessive when the word already ends in s or z, but traditional English rules say do it.
Yeah, it gets complicated when formal rules can just be made up. I had a group of professors who published a little sheet saying, “These are the ways we like it, but unless it’s truly horrendous, you aren’t getting knocked for it.” Their rule was something along the lines of pre-Roman fall, names that ended in -s don’t get an extra ‘s, but afterwards they do. So Jesus’, but Aquinas’s… /shrug
Let’s talk about the real issue, how do I make proper boundaries that are singular and possessive plural? Imagine a restauranted Pop’s. Is it Pop’ses?
Well, it’s obviously Pop’ses’s.
Is Pop’ses is the plural, the plural possessive would be Pop’ses’
OP: „I don’t like change.“
The new reddit icon looks like when kids draw on teeth for giggles.
deleted by creator
The Reddit one looks like if they made a mobile game that’s just another Candy Crush clone.
overcomplification
I think the new Reddit logo is hilarious. It looks like Snoo has a stubble. What’s up Snoo? drinking much?
Let’s talk about this stupid “Let’s put a useless white background under our icons” trend.
Be honest, which looks better?
The right answer.
Oh hey it’s the maps logo, or is that the calendar logo? Nah it’s the files logo. I guess it could be the photos logo…
Really great when I’m trying to find something in a hurry.
Google forgor about PNGs 💀
Google also forgot about WebP. A format they created.
Jpeg xl baby!
Often, I associate a logo change with a change in what the brand wants. The older Reddit logo is associated with a time Reddit was good, and the new one is associated with Spez’s greed. Same with the Android logo, and many others.
Hot shit I thought the reddit design was a joke, that’s awful.
