“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard of Williamson. Those charts say she’s polling in the single digits and is only ahead of some dude named Phillips that I’ve never heard of.

      Not sure where you’re getting your 10x or even 2x numbers.

      OP didn’t mean some rando that no one’s ever heard of. “The guy running against Biden” meant the only other person with any chance of being president in 2025

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think those graphs say what you think they do. Unless you haven’t noticed that blue line way at the top.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Obviously the incumbent is polling at 80%+, I’m just saying that Phillips is even less likely to challenge Biden than Williamson, so there’s really no point in saying he’s even worse than Biden.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it funny that people trot her out as if she’s some solution here. Will you be telling gay men who loathe her for minimizing AIDS to suck it up and vote for her?