Hey do anybody know where you get a tv that supports 4k and does not have that locked up smarttv shit?

If there are none, does anybody know a tv that boots fast(less than 30 seconds) and displays an hdmi input by default without the need to choose the input from a menu.

Thanks in advance.

And sorry if I am in the wrong place.

    • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have an older model of this Spectre. Can confirm it looks fantastic for the price and no smart features .

      I paid $200 for mine. Do not buy the Walmart version. Also this seems overpriced for this unit

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do not buy the Walmart version.

        I’m pretty sure Sceptre is specifically Walmart’s TV brand, much like Insignia is Best Buy’s brand.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s probably what I was confusing them for, actually. I forgot that Onn isn’t just Android TV boxes.

        • guyrocket@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think so. I bought one from Menards years ago.

          Also seeing ScAmazon and Worst Buy selling them online.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ahh, okay, that makes sense then. I’ve only ever seen them at Walmart where I am.

        • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought mine from Amazon, but that was probably 5 years ago. Sceptre has fallen big time since the early 2000’s, but that would be a new low for them.

        • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wtf! I’ve had my 1080p 55 inch dumb as a rock tv for over 7 year, i liberated it from my brother so its older, and was gonna start looking for when finally starts to go. I guess ima need to find someone that knows how to fix it.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve got a slightly older Sceptre 43 inch 4K, and tbh I’ve been trying to find a replacement for a while. The form factor of the TV itself is great, but the picture is pretty crappy. There’s a ton of light bleed around the edges, the HDR functionality is insanely frustrating and looks terrible, and the upscaling is crap. I got it on a ridiculous sale towards the beginning of the pandemic when local shops were clearing their inventories, so I can’t really complain. But I would not buy it again.

      I also have two of their PC monitors, and they have the same problems as the TV. No more Sceptre for me in the future.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does it bother anyone else to pay for all that “smartness” and then figure out how NOT to use it?

    How can consumers fight back against this bullshit?

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You aren’t paying for the smartness. You are actually getting a subsidized TV that should cost a whole lot more but is being sold for cheap since it is also a data collection device.

      Non smart TVs are more expensive than their smart counterparts.

      The only answer is to never give your smart tv access to your network and to use an external device for streaming.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right. What you really need is a tv that reacts less bad to being online. It’s a shame Logitech killed the Harmony because dumbing down your tv successfully generally requires a universal remote.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. All the extra circuitry costs money. Building and maintaining the software costs money. And that’s way more than you’re expected to “earn”.

        As much as it fuels your conspiracy boners, it’s not like Samsung is raking in billions by showing you ads.

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As much as it fuels your conspiracy boners

          If you want to discuss this topic further, I’d be happy to. But not if you’re going to causally throw around insults.

          You don’t know anything about me or my work experience.

          • AAA@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t know anything about me or my work experience.

            Throwing around insults is not helpful, but neither is “trust me bro”.

            • Zastyion345@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just did some searching around and found out that smart tv with the same specs as dum tv is cheeper.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s the neat thing: I don’t need to.

            If you’re just parroting the same narrative without any basis like anybody else and also use the same narratives, I can safely assume that unless proven otherwise, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think that Facebook doesn’t cost money to build or run?

          A crappy years-old ARM-powered smartphone SOC stuck inside a TV costs next to nothing.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It bothers me a LOT!

      Especially when I don’t even use the smart shit, basically use it as a glorified monitor and the thing pops up a message “Our terms and conditions have changed”. I cannot use my fucking TV till I accept the new terms and if I refuse, the TV just turns off.

      It’s such bullshit! I own the TV, how can you change the terms and conditions after the fact? Can I change the terms and conditions? I know I paid $1000 for this TV, but I changed my mind, can you please give me back 250$. I altered the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further.

      Same with my goddamned piece of shit phone. Here is a new software version, it will remove 3 features you love and use every day, drains your battery twice as fast and makes the whole thing slow. You can maybe hack shit till it doesn’t update automatically and only occasionally bugs you about it. But then you don’t get any security updates or compatibility fixes, so that’s not really a good option either. So you buy a new device every 2 years, even though it was perfectly fine.

      I know the EU is working on it, but I can’t wait for the day manufacturers are forced to provide at least 5-7 years of security/compatibility updates for devices, without also bundling feature updates. And be legally bound to the terms and conditions at the moment of sale, no changing the deal after it’s done.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only solace I can offer is that I think most TOS have been deemed unenforceable since literarily no-one reads that shit.

        Somone correct me if I’m wrong please.

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It bothers me it’s so hard to find one that doesn’t include it, but it doesn’t feel like it’s bloating the price to me, if that’s what you mean. Besides the insistence on the smart shit, TV’s have constantly been getting better, bigger, and yet still cheaper.

      It’s unfortunate, but if anything the smart features are part of why they’re staying so cheap. The TV costs the same to make no matter what, but when every company under the sun is paying a fee to have their app baked into the tv, you don’t have to charge the end-user as much to make the same profit. Not to mention the treasure trove of data you can collect(and sell) from the ones who connect it to the internet.

      • This happens everywhere now.

        We had the garage doors replaced, and replaced the openers since they were also a couple decades old and a small part of the total cost. Every damned opener that wasnt bare-bones had smart features. Camera, motion detection, wifi… of course, none of it to any sort of standard, and requiring a special app and account with the vendor. Smart devices are fine - I want smart, to some standard like zwave - but I’ll be god damned if I’m going to make an account with Genie so they can track and sell my garage door use.

        Same thing with the dishwasher. The house being as old as it is, all the devices are hitting planned obsolecense at the same time. All the new dishwashers that have any decent features are smart. Again, with some shitty bespoke app, and requiring an account. This time, I got the damned thing and just haven’t installed the app or configured the wifi on it. Maybe it’s talking to one of the neighbor’s unsecured wifi networks; I guess I can live with that.

        We got lucky on the refrigerator (this time, something inside broke and leaked water into the underfloor for a week before we caught it). We got a model that had everything we wanted and didn’t have wifi.

        I read an article a few months ago about a conference where all these companies are bitching that people are buying these things and not connecting them; with any luck, they’ve been losing money on them and will stop adding smart features to everything. But I’m not holding my breath.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah there’s this idea that we all want high tech, high surveillance everything. Fuck that, I want stuff that works right without accounts, or can work on a home hub or something like that. I hate feeling expected to load my phone with an app for everything I interact with

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I already have >500 accounts spread across various shops, game dev accounts (because every publisher needs its own launcher), services, etc.
          Too much data floating around the world because just another joe needed to seel some more data >_>

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of the “features” are profit motivated. Lots of companies love to be paid for bundling software on the device.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s mostly because it’s all heavily integrated. The chipset that drives the smart platform also drives everything else, including the inputs and stuff.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the answer every time this question comes up. You pay more because it doesn’t generate revenue by spying on you, but it doesn’t have all the bullshit cause it’s meant to be on during all biz hours showing store promos and the like.

  • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you connect your device to a compatible hdmi port and turn on the device first, it should turn on your tv to that input straight away. Boot times should be nearly instant unless you do a full restart of the smart tv.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I got a Vizio 4K and refused to give it my wifi access. it boots in maybe 5 seconds and the only issue is the time displayed on screen is way off. otherwise fully functional with no smartness. and it restarts using the same input as when it was last used.

    • RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did the same thing with Vizio and it eventually would randomly turn off, or sound wouldn’t work or something, you’d call support and they’d tell you that you have to update it. It doesn’t make any sense, but I did it and it would work find for awhile again. Thr tinfoil hat in me says they do that to get whatever info they have stored on you.

      • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My 6 yr old Visio is starting that general fuckery too. I have to unplug for a minute to get it going.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Track the DNS requests and if anything calls for telemetry.brand.com block it.
        If they arent as evil as youtube and use separate subdomains for thr respective service you should be able to allow the update domain but block all others.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A few months ago, I connected my Vizio to my network to do firmware updates to see if it could be any better since it was 3 years old and I was sure there were improvements. Then and only then did I start seeing random crashes and the TV speakers turning on and up to max volume (I have a sound bar + subwoofer). The TV shut off without warning in the middle of a Rocket League tournament and wouldn’t turn back on until I unplugged it and plugged it back in. That was the last straw. Disabled the Wi-Fi connection and it’s been running fine ever since.

  • Tony! Toni! Toné! ☑️@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have found some. The key is to look for either outdoor televisions or ones designed for commercial use, such as those used for restaurant menus at the counter.

  • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My Samsung boots fast, goes straight to whatever input I left it on, and doesn’t have smart functions because I don’t have it on the network and never accepted the license for them. I update the software occasionally and then disconnect it again.

    It’s older though. I’d try and see if you can play with one somewhere and if they’ll let you reset it to factory.

  • willworkforicecream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I need to get non-smart TVs for work and usually end up buying Sceptre TVs. They do everything you’re asking, but I don’t live with them day-to-day so I’m not sure what they’re like in that regard.

  • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Almost every smart TV I have played with you can set them up to just go to an HDMI input and turn off any “home” menus screens. You also can usually skip any Network setup.

    I have played with LG, Vizio, Samsung and Sony TVs all have had options to do this. (But this has been over the last 1-7 years).

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My vizio also starts on the last input. So it only goes to the smart TV stuff when I want it too. It’s older (E50x or something like that) but it’s been getting updates so I’m assuming it’s the same on newer ones still.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If there are none, does anybody know a tv that boots fast(less than 30 seconds) and displays an hdmi input by default without the need to choose the input from a menu.

    I have a Phillips 4k “smart tv” I keep in “dumb” mode at all times. https://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/65PFL5766_F7/5700-series-4k-ultrahd-led-android-tv-with-google-assistant

    Just never ever connect it to the internet, and keep it on HDMI 1.

    The TV is even smart enough to detect when there is a live signal on HDMI 1 and it turns itself on automatically. This might be a feature of my stereo having an ARC out HDMI line.

    I have all my game consoles, google chromecast, etc etc connected to my stereo, then stereo out connected to the TV’s HDMI 1. When I turn anything on it “just works”. No menus, no inputs, it just flips on and displays HDMI 1 and keeps its mouth shut lol

  • Stellar_Stein@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Look for a commercial grade television set. For example, on Best Buy, search for ‘Television’ click the ‘Non Smart’ option and you will get 38 choices to peruse. BTW, commercial grade is more durable with a longer warranty. Good luck!

  • CCatMan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The latest tvs the boot pretty fast, when you turn them on for the first time just don’t agree to the policies and it’ll be a dumb tv.

    The other option is a computer monitor.

    My Sony TV allows for a default input on boot. Wish it allowed a default App on boot…