The bot demonstrated very well what this article is about. I don’t know the internals, but I also can’t image the bot was using the best and most expensive ways of doing analysis.

It was pretty bad at “getting the point” even when it was obvious, a better system should be able to do so. Sometimes the point is more difficult to discern and there has to be some judgement, you can see this in comments sometimes where people discuss what “the point” was and not just the data. I imagine an AI would have some difficulty determining what is worth summarizing in these situations especially.

Different applications have better performance on one vs other. Google Cloud still offers a lot of Nvidia options.

You mean when he said he had nothing against gender-neutral language but rather drive-by PRs and made the change?

Making a donation to a campaign that the majority of Californians voted for is unforgivable.

HTML used to be a pretty set standard, maintained by the W3C. HTML5 was retired in 2018 (5.2 in 2021). Now it is a Living Standard that changes often and is maintained by a consortium of browser vendors.

It is also not the only technology being changed.

That is an apt description for Lunduke.

Normal based on what? The ads exist because plenty of normal people use them to decide where to buy things or certain items. If they didn’t bring people in the stores wouldn’t bother.

Making a low effort argument against a straw man that was never stated. You sure you aren’t a conservative?

No, I disagree with the idea of digging into years of history to drag up the one thing to be mad at and bandwagon over with a loud mob with surface level care that move onto the next bandwagon in a week. Typical to Twitter behavior. Doesn’t actually help anyone, typically hurts the movements they claim to support among everyone else.

I’m about the farthest from Lunduke you can get, he’s just not wrong in this specific instance. You don’t know me, “you sure do sound” is a silly attempt at internet games. Yawn.

Years later is ridiculous and unwarranted, it’s looking for someone to attack.

Removed by mod

Do you regularly use their ads to compare prices and select what to buy at each one, or generally stick to one place with a few trips to another one?

I think you explained it fine, it just doesn’t make sense to people who only go to the same place.

Difficult to fix if exploited.

Can be patched beforehand.

Because people learn how to write as young children in a place that typically has no experience with a proper technique for left-handed people, and re-learning how to write is not as easy as thinking to yourself that a different way would be better.

It’s probably good you don’t say the “you know” because that would be dumb as fuck.

Mozilla org isn’t the concern. Mozilla Corp, the for profit company, makes Firefox and has to worry about things like revenue for the most part. Mozilla org used to develop it and could fold it back in if it went really bad, it would definitely hamper development but being the premier browser is more of a Corp goal than an org one. Most likely the corp will just find a different search partner again (Google hasn’t always been default).

Yes it does, regularly. Don’t know what that person is talking about acting like it somehow wouldn’t.

They update Cinnamon regularly, and the main release is updated when Debian has a new stable release. This makes sense, since it’s based on Debian instead of Ubuntu. LMDE 6 is less than a year old.

Nah it was specifically related to their usage of BPF with the Red Hat kernel, since fixed by Red Hat. Symptom was, you update your system and then it panics. Still usable if you selected a previous kernel at boot though.

It was panicking RHEL 9.4 boxes a month ago.

This specific issue is different than the other specific issue, correct.

The point is, “this could only happen on windows” is wrong.

It was affecting RHEL 9.4 users within the last two months.