On paper, the recent EU-China auto deal looks like a compromise Europe needed. In reality, it is a big mistake: short-term relief for European automakers versus long-term market dominance for China.
The EU protects the hybride car market in Europe in essence protecting the ‘old’ combustible engine technology at the same not incentivizing EU car makers to go all in on Electrical Vehicles.
The future however is 100% electric, and this is where the EU car makers will lose out as they remain stuck in their old ways.
This deal shows the pressure the EU is under to get short-term relief, while at the same time not thinking about the long-term consequences.
In essence they EU has no China strategy
Is God going to put more oil in the ground for you? Utterly inane, your derangement syndrome has removed all your analytical ability. The fear amd stress you live under must be incredible to feed such superstition.
Wow. All the bots singing from the same hymn sheet. What a surprise
Anyone who doesn’t agree with me is a bot. If people collectively disagree with my takes that have no basis in reality, it means they’re a bot hivemind.
22 botvotes 667744
It’s called scientific socialism for a reason. We come to the same conclusions about you because we have mountains of evidence to draw from regarding what is going on in that empty little head of yours that you gleefully offer up as a vessel for regurgitating CIA propaganda and racist tropes about the asiatic red menace.
You’re operating on like 70 year old McCarthyite tropes and propaganda its that fuckin obvious.
Just go back to reddit. It’s where you dipshit fascists belong.
Actually, fascists belong in
Why fo you keep saying racism
I didn’t even say racism in that reply, I just pointed out what was implicitly racist about your mindset and you know that because you picked up that I was calling you racist without using the word racist. Deep down you know that you’re just a xenophobic piece of shit loser.
Abuse. Reported.
The fun thing about calling someone a bot is that the accusation can be made without evidence and is impossible to disprove. It’s a tailor-made excuse to immediately dismiss anyone’s argument without an attempt to address it.
18 botvotes.
What if there’s an oil black out? Your argument makes no sense. Oil and fossils fuels are VASTLY more precarious than renewable energy and take more steps to provide the energy. I just want to add to the chorus of bots to show the advanced might of the Proletarian Bot Army.
Their mind is just BBC talking points bouncing around like rocks in a washing machine
Whats an oil blackout
Just adapting your words, it’s not a phrase, it would be an oil shortage. Oil or other fuel shortages are just as possible or more likely than a blackout from 100% non-fossil fuel energy sources. Like stopping the flow of oil from the Strait of Hormuz, if no one used oil or we used only a small amount the resource couldn’t be restricted as it can be now. If all power was wind, solar, hydroelectic, etc, a nation across the world would have less ability to hamper your energy. You can have a diverse power grid without fossil fuels.
Interesting how quickly the b*ts reply
god you truly have nothing to say
bots bots bots
bots bots bots
bots bots bots
Ty for agreeing
Got any spare soros bucks? Im all out of Xi bucks.
What is soros buck lol. Here goes the anti semitism from the bots
guess we’re not yandex web crawlers after all
K