“its a specific strain” ah yes there is no strain of extremely sex negative patriarchal people under capitalism, they simply dont exist? lol? this is such a nothing statement
and famously women dont get horny or get off or play horny video games?
people dont apply “goon” to romantasy stuff because they like romantasy and can pretend its a completely different thing. famously reactionaries are extremely consistent with their beliefs and how they apply them,
you can jump through as many hoops as you want to say “no no im not a puritan this is bog standard reactionary slop not a super special strain of reactionary slop” but that doesnt change the fact you sound the exact same as the person that calls a woman in a bikini “goon bait” and call people who look at pornography “dgenerates”
or complaining about “unnecessary sex scenes” in movies because you are incapable of wrapping your head around sex not being an inherently lesser act, or that it could have any meaning outside of “make babies”
its the same exact bullshit used to oppress people for literal centuries just with a fresh coat of paint expunged by the exact same type of people
They mostly don’t no, they’re a tiny, tiny minority of consumerist society, but you especially attributing any current forms of sex negativity to puritanism is fallacious. Try talking about porn games in literally any country and see what happens.
“Damn, the puritans have infected China and Iran as well! Their reach has no bounds”
Edit: do not try to “out-woke” me, I played The Joy Of Sex on the Philips CD-i alone two nights ago. You cannot “sex-negative” me.
this is some “well um akshually the trump administration isnt fascist because its not literally part of the mid 1900s italian political party” levels of cope
thank you oh wise man for mansplaining to me how incredibly wrong i am because you cant accept that in almost 500 years you havent managed to come up with anything more original than the same talking points that the average 1600s christian espoused
“its a specific strain” ah yes there is no strain of extremely sex negative patriarchal people under capitalism, they simply dont exist? lol? this is such a nothing statement
and famously women dont get horny or get off or play horny video games?
people dont apply “goon” to romantasy stuff because they like romantasy and can pretend its a completely different thing. famously reactionaries are extremely consistent with their beliefs and how they apply them,
you can jump through as many hoops as you want to say “no no im not a puritan this is bog standard reactionary slop not a super special strain of reactionary slop” but that doesnt change the fact you sound the exact same as the person that calls a woman in a bikini “goon bait” and call people who look at pornography “dgenerates”
or complaining about “unnecessary sex scenes” in movies because you are incapable of wrapping your head around sex not being an inherently lesser act, or that it could have any meaning outside of “make babies”
its the same exact bullshit used to oppress people for literal centuries just with a fresh coat of paint expunged by the exact same type of people
They mostly don’t no, they’re a tiny, tiny minority of consumerist society, but you especially attributing any current forms of sex negativity to puritanism is fallacious. Try talking about porn games in literally any country and see what happens.
“Damn, the puritans have infected China and Iran as well! Their reach has no bounds”
Edit: do not try to “out-woke” me, I played The Joy Of Sex on the Philips CD-i alone two nights ago. You cannot “sex-negative” me.
this is some “well um akshually the trump administration isnt fascist because its not literally part of the mid 1900s italian political party” levels of cope
thank you oh wise man for mansplaining to me how incredibly wrong i am because you cant accept that in almost 500 years you havent managed to come up with anything more original than the same talking points that the average 1600s christian espoused