Enjoyer_of_Games [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 days agoSpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a monthwww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1101arrow-down1external-linkSpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a monthwww.businessinsider.comEnjoyer_of_Games [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square21linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareBelly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·16 days ago Some of the engines didn’t start triggering an automatic launch abort Very cool a private $1 trillion company can’t do basics public sector space programs were doing back in the 1960s.
minus-squareOphrys@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·16 days agoNo you don’t understand! It’s called iterative design, It’s supposed to fail every time!
minus-squareFossifoo [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·15 days agoAcktually these are full flow combustion. The only other nation to get those running (in the 60s) was the USSR.
Very cool a private $1 trillion company can’t do basics public sector space programs were doing back in the 1960s.
No you don’t understand! It’s called iterative design, It’s supposed to fail every time!
Acktually these are full flow combustion. The only other nation to get those running (in the 60s) was the USSR.