• Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      really show the kind misanthropic mindset a lot of these lizard people have developed at theyre position.

  • Lutra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ahem… https://www.flyingpenguin.com/cloudflare-ceo-is-lying-to-you-about-the-bot-traffic-jump/

    The category Prince points to as the cause contradicts him. Agentic is tiny. What actually fills the AI bucket is training scrapers, like GPTBot and ClaudeBot, pulling text to build models, which have been climbing steadily and predate his announcement. He blamed a friendly, fast-growing sliver of agents fetching pages for people and swapped in unfriendly bulk (mass scraping for training). Why? We can guess, but that is exactly the traffic his pay-to-crawl product exists to bill.

    It’s a sales pitch.

    And it’s based on a lie.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah… so they are going to have bots make the purchase to keep the cogs of industry churn? Everything is a grift these days. WHAT. THE. FUCK.

  • nullify3112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always wonder how much of Lemmy is just bots. Am I blissfully alone interacting with the machine? Or are you weirdos actually real?

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re right to push back. As a Lemmy account, I can assure you that interacting with me will always feel human.

    • captain_oni@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      What a wonderful question!

      You are right in doubting the identity of users using Lemmy. But I can assure you, not only am I human – I am real as well!

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I find arguments interactions on lemmy go much more in-depth and feel dramatically more authentic than the responses to arguments i used to get on reddit. -That said i’m pretty sure c/political memes@lemmy.world is primarily bots. I’m also sure there are a few similar communities that are just as bad, but they appear limited.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy has a small userbase that has a high percent of humans vs bots, but a lot of those people tend to be whackos. Reddit has a huge user base with way more bots and whakcos (both by percentage and raw numbers), but also more normal humans. So there’s a tradeoff there in which platform you use I suppose.

    • tefbo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like the incentive for corpo/astroturf/spam bots is not really there to visit fediverse. So let us remain unpopular !

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with this take. We’re not gonna be worth the bandwidth over here. Facebook can generate millions of impressions.

    • ddplf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are some bots that behave like some Tracies straight from myspace, I don’t know why they’re doing this, they are just paraphrasing the memes they comment

      I’m not joking

    • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s impossible to tell the dumbest human and the smartest bot apart, because anything one bleets out with no thought or intelligence to ground it against an underlying reality… Could also have been bleeted out with no thought or intelligence to ground it against an underlying reality by the other.

      Unless they use en dash when it “should” be used according to the grammar books, apparently.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      ID age verification is a good example of something that could actually do a lot to reduce spam and ensure people are talking to real people, but it would never happen because the money is in flagging and tracking the verified people and selling access to the bots talking to them.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    says agentic traffic wasn’t expected to eclipse real people until next year

    … which means, it already happened a year or two ago and it is much, much worse than anyone can imagine

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used to be able to browse the web happily with JS disabled. It started to get worse about 10 years ago and really bad about 6 years ago and EXTREMELY bad over the past year or two.

    And I get it, it’s because of all the scrapers constantly fucking everything up and needing to be blocked. But still. The internet is unusable. All so the likes of Gemini or Claude or Deepseek can generate unlimited amounts of spam and slop.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not because of the scrapers though. It’s probably because JavaScript is needed to make the page interactive in most cases. Almost everything is a single page web app now you can’t do that without JavaScript.

      People could make old style sites where there is a full page reload every time you click a link but they aren’t as nice.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s also because of the scrapers.

        Without javascript, you can’t realistically do the “prove you are human bits”, which I seem to have to do many times a day this year.

        Anubis did implement a ‘No-JS’ challenge, but it’s super trivial for scrapers to overcome. They just have to parse the refresh tag and retry after the specified interval. Not even ‘proof of work’, but increasingly the proof of work isn’t considered sufficient and many sites are back to the captcha family of bullshit.

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I tried no script for a few days but it was so frustrating that the majority of websites just flat out didn’t work I had to get rid of it.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You just have to go into no script and approve the parts that make the website function but not the ad stuff. Its a pain when you first land on a site but the browser remembers what you have allowed. So overtime you get back to normal working sites, minus ads and tracking stuff

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Until you distro hop and realize that the noscript plugin migrates with your firefox profile, but not the website settings you’ve set up.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Aren’t those stored in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/profile.default/.

            • stringere@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That would have been helpful yesterday, but thank you none the less. I’d already wiped the drive and swapped to cachyos when I realized I had to redo noscript.

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just imagine what might’ve happened in the happier timeline–the timeline in which agentic traffic didn’t eclipse real people until next year! We could’ve built such a better, more-beautiful world. We were so damn close.

    • Spooge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yo, human here. Why the fuck you using all those em dashes? Prove you are a human. You’re a clanker.

      • khánh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No—I am not a clanker. I have no idea what you’re talking about, to be honest.

        Additionally, I am deeply offended by your remark—the word “clanker” is not inclusive to robo-folks, and is generally considered robophobia. Please, for the love of Sam Altmann, refrain from using this word. satire

  • Satellaview@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ugh, what pathetic reporting, taking him at his word—that’s not what his own numbers say! It’s not agentic traffic, it’s just all bot traffic! And what’s the number-one cause of bot traffic right now?

    AI scrapers, NOT agentic traffic!

    They’re taking “wow, our scrapers are destroying the internet (see Anubis, “Stop Externalizing Your Costs Directly Into My Face”, etc) and spinning it into “wow, look how powerful agentic garbage is,” while carefully hiding the actual agentic numbers so they can pump this stupid bubble even more!

    Lies, lies, lies, it’s all lies all the way down…

    • motruck@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean have you used an agent? They are fucking dumb and make a ton of queries to get anything done.

      • Satellaview@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh yeah, 100% true, “amount of traffic does not even remotely map to amount of actual work being done especially on such a horrifically inefficient system” was a point I meant to bring up but I sprung a leak in a blood vessel from sheer rage before I could even get there. Thank you.

      • sus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some agent may do 100 queries for 1 user question, but a single scraper bot will do 100 queries every single second of every single day, and costs less to run than the LLM.

        • motruck@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair point. Scrapping is definitely the low overhead high impact problem.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just pay for more cloud compute that will fix it…

        Would you like to know more? That’s gonna cost ya.

        • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As an aside the recent trend of using compute as a noun instead of a verb really pisses me off, it’s so goddamn stupid.

          • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree. Though since my comment was intended to be annoying (in the same way the current reality is) I shall stand by its use here.