• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The fascist dictator at the helm remotely bricking customers $100k private vehicles will surely improve the brands image and sales performance!

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t really care if this is real or not, or if the song sucks, or if it’s a banger, or if it never existed.

    None of that is what’s concerning.

    The concerning thing for me is that, even if it’s fake, everyone just kinda accepting that Tesla can, and would, remotely deactivate a vehicle, when it may be in motion, and may be in a dangerous or otherwise hazardous location where losing control could mean that people die…

    And everyone is just like “that’s totally something they would do! Lol”… What?

    I could give a fuck less if they deactivate his… Idk, heated seat subscription, or autopilot, or (insert stupid feature here). But making it so the vehicle can’t drive? For a car you paid money to “own”?

    What the actual fuck everyone?

    Boycott. That’s all that I can say. … Not that I wasn’t already planning on doing that…

    • dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Google it and you’ll see tons of websites telling this was faked.

      E.g. that it’s highly illegal to stop a car on the road, contradictory information on tesla display (failed update and cease and desist, don’t go together. Also return to dealer while being disabled?), addressed name in letter is not the real name, hyphen in wrong place, etc. And tesla (obviously) claimed it’s false.

      I’m not saying this is proof but saying there are a lot of red flags. Any update from him? Not that I could find. A stunt perhaps to gain publicity?

  • thegr8goldfish@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Totally reasonable. I wish every electronic device would brick itself if it heard you talking shit about it. People are too rude to toasters.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m sure he’s REAL motivated to clean up his dis track in order to use a vehicle that was bad enough to warrant a dis track.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not going to listen to it but apparently it isn’t a dis track, it is a load of wank about how rich he is that he can afford a Cybertruck.

      Apparently the author also declined to listen to it, but they are a Journalist; it is their job to listen to it.

      • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is vital context. They didn’t disable his truck because he talked trash about it. He loves his Cybertruck. They disabled it because he’s black and dances around like a black person while he’s talking about it, and that means he’s not welcome at the party. If he was Tim Pool making a song about how much he loves his Cybertruck they’d have invited him to the next event to put it on stage.