• Tacitblue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    it’s funny, we know what you’re talking about. We can’t say what your talking about as that may involve a meeting with the SS if you are american.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s nice to see that the “in minecraft” meme has evolved to not even mentioning what to do at all, that we all just know fairly well anyway.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Rather than a front page obit wouldn’t it be great if Congress and Senate just did their job and legally removed him.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I concur. The fact that his death seems like the only way we will be rid of him is a bigger problem than trump.

      What about the next person who does all this. Like Vance ?

      • Lutoures@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Vance does not have the cult leader credentials. If he pulled a “Let’s take Greenland” out of his ass, he wouldn’t have the same spell to keep 30% of approval.

        That’s why many authoritarian regimes fall after the death of the charismatic leader.

        And yes, the root cause of Trump appearing in the political scene go beyond himself and point towards structural problems of US society. But now he has this power, it’s a fact that his death will cause a great loss to the political power of the MAGA movement, and it’ll be very hard for any successor to keep this coalition in power, specially considering they’re already fighting among themselves.

        • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Congress was envisioned to jealousy guard their own power. They have been eager to abdicate their power and responsibility to the Executive to avoid political fallout (so that they can stay in office capitalizing off the position) for decades before Trump was on the scene.

          The Supreme Court has absolutely no legal oversight, and even publication of their corruption has not moved them to impose any code of ethics on themselves.

          The two parties both conspire to deliver us to the same monied interests, just with different flavors of icing on top.

          Trump is the culmination of the rot in the system, he is not the source of it. There is no realistic way for the system to go on, even if Trump keels over tomorrow. Regardless of if Vance can command the cult when Trump dies, the system must be greatly reformed/ overhauled.

  • salacious_coaster@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I thought for sure that if nothing else, the CIA would have done it. He got a ton of them killed for no reason last time. Seems like it would have been simple self-preservation.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That kind of situation is a nice demonstration that economic theories which rely on people acting logically (Smith, Marx, etc.) are not true. People are mostly driven by intangible factors like ideology, loyalty, and complacency.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I agree.

    The front page of every newspaper in the country has never so desperately needed an obituary on it.

    Now I know what you might be thinking: never? What about that one time in the 1940s? Not even then, because even if that fucker LIVED he was on the cusp of capture. He was no longer a threat even before his obituary showed up

    This time I have no faith or hope that the threat may actually be nullified at all otherwise.

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To anyone reading this: Russian, Chinese, (even American) bots and agitators are astroturfing all over social media to get America to spin out into more violence. It’s been well documented for almost a decade now. Please think about “who” (or what) is posting all these calls to violence.

    Defending oneself from being attacked is different than actively committing violence unprovoked. Please just think about this. Having said all that, every American should still arm themselves and know how to use it.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If there’s no legal method to oppose all the unlawful shit the administration is doing violence is all that’s left. Democrats need to get off their asses and start doing something or shit is going to hit the fan. It’s not like any of Trump’s goons have a problem being violent or killing people.

      • zd9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s a lot of grey area there. I mean you personally or close family/friends being in illegal imminent danger of bodily harm, not just generally something you saw on social media that made you mad.

        • colin@lemmy.uninsane.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean you personally or close family/friends being in illegal imminent danger of bodily harm, not just generally something you saw on social media that made you mad.

          if social media oversamples for the number of people in imminent danger, what’s your method to avoid undersampling? because outside of those who would trust you with their life and call on you to protect them, the people around you who fall into this category aren’t going to just casually mention “i’m in danger from the state” for what I really hope should be obvious reasons.

          • zd9@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            To avoid undersampling, look at what’s happening in your local community. Be aware of shit going down, support those who need food, shelter, protection. And in cases where necessary (there’s a huge decision making process at this point), use defensive force when legally able.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well the rest of the world wanted the us population to learn from the 2016-2020 idiots first term, but instead they said “Fuck you, cunts. Lol” and then the majority of them either voted for that thing, or enabled it by not voting or protest voting. So that option is off the table.

      Trying to appease the orange paedo does fuck all because he’s basically a schoolyard bully. Give him an inch and he’ll then rape your daughter then blame you for doing it. So the appeasement option is off the table.

      There’s absolutely no chance any fucker over there has the spine to bring him to justice. So that option is off the table.

      The fact is the obese imbecile is so demented and broken that nothing will work.
      When something is broken you either fix it, which is impossible. Or get rid of it…which is where we are now.

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Defending oneself from being attacked is different than actively committing violence unprovoked.

      You don’t consider the provocation to be real? What part of being shot in the face could be misinterpreted?

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Legal doesn’t matter when the secret service starts harassing people for saying things like “Trump should go to trial,” it’ll have the chilling effect it’s supposed to unless people fight back by saying things like “it’s not illegal to wish the President of the United States were dead.”

  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s NOT illegal to form an alternative government of the United States as a micronation with a distinct name, flag, anthem and coat of arms and such (and you can still pay taxes to the current US government and call that “aid”). Forming a micronation is NOT the same as being a sovereign citizen.

    • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem is that you can’t form a micronation out of land that belongs to a nation already, unless that nation cedes it to you. Until that point, you are still subject to the laws of wherever you are.