What are the options here? Can I have them be only visible when printing? Does it mirror itself if I print double-sided? Maybe pdf does not support these things, but to me these are the important questions.

tell me how can I feel pain

how can I feel pain

when you’re being so supportive

• Bill Bailey

Wait, this is just a post here on lemmy, not a reply in the issue thread? Or am I just not finding it? You should probably have this discussion in the github issue too.

What you are saying fits the american “liberal” label. What you are describing I would call social democrat, not a liberal. People calling themselves liberal in europe are, examples from sweden: compares public insight into publicly funded privatly owned companies to soviet, are for privatization of welfare institutions, collaborates with the far right, calls rightwing newspapers communist, and are against free speech at universities.

To be fair though, the meme is probably targeting socdems anyway so I guess fair enough.

“Some” appears to be 3. How many are left?

At least for sweden they appear to have shipping options with taxes/duty included. I don’t have in front of me right now, but it was something like 200€ all inclusive shipping on a 500€ order. Something like that.

Sure, but their’s is not flat

individuals earning below a set threshold receive payments instead of paying taxes

So it is not universal. It is not UBI. The difference it not billionaires but the middle class. The upper middle class may not need a UBI, but if you give it to them, they would be inclined to vote to keep it. If you only give a non-universal/progressive negative-tax/income, the middle class would be inclined to vote to vote to keep UBI way below “basic”. Like tax breaks offered to the middle class, I hate them, but they are basically impossible to reverse because they are so popular. A UBI and whatever you want to call this is very different policies.

But they are not for a UBI, right? Because I think they want a negative tax, not something that is a universal income.

Wikipedia says center/center-left. But I’ve met a Volt member, and they were very neo-liberal.

Only if you also call length “1-dimensional volume”.

You’d just continue saying ‘volume’, alternatively ‘k-dimensional volume’ or ‘volume of the n-dimensional object’. Like for spheres: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_of_an_n-ball

The n-dimensional volume of a Euclidean ball of radius R in n-dimensional Euclidean space is:[1]

It is called Einstein’s Equation, it is a General Relativity equation describing the spacetime geometry (G) relation to various energy/mass configurations (T) and the cosmological constant (Lambda).

Until the day of the defence…

Analysts using Julia and Mathematica are confused by this meme.

If you like mathbf more then at least redefine vec and use vec. Keeps the code more tidy.

I’m running PopOS on a computer for wathing media at home. I’m not too impressed. I read a bunch of comment threads recommening it so I treid it out. They seem a bit unstable – that at least falls in OP middle ground. I made an update and dpms management was just different, like the screen is no longer turning itself off. I’ve had some thing like this happen on it. It’s not breakage, it’s a bit annoying. “Just works”? Eh, sure, kinda’.

Burn After Reading https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0887883/

Saw a guy in italy almost ram a cop car atan intersection. I think the driver was running a red light, but could have been the cop running a red. Anyhow, the driver breaks just before the cop car, and the cop on the passanger side just gesticulates his discontent but they just keep rolling on anyway. They could not be bothered.

In Sweden a TV news station exposed a troll farm run by the far right party. I’d say that counts.

Between negative infinity and infinity

x is a member in the set of x:es where x is on the real line Nope, it is: x is a member of the set consisting of x itself and the real line.

The set of x:es where x is on the real line and the absolute value of x is greater or equal to zero

This one makes no sense… x is a member of the set cosisting the union of: the set of m/n where m and n belong to the integers, n being nonzero; the set x; and the empty set.

Last one makes no sense since x appear to be a set and a rational number at the same time. Implied by the meme it also supposed to be equivalent to the real line, which it is not.