silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前Zero ships from China are bound for California’s top ports. Officials haven’t seen that since the pandemicwww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down11
arrow-up1363arrow-down1external-linkZero ships from China are bound for California’s top ports. Officials haven’t seen that since the pandemicwww.cnn.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square47linkfedilink
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down2·5 个月前At least he has reduced the enormous amounts of pollution created by all those ships normally? I don’t know, I’m just trying to find a sliver of hope somewhere.
minus-squaredangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down2·5 个月前Container ships are the most economical and least polluting way to ship goods per ton
minus-squareMithre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 个月前I thought trains were the most efficient way to ship goods, though I’ll concede that trains are notoriously bad at crossing oceans.
minus-squareSinningStromgald@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 个月前Wikipedia entry claims shipping is the most environmentally efficient transport method.
minus-squarehemmes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 个月前Don’t worry, Trump’s got you covered…
minus-squarePrehensile_cloaca @lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前Especially if wind power becomes a viable alternative (again?) https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/new-wind-powered-cargo-ship-sets-sail-2023-08-22_en
minus-squareNatakuNox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·5 个月前Doesn’t mean it’s still okay for the environment. Those ships need to be transitioned to nuclear.
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down8·5 个月前So you are saying container ships do not cause massive pollution?
minus-squarejustgohomealready@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·5 个月前No, they are saying that any other way to transport those goods would cause more pollution.
minus-squareDominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·5 个月前So you are saying that by NOT transporting these goods whatsoever, the environment is harmed more?
minus-squarejustgohomealready@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前You need to learn how to read.
At least he has reduced the enormous amounts of pollution created by all those ships normally?
I don’t know, I’m just trying to find a sliver of hope somewhere.
Container ships are the most economical and least polluting way to ship goods per ton
I thought trains were the most efficient way to ship goods, though I’ll concede that trains are notoriously bad at crossing oceans.
Wikipedia entry claims shipping is the most environmentally efficient transport method.
Don’t worry, Trump’s got you covered…
Especially if wind power becomes a viable alternative (again?)
https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/new-wind-powered-cargo-ship-sets-sail-2023-08-22_en
Doesn’t mean it’s still okay for the environment. Those ships need to be transitioned to nuclear.
So you are saying container ships do not cause massive pollution?
No, they are saying that any other way to transport those goods would cause more pollution.
So you are saying that by NOT transporting these goods whatsoever, the environment is harmed more?
You need to learn how to read.