• Onions Sliced Thin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Authenticated cheese is the answer to the question, “what is the blockchain really good for, other than laundering money?”

  • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    this honestly doesn’t sound too bad (as long as the chips aren’t toxic)

    using blockchains to track the movement of goods, like from ports or for cheese, is probably their only non-BS use case other than volatile currencies

    the reason a Blockchain would be preferable to a traditional database is bc its effectively impossible to change the records on it

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s ironic that the design of blockchain is to be impossible to edit as security against fraud. Because crypto is famous for all the fraud, And the block-chain’s nature makes the fraud permanent and fixed.

      At least one of the currencies had to fork because fraudulent transactions couldn’t be undone.

      • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        impossible to edit as security against fraud.

        Well security against monetary fraud, like faking coins or double spending. Especially double spending, at the time when bitcoin started pretty much all the other mathematical problems were figured out except that one.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      using blockchains to track the movement of goods, like from ports or for cheese, is probably their only non-BS use case other than volatile currencies

      We already do this with barcodes and QR codes, which you can just make with a printer.

      • usrtrv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No? Barcodes and QR codes do not have enough information for unique identification. (Well they could but they start getting bigger and bigger)

        But the real issue is needing these codes tracked and audited in a public manner. Instead of having a third party company trusted with all the cheese, you use a Blockchain with a public ledger. This doesn’t even require much processing power since there’s no incentive to mine as many blocks as possible.

        I hate cryptobros but logistics is a good use for the tech. Tech is tech, not all use cases are bad.

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        QR codes are just symbols in a camera readible way and barcodes numbers in a camara readible way.
        A storage medium for 0´s & 1´s like a USB stick or a disc but way less storage.

        They dont add any security, heck when you would have looked at barcodes you would likely have realised that the same product uses the same code (and not each one being unique)

        Their use cases are cashiers dont have to manually find/type each product into their terminal but have a scanable ID & QR Codes are mostly to open websites as users without having to type a potentionally long URL.
        In booth cases they remove the human error.