The chickens weren’t doing the coke. I think.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    16 days ago

    According to the owner, the chickens were there (and I quote) “For eat”, which I just love. Considering the drugs, the drug sales ledger and the ammo - probably it’s cock fighting, yeah?

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Well who knows, maybe they were part of an elaborate airline miles fraud scheme like in that one Always Sunny episode

    • amzd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      I don’t get how there is outrage about chickens fighting when basically all bars serve dead chickens?

      • solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Not sure if you’re serious but I’ll answer in case…

        The problem with cock fighting is the vicious animal cruelty. Even in places where it’s fully legal and socially accepted they do nasty stuff like attach a blade to the leg so that when the birds attack each other it slices the opponent and ends the fight faster.

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think you’re underestimating the cruelty of industrial poultry farming.

        • amzd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          I am serious. I know that it is extremely cruel and I agree with you. I just think it’s weird that people are only selectively outraged with this and not with the animal cruelty that happens to the chickens that are for eating.

          For example if I had to choose between being a male chick born in the egg industry or in the cock fighting business I would probably choose the fighting since I would rather fight for my life than be put in a blender alive? Maybe that’s not a common opinion and people think that’s more humane than fighting.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            People need to eat, they don’t need cruel entertainment. And no, eating meat isn’t the same as entertainment from watching animals fight.

            • amzd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 days ago

              They don’t need to eat meat (according to all major dietician organizations). Since it is not out of necessity, it is for pleasure, same as watching animals fight.

          • Lumisal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            Not all countries do that btw.

            Also, if we’re really comparing, I don’t think you’d have much thought on choices at 1 week old, considering you wouldn’t even have self awareness.

            • amzd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              Which countries don’t do this?

              Human babies also don’t have self awareness. I don’t think that’s a trait that justifies killing someone.

          • solomon42069@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Fair enough man. I definitely don’t want any chickens or eggs from the Matrix style battery farms either! I have a feeling that you can taste the despair.

                  • solomon42069@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 days ago

                    Dude I think it’s a bit disingenuous to compare culling to battery farms.

                    If we wanted to be 100% totally cruelty free we’d stop eating meat and stop industrialising the deaths of other species, but hey I’m also a meat eater and accept my sin there. I think by it’s very premise the meat industry is never going to be completely without cruelty, but I’d at least like the animals to have a happy dignified life before it’s ended for us to eat.

                    Culling (I presume and hope as humanely as possible) is one of those realities of farming food. It’s my understanding that even if you don’t eat meat, consuming produce from most farms will mean that your product like resulted in the deaths of various creatures known as “pests”.

                    I hope to one day own my own plot in the country and have my own chickens, whom I will take very good care of for the awesome supply of free eggs they give me and my family. Until then I’ll try to just shop as responsibly as possible.

                    P.S. The site you linked doesn’t have SSL… but generally in Australia we trust the local animal rights groups RSPCA to tell us what’s up and what’s safe. i.e. https://rspcaapproved.org.au/product/eggs/

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yeah I think that’s a fair point. I feel like meat eaters often use the utility of the carcass to justify the death - “They use every part of the chicken, nothing goes to waste”.

        A lot of people do seem to think eating it is a more justifiable death then gambling on the life then disposing of the carcass, but maybe a beakless immobile battery hen would disagree.

        • amzd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          The “nothing goes to waste” argument just ignores the victims life though. They did not want to die.

          Also seems like a pretty easy solution then to just eat the killed bird and bing bang bosh: cock fighting is morally justified.

          • essell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 days ago

            i Look at it this way. All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can’t be immoral.

            Causing suffering to the living certainly can be.

            • amzd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can’t be immoral.

              Yeah we are not talking about the consumption part, we are talking about the killing part. If you find a dead squirrel or deer, it’s not immoral to eat them. Ending someone’s life against their will is though, it doesn’t really matter what your intentions are.

              • essell@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                What if someone ran over that dead deer. They killed it. Is it okay to eat a dead thing if someone else kills it?

                • amzd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Intention is what you’re looking for. It is immoral to intentionally kill someone.

                  • essell@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    I appreciate you sharing your moral perspective with me.

                    Do you have any fringe cases where intentionally killing someone is morally justified?

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                there is no proof nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so we can’t say they have a will to live

                • amzd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  A toddler or a mentally disabled person can’t understand morality. I wouldn’t personally kill and eat those.

          • Hegar@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yeah, it’s such a prevalent attitude but I agree it doesn’t hold water.

            I suspect being unaware of the amount of unnecessary suffering in meat production probably plays a role too.