The chickens weren’t doing the coke. I think.

  • amzd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can’t be immoral.

    Yeah we are not talking about the consumption part, we are talking about the killing part. If you find a dead squirrel or deer, it’s not immoral to eat them. Ending someone’s life against their will is though, it doesn’t really matter what your intentions are.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      What if someone ran over that dead deer. They killed it. Is it okay to eat a dead thing if someone else kills it?

      • amzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Intention is what you’re looking for. It is immoral to intentionally kill someone.

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I appreciate you sharing your moral perspective with me.

          Do you have any fringe cases where intentionally killing someone is morally justified?

          • amzd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            There is probably cases where you could try to morally justify anything (like in a survival situation I guess?) but I personally would try to abstain from killing under any circumstance.

            The morals around eating animals are luckily not that vague. You do not need animal products to live (say all major dietician organizations) so the only reasons people are eating meat is out of habit or for taste. And pleasure does not justify killing a sentient being.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      there is no proof nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so we can’t say they have a will to live

      • amzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        A toddler or a mentally disabled person can’t understand morality. I wouldn’t personally kill and eat those.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          comparing mental disabled people to children is insulting. comparing them to animals is fucking gross.

          • amzd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            I did not compare them, they just have the trait you claimed was the justification for killing animals. Humans are animals and a subset of us have the trait you described. I just pointed out that is not a good justification.