• chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You may not, but the company that packaged the rice did. The cooking instructions on the side of the bag are straight from the FDA. Follow that recipe and you will have rice that is perfectly safe to eat, if slightly over cooked.

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kneecapped to uselessness. Are we really negating the efforts to stifle climate change with a technology that consumes monstrous amounts of energy only to lobotomize it right as it’s about to be useful? Humanity is functionally retarded at this point.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you think AI is supposed to be useful?!

        Its sole purpose is to generate wealth so that stock prices can go up next quarter.

        • servobobo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Doesn’t even need to generate actual wealth, as speculation about future wealth is enough for the market.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I WANT to believe:

          People are threatening lawsuits for every little thing that AI does, whittling it down to uselessness, until it dies and goes away along with all of its energy consumption.

          REALITY:

          Everyone is suing everything possible because $$$, whittling AI down to uselessness, until it sits in the corner providing nothing at all, while stealing and selling all the data it can, and consuming ever more power.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re asking an LLM for advice, then you’re the exact reason they need to be taught to redirect people to actual experts.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I agree with the sentiment but as an autistic person I’d appreciate it if you didn’t use that word

        EDIT: downvotes? Come on, lemmy, what gives? If this had been an anti-trans slur you’d have already grabbed your pitchforks!

        • Kaity@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’ve seen a big uptick in that word usage, I don’t like seeing them and use a replacing extension to intercept and censor them to a more appropriate word, while showing an asterisk so I know it was censored. Now I don’t have to see the word, but I still get to see who is being a bigoted jerk.

          Edit: ya so I guess on lemmy people think it’s cool to throw ableist slurs.

    • Affidavit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can’t help but notice that you’ve cropped out your prompt.

      Played around a bit, and it seems the only way to get a response like yours is to specifically ask for it.

      Honestly, I’m getting pretty sick of these low-effort misinformation posts about LLMs.

      LLMs aren’t perfect, but the amount of nonsensical trash ‘gotchas’ out there is really annoying.

        • Affidavit@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Here’s my first attempt at that prompt using OpenAI’s ChatGPT4. I tested the same prompt using other models as well, (e.g. Llama and Wizard), both gave legitimate responses in the first attempt.

          I get that it’s currently ‘in’ to dis AI, but frankly, it’s pretty disingenuous how every other post about AI I see is blatant misinformation.

          Does AI hallucinate? Hell yes. It makes up shit all the time. Are the responses overly cautious? I’d say they are, but nowhere near as much as people claim. LLMs can be a useful tool. Trusting them blindly would be foolish, but I sincerely doubt that the response you linked was unbiased, either by previous prompts or numerous attempts to ‘reroll’ the response until you got something you wanted to build your own narrative.