Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agoSolid argument.hexbear.netimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down19
arrow-up1101arrow-down1imageSolid argument.hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squaremiz [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70·edit-21 month agoactually you use reproducible tests to prove particular hypotheses you aren’t “proving science” and yeah there are lurking epistemology problems
minus-squarecontext [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·1 month agoit’s too late, for i have already depicted you as the nerd in a scientist halloween costume carrying a beaker full of blue curacao mixed with blue shock mountain dew, and myself as the brawny paper towels guy
minus-squareEnjoyer_of_Games [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 month agoUsing proof to prove is circular reasoning.
actually you use reproducible tests to prove particular hypotheses
you aren’t “proving science” and yeah there are lurking epistemology problems
it’s too late, for i have already depicted you as the nerd in a scientist halloween costume carrying a beaker full of blue curacao mixed with blue shock mountain dew, and myself as the brawny paper towels guy
Using proof to prove is circular reasoning.