TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 22 days agoIf you can't explain why the rule matters, then I won't follow it.lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square192linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIf you can't explain why the rule matters, then I won't follow it.lemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 22 days agomessage-square192linkfedilink
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·21 days agobestie, wtf are you talking about?
minus-squarevoodooattack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·21 days agoNeurodivergence as a concept and how academic psychology perceives it. Everything is a disorder if it doesn’t fit the neurotypical mould. Here’s my argument from Mastodon regarding this: https://mastodon.social/@voodooattack/116564124322479196
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·21 days agoI don’t need to read your argument because I came to the exact same conclusion. I just don’t think madness or insanity are useful terms for understanding psychology, nor is making a distinction between the two really worth the effort.
bestie, wtf are you talking about?
Neurodivergence as a concept and how academic psychology perceives it. Everything is a disorder if it doesn’t fit the neurotypical mould.
Here’s my argument from Mastodon regarding this: https://mastodon.social/@voodooattack/116564124322479196
I don’t need to read your argument because I came to the exact same conclusion. I just don’t think madness or insanity are useful terms for understanding psychology, nor is making a distinction between the two really worth the effort.