• Labna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because, PDF is a container, like a fancy zip, the pictures saved in are kept in their original format, (JPEG, PNG/APNG, AVIF, GIF, JP2k, JPXL, BMP…) unless you add a step to re-compress the all document with image.
      It’s always slightly bigger than the original file.

    • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Webp doesn’t support interlacing, so it’s basically worthless

      In all seriousness, it lacks some features, especially when compared to jxl, that stop it from being able to be a universal image format, which is something that jxl wants to achieve. All hail JPEG XL!

      Check this out to see the differences.

  • UnGlasierteGurke@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    what’s the bottom right format?

    also, avif and webp are both supported by voyager, firefox and chromium (at least for me) but what software actually supports JPEG XL?

    Image Test

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      jxl isn’t supported because google has a near monopoly on the web and has historically been very opposed to it (also they basically control Firefox financially)

      most desktop Linux image processing software supports jxl, but only bespoke browsers like waterfox, safari and ladybird have support for it

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I believe both Firefox and Chromium support JXL now, although they probably need to be enabled as an experimental setting.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t even view OP’s image at all, but it’s just showing as WebP to me? Is Catbox just down?

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      JXL is coming very soon actually to Chrome, Firefox, and any up-to-date PDF viewer (they’re adding it to the format)

      Has support in eog, imageglass, whatever that foss galley app on Android is called, a lot of open source software, anything Apple (safari, iOS everywhere)

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG

    Looks at all those PNGs seems like everyone wants to do that.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jpeg for lossy photos, png for lossless, gif for 256 color animations, what else?

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have a script on my machnie that turns every crap webp that I save from Lemmy into glorious JXL.

    Honestly, Lemmy as an anti-Big System protocol/community idea should serve JXL or APNG by default.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Go with the times, PNG is old as dirt now. Everything supports Webp!

      /edit: the downvotes are hilarious. People have no problem moving on from mp3 to FLAC or so, but somehow they form an emotional attachment to PNG?

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, and webp lossless is really good. JXL lossless is usually better, but either are better than png.

        Random high quality jpeg I found of a screenshot of sheet music:

        Original: 53.3 kb

        JXL: 12.2 kb

        Webp: 25.9 kb

        AVIF: 22.6 kb

        PNG: 47.3 kb

        Most are not anywhere near as favorable, that happened to be the most recent thing in my camera roll. Let me try another:

        Original PNG: 19.0 kb

        JXL: 12.9 kb

        Webp: 15.7 kb

        AVIF: 14.9 kb

        Finally, some larger and photographic content:

        Original PNG: 318 kb

        JXL: 185 kb

        Webp: 247 kb

        AVIF: 201 kb

        Encoder efforts picked to be the highest that would finish in within a few seconds in Image Toolbox on my phone. Webp doesn’t go up as high so it was finishing quicker here, and PNG doesn’t have varying effort afaik

        BTW JXL effort 1 lossless is insanely fast to encode (the order of a gigapixel per second) and also basically always smaller than PNG

    • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t have any issue with the quality

      Yeah cause it’s lossless, which is why the files are also significantly bigger.