• cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      This is a good attitude. The cynicism is well-earned, but ultimately self-defeating. Not all wealthy people are intentionally and actively hostile, and even if they are, sometimes it is effective to turn enemies into allies, maybe just temporary ones, or even just avoid fighting the least rewarding ones at all if it’s not going to cost you anything and lets you combine your forces to focus on the battles that really matter. This is class war, and war calls for strategy. Fight smart and spend our limited resources wisely. Trump and Muskrat are about a million times more direct of a threat to our survival than JB Pritzker or the Waltons. You don’t have to trust any of them, but it’s a strategic blunder to waste time and energy attacking the ones who aren’t attacking us. Don’t depend on them if you don’t have to, but let them try to help, if they can.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think that’s giving her way too much credit… She’ll never be one of us

      But the purity tests are a very real problem. Everyone moving the right direction today gets a pass. When they break off, they’re fair game

      Simple as that, we have to care about winning a hell of a lot more

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Well said. I’ll take this or Gates or Buffett over the Murdochs, Musks, Kochs, Thiels of the world.

      We need all the powerful allies we can get.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        It helps when they say they’ll get rid of their billions after death, like Gates recently said. I don’t particularly trust them to actually do that, although his and Buffetts actions do suggest they don’t just want to hoard wealth like an dragon. They like influence too much to prematurely give up that wealth, though.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          Worth noting that in the case of Gates at least, he has already given away $100 billion and I think committed another $200 over the next 20 years. There is some sound reasoning too that he shouldn’t just dump it all at once, as it’s harder to track corruption.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Is it being a class traitor though? Maybe she just realizes that her dollars are worth more than rubles for a reason, a reason that is very much now in question.

      If anyone should support the rule of law, it’s the billionaires. We should all be on the same side against fascism.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    Trumps tarrif policy is costing her millions a day, I wouldn’t be surprised to see other billionaires come out against Trump, especially if they can hide their real reasons behind things like this.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    If you look up ‘disingenuous’ in the dictionary, there’s a picture of that woman.

    Edited ‘ingenuous’ to ‘disingenuous’. That’s what I actually meant. Bloody proof-read, Almacca!