• shoo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    I’ll be the one to say it: that’s just stupid.

    Lifeless monoculture lawns are as big a waste of resources as car centric infrastructure. Doubly so when it’s in a place where humans can’t even walk on it. Triply so when it’s in a spot where it will gum up and corrode the rails it’s trying to hide.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I can already hear the thumps from a healthy culture of critters getting splatted by the train running through wild shrubs over the rails.

      Seriously, rock ballast has a maintenance cost too. Concrete has higher construction cost but is cheaper to maintain, but creates the heat island effect. Grass can still help with drainage if engineered well, removes the heat island effect, and is not too much more to maintain, since trams are a lower speed and weight class putting less of a load on the rails. Grass is even better than concrete slab for noise dampening. So grass isn’t entirely purposeless and make for a pleasant scenery for people to be near.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyzEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Eh. Not sure native shrubbery would be the best choice in this particular situation.

      It will probably be 80% dandelions and clover in a few years though.

      • DogWater@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        Yes, being concerned about putting creature habitat directly where trains run is trolling.

        it’s about not being stupid. You aren’t gaining anything useful putting grass between the rails of a metro besides potential problems.

        Someone said it’s been done successfully, which is surprising if true, but it’s still not really doing anything.