Hello thanks for visiting my profile.

For any picture posts I make with the [OC] tag, I provide a license for you to use my photo under the terms of CC-BY-SA-4.0. You may DM me for questions.

  • 53 Posts
  • 2.24K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • As a result, democracies across the planet are now threatened by what might be called fossil fuel fascism – an extremist political movement that breaks laws, spreads lies and threatens violence in an increasingly desperate attempt to maintain markets for oil, gas and coal that would otherwise be replaced by cheaper renewables.

    Finally, a more mainstream news org able to put out an opinion properly calling out the US as fascist, and “fossil fuel fascism” is an apt phrase to describe the deliberate effort by Republicans, billionaires and corporations to hinder progress and kill the planet for their own bottom lines.

    I’ve become more emboldened to talk to people about how much better renewables have become and will be… clearly it’s having an effect against trillion dollar corporate and state backed PR campaigns.





  • Maybe I’m not well versed enough in this topic to understand, but I’m having trouble following this person’s argument. First they define materialism, then they talk about how change for the better doesn’t come only once the conditions are perfect, it evolves from a confluence of factors. I get that much. Then they talk about opportunism and how stooping to the lowest common denominator to build a movement leads socialists to fascism how Mussolini rose to power, and compromising their own values voting for the lesser evil (e.g. Hillary Clinton) would lead to fascism. I was confused for the rest of it.

    Where I stand on what I think is the discussion is this: I feel that everyone ideologically should never lose sight of what they want, but to achieve it, it requires a proper transition path to help counter knee-jerk reactions and talking points. Coming at people with uncompromising and very specific jargon and dismissing attempts to dumb down things won’t get you far… simplifying your plan when explaining it isn’t opportunism.

    More of my words on specific cases

    Look at Mamdani, his term so far is described as “sewer socialism”, it’s rooted in socialist ideals but at the end of the day, people want to hear stuff like when New York’s potholes will be filled, and as Mayor he is delivering on that. People don’t care as much about the ideology behind the plan, but that’s how you get them on board with socialism.

    In contrast, Clinton and centrist Democrats want to co-opt the idealistic language but have little interest in following through for the common person and didn’t bother to describe what good it will mean for them. Calling out billionaire/AIPAC backers reduces their influence and should be done, always. However, given a choice between that and a alt-right candidate, it’s clear the internal reform must be done after choosing the lesser evil, and the building toward a revolution has to be done all the time, not just in the months before a general election.

    Another example is Peter Magyar in Hungary. Left parties and voters voted for him, despite still being right-wing, to reverse the corruption and reform the constitution so that a democratic left or socialist party can have a chance in any future Hungarian election, which was virtually impossible before.













  • I would like us to be part of a Schengen Area and other mutual recognition to make it easier to travel and get work permits between Canada and EU nations.

    We need to start accepting ISO/EN standards as an alternative option to UL and American standards.

    In terms of becoming an EU member state, I’m open to it but don’t rush us to the front of the line. Ukraine, Morocco, Algiers and other north African countries, Norway, Balkans, etc., if any of them have put official Expressions of Interest they should be considered before us.