Joe Biden regrets having pulled out of this year’s presidential race and believes he would have defeated Donald Trump in last month’s election – despite negative poll indications, White House sources have said.

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland as attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection while presiding over a justice department that aggressively prosecuted Biden’s son Hunter.

With just more than three weeks of his single-term presidency remaining, Biden’s reported rueful reflections are revealed in a Washington Post profile that contains the clearest signs yet that he thinks he erred in withdrawing his candidacy in July after a woeful debate performance against his rival for the White House, Trump, the previous month.

    • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I mean he might have, a lot of people that voted for Biden in 2020 did not vote for Kamala in 2024 for various reasons. Trump did only very slightly better in 2024 than be did in 2020. Would the people who stayed home and didn’t vote for Kamala have gotten out and voted for Biden? Maybe. If anything though Biden should have dropped out sooner or not ran at all, the DNC should have fielded better candidates, instead they spent 4 years (longer) trying to strangle any progressives before they could become feasible candidates.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        The Joe Biden who showed up in 2020 would have beaten Trump. Joe Biden in 2024 is not the same guy.

        The only real asset Joe had over Kamala, though, is a penis. For some voters, though, that’s enough to make them pick one and not the other.

  • WilderSeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    He likely would not have won. It surprises me how discrepancies in this election haven’t been questioned, but at this point it may not matter. As for his choice of Merrick Garland. Yeah, that and not really doing much about unseating DeJoy was a mistake.

  • vikingr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    I just don’t understand why Biden’s family and those closest to him wouldn’t have taken the time to be like “Joe, just shut your mouth. Cement your legacy as one of the best Presidents the USA has ever had, make some shit for Donald harder on the way out, and enjoy retirement.”

    Instead he’s showing his whole ass. And for what? Once real history gets memory-holed by the fascists none of his whining matters anyway. He could have done a lot of good on his way out.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Biden: “I’m a one term president, stability in crisis.”

    Biden: “I don’t care, fuck it, you only live once, I’m running again!”

    People: “You said you were a one term canidate, you’re old, you didn’t do COVID well, you broke up strikes, you aren’t protecting women’s rights, trans people are under attack, Mexicans are still in cages at the border, Ukraine could use more help, you’re doing a bad job at stopping weapons to Israel, rent is gone up, inflation is stopped bu not down, groceries are still expensive…”

    Biden: “Shut up Jack, check this out!”

    [“Primaries” give him the win, flops at debate, hands things to Harris]

    Biden: “Well I did what I could do. …I would have won anyways, why be consistant with what I say and do? Now lemme pardon my son after I said I wouldn’t.”

    • Yewb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Of all things the pardon of his son is reasonable that guy had a whole culture of assholes trying to find anything to get him in jail just to hurt Biden.

      Then we find out the basis of the entire hunter controversy was a lie and the guy admitted it was a lie after the election.

      So they ended up getting for like tax evasion I would be willing to bet 90% of congress would be guilty of similar things if brought under the same scrutiny.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      It’s been absolutely appalling how long it has taken to prosecute Trump.
      Many cases should have been ready the second he was no-longer president.
      All the lame considerations about looks and not getting involved is idiotic. if the politicians in power don’t work to defend democracy, who else should?
      The left have been screaming for Democrats to wake up for more than a decade, but they behave like a party with dementia that doesn’t understand what’s going on around them.
      As AOC has stated multiple times, people will come to vote for you, if you give them a good enough reason for it. Harris was the better more moderate candidate. But I think most Americans want more, they want real change. Like better healthcare, environment protection, democracy etc.
      Preventing a fascist narcissist becoming president apparently wasn’t enough?!

      But maybe I’m wrong, maybe the majority of Americans prefer to live with the danger of not receiving healthcare, and the danger of being financially ruined by healthcare bills. Rather than living in a “socialist hellhole” where society actually care about the citizens?

      The number one cause for bankruptcies in USA is healthcare bills.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Remember how there was already a document produced by a special prosecutor that said there were crimes committed but a sitting president couldn’t be prosecuted? Just fucking memory holed by Garland’s DOJ. He literally could have taken that up the day he was confirmed.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          No, he literally said his mistake was selecting Garland. There were many other mistakes, and opportunities for him to push Garland even after he had been selected.

          That’s the taking responsibility equivalent of “I’m sorry you feel that way” apology.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    You can go back and look at Pew polling or Gallup polling. The top concern for people who voted Trump was the economy. Within that, the aspect that they were most concerned about was prices. That is, people were very unhappy about inflation. There was a lot of inflation relative to normal US levels under Biden.

    The Trump administration also adopted inflationary policy. And doing so was generally considered desirable by economists; having inflation is preferable to recession in terms of the impact on a country, and COVID-19 was going to produce some level of economic disruption. But that doesn’t change the fact that the public doesn’t view inflation in that way; it’s very unpopular with the public, and past polling has shown that the public, in the US and elsewhere, is more upset about having inflation than a recession.

    https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c8881/c8881.pdf

    The results show that most people in all countries would choose low inflation even if it meant that millions more people would be unemployed.

    In general, the American public also attributes short-term aspects of the economy directly to the President.

    The Trump campaign also worked to drive those concerns and associate them with the Biden administration.

    Benefitting from mis-attribution of economic behavior and policy is not unique to the Republicans. Clinton benefited from it; the “it’s the economy, stupid” slogan played off public concern about economic policy where there probably wasn’t much to blame Bush for, but the public was still upset about it. To some extent, it winds up being luck of the draw; if the economy is growing when you’re President, people tend to credit you for it, whether you really deserve credit or not, and if it’s contracting, people tend to blame you for it, again whether you really deserve blame or not. They don’t go digging through data or reading much about where policy originated.

    That’s been a property of American elections for some time.

    If you want to change that, you have a hard communications problem.

    My guess is that neither Biden nor Harris was going to solve that communication problem, fundamentally change that aspect of electoral politics, and I think that unless they managed to pull some very large rabbit out of the hat, that was going to dominate the election.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      To me, there are a couple problems of perception that gave Biden/Harris a huge uphill battle in the election that they didn’t need to have.

      Biden actually did a ton to address problems of inequality and income in America. He worked harder on it than any president since Johnson at least, and scored some huge successes driving up low-income wages and strengthening unions. But, he didn’t do it in ways that were visible to the average American, I think because he’s so far removed from the present-day average American that he genuinely didn’t realize how invisible a lot of his reforms would turn out to be.

      His two huge mistakes were:

      • Talking about, and letting people in his adminstration talk about, inflation, in terms of “how much have prices gone up this year?” He bragged about getting inflation back down, which speaking from an economist’s point of view is accurate. But things are still expensive. To the average American, “getting inflation back down” would have meant that eggs go back down to costing what they used to cost. He could have gotten away with half as much gains on wages, but taking strong action to bring down grocery prices and rent prices. People respond to how much stuff costs, even if they’re making 20% more than they used to a year before.
      • Focusing all his wage efforts on people who are in the “W-2 economy,” even at a low level. The biggest economic victims in the country are undocumented people, people driving Uber, people working at Wal-mart being kept just barely under full-time employment, all of whose rent goes up every year to match anything they’re gaining. People are being squeezed out of the full-time-job-having economy steadily more and more every year and into the desperation economy. I know he did the Climate Corps, but something more like the CCC or WPA, giving real full-time working jobs that can pay a decent income on a massive scale, would have been better than looking out for people who already have a W-2 union job having their union more effectively able to fight for them.

      And then, also, letting Merrick Garland twiddle his thumbs for four years like the cowardly lump that he is. I think history will look back on this past few years of slow-walking the Trump prosecutions as a massive error that led to untold misery and bloodshed. Honestly, even if he fucked up everything else and lost the 2024 election, if he had simply taken the fire on the roof as an urgent problem that needs all hands on deck, instead of one more renovation project that needs to wait its turn until it comes up in the agenda, it would have been better.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    His own staff had data that showed he would have lost even more electoral votes, giving Trump 400 instead of the 312. Biden is not aware of this data though. Kind of makes you think his staff is still heavily censoring what he sees.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    For an ancient venal egotist like Joe, the fact that Kamala lost is close to a best case scenario. He would’ve gotten completely waxed if he had stayed in… but now he gets to say he was forced aside by the party leaders (Pelosi, the Obamas etc.) and that is completely verifiably true, but he also gets to claim he totally would’ve won, which is very likely not true, but now we will never know.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Mr. I’m only gonna be a one term President seems to have a short memory, yet again.

    Him and his staff misled and dragged their feet about his intentions early in then he went full out with ‘no I’m gonna run fuck you all’ and it turned into a disaster.

    This is just one of the problems with the current Democratic Party. No one will work with and groom the upcoming young members to take control. The older party members literally do not have a clue what it means to step aside for the good of the party and the good of the country.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I have a fun test for you, it will inform you if your information ecosystem is informing you or misinforming you

      Mr. I’m only gonna be a one term President seems to have a short memory, yet again.

      You clearly remember this as a big promise during Biden’s 2020 campaign - but can you actually find evidence of him saying this, ever?

      Can you find anything official - with a name attached to it - of the Biden campaign saying anything about only serving for one term?

      • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Google gives a bunch of examples. Did he actually say it to the press? Perhaps not. Was it discussed and was his age recognized as a liability within his campaign in 2020? Absolutely yes.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          They all, all reference the exact same quote each article.

          “If Biden is elected,” a prominent adviser to the campaign said, “he’s going to be 82 years old in four years and he won’t be running for reelection.”

          The adviser argued that public acknowledgment of that reality could help Biden mollify younger voters, especially on the left, who are unexcited by his candidacy and fear that his nomination would serve as an eight-year roadblock to the next generation of Democrats.

          By signaling that he will serve just one term and choosing a running mate and Cabinet that is young and diverse, Biden could offer himself to the Democratic primary electorate as the candidate best suited to defeat Trump as well as the candidate who can usher into power the party’s fresh faces.

          None of that was official, it was all just the campaign’s attempt to shore up an issue they had without an actual commitment and you fell for it.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            None of that was official, it was all just the campaign’s attempt to shore up an issue they had without an actual commitment and you fell for it.

            That’s not a failure of the media, that’s a deception by the campaign. Unless you think the media lied about a prominent advisor saying that, they did their job.

            If they were off the reservation, there should have been a firing, but just because they’re putting out statements through unofficial side channels doesn’t make it not a message from the campaign.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              off the reservation

              that phrase was used to describe native americans who ventured outside of the confines of the reservations they had been forced into. You can imagine what happened to them if caught. That phrase has a dark, dark, history.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Hey, hey. Rude of you to call the guy who was supposed to save us from another 4 years of Trump but then delivered it anyways a failure. All he did was tread water for 4 years and then hang on to power way too long, simultaneously tanking his own campaign, and making it much more difficult for someone to follow him.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Rude of you to call the guy who was supposed to save us from another 4 years of Trump but then delivered it anyways a failure.

        Biden literally kept a lot of Trump’s policies in place, kept his tax cuts in place, and did things Trump was considering despite public outcry, like limiting COVID protections and telling the CDC to stop covering it.