• Pissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Generally I think people that use Linux on their home PCs are more likely to have stuff like multiple screens or loads of gadgets attached to their computer. A lot of Linux users think it’s really cool or like to imagine themselves as someone that does things like lots of complicated data analysis or being an “epic hacker” in their spare time at home. Extra shit on your desk can be genuinely useful if you actually do those kinds of things and add to the aesthetic if you like them.

  • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    And… they’re basically all correct. Linux does run on all sort of machines, even really ancient ones. It has a solid command line environment, or rather lots of them. And it’s astounding powerful. Windows does still blue screen, is currently the best place for gaming, and wow is MS fucking you with Win11. Macs can have a cool setup, are really simplified for most users and expensive.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Macs excel in multimedia creation. It’s not just a cool setup. Yes, I’m prepared for the inevitable downvotes.

      • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think I’ll ever be a Mac user but I’ve seen how fast these newer MacBooks edit video on battery power without breaking a sweat (and without eating through the battery).

        People focus on “software magic” with Apple but the M chips are serious hardware that a lot of us don’t take seriously because the company that killed the iPod made them.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What’s interesting is the Apple CoreAudio system on iOS and macOS is as good as it is from their experience developing the iPod. For years after the iPod was discontinued, audiophiles were paying top dollar for used iPod Classics, just for the high quality DAC. The low-latency and high quality of CoreAudio is one of the reasons Pro Tools works better on Mac than on Windows.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah, more software was written for the more user-friendly computers with the (generally) less-technical userbase.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, the people at Pixar have no clue how to use a computer. Lol

          In all seriousness, even the same media software, like Pro Tools, is more versatile on Mac than on Windows. I can say that with first-hand experience.

          The “dumbed-down” Apple device is the iPhone. You get admin privileges on MacOS like a big boy. You can use bash or zsh commands in Terminal all you want.

          • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yeah, the people at Pixar have no clue how to use a computer. Lol

            Do you really expect their artists to be IT experts? You seem to be stuck in the early 90s mindset when “knowing how to use a computer” covered all disciplines.

          • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You get admin privileges on MacOS like a big boy. You can use bash or zsh commands in Terminal all you want.

            Cool. So try updating to a version of Bash from the last 15 years, because the pre-installed one is Bash 3, because Bash 4 and 5 are under the GPLv3 license, which Apple won’t comply with.

            …ah, no, you can’t update the pre-installed Bash, because it’s on a section of the file system that is read-only even with admin access. You can install Bash 5 as a separate shell, and use that as your default terminal shell, but any scripts written with the standard #!/bin/bash instead of the more flexible #!/usr/bin/env bash will still use Bash 3.

            This “handholding” (or really, a safety net) is arguably a good thing, or at least a positive tradeoff; but you can’t claim it doesn’t exist.

              • computergeek125@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                If it’s anything like when I used a Mac regularly 7y ago, Homebrew doesn’t install to /bin, it installs to /usr/local/bin, which only works for scripts that use env in their shell “marker” (if you don’t call it directly with the shell). You’re just putting a higher bash in the path, not truly updating the one that comes with the system.

                • paperplane@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  That’s mostly still true, with the small caveat that the default prefix on arm64 macOS is /opt/homebrew rather than /usr/local, so you might have to add it explicitly to your PATH

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Ok, yeah, I can see that there would be times this could matter but like 90% of the time this wouldn’t have mattered for my use case afaik. I didn’t realize you couldn’t backup the old copy in /bin and symlink to the brew one from there. In fact I thought I did do that long ago.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I agree it’s not as limitless as Linux, but there’s plenty of room for advanced users.

              I’ve never needed to use a newer version of Bash. What is an example of something one couldn’t do with Bash 3 or zsh?

              • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s not so much a problem of there being things you “can’t do” in other shells or older Bash, as that it breaks existing shell scripts, which is frustrating.

              • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I get that this is an Apples to Oranges comparison, but Powershell 7 is way easier to use than the default Windows Powershell because of autocomplete. I imagine that newer versions of Bash have made improvements that are similarly powerful.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Did you miss the word “generally?”

            Having a familiar console is nice, but you still can’t truly tinker with all the nuts and bolts.

  • gjoel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    To me, a Linux user, Apple is more of a jail or a pusher. I don’t want to use it because of lock in. Oh, you have an iPod? It’s much better with a Mac. An iPhone? All your friends should also have it, and now we have this special app you can only use properly with other apple users.

    No thanks.

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The funny thing about apple is just how far they’ve moved away from Jobs’ “vision”.

      It was clearly evident when they released the Apple Pencil. Jobs hated Stylus’. one of the reasons he killed the newton, and a reason why the iphone/ipad never originally had one as he was quoted as saying “why would I need a stylus? I have 5 of them on my hand”

      I mean Apple is like a cult that worship a dead god who would burn current Apple to the ground and start over if he came back.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Steve jobs also hated keyboards, or at least all the F1-12 keys because “nobody needs them”

        About the “5 stylus on my hand”, it really feels like he only ever cared about the lowest common denominator when it came to usability and function. Yes, you have 5 fingers, but to this day fingers lack precision on touch screens, while a pencil stylus is as precise as it can get.

        • Dave.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Jobs also believed that 3.5" was the perfect touchscreen size for the human hand, neglecting the fact that (a) the human hand size varies drastically and (b) people are willing to trade ergonomic perfection for more screen estate because it’s more usable that way.

        • The function keys allow you to access extra features or shortcuts in programs that most people don’t ever use or don’t know might make them slightly quicker if they use the program a lot.

          Steve Jobs only seemed to believe in supporting input methods he thought seemed most convenient for most people. Anything else was needlessly complicated and a waste of space. Some of his ideas about that come across as unusual, especially when things like space aren’t as limited.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I always thought the Nintendo DS Lite looked like something Apple manufactured.

        Now that I think about it, it’s kinda ironic because Steve Jobs hates the stylus.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Apple looks more like a cult, similar to Scientology. Linux user as well.

      • lastweakness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Linux is a cult with an exit, apple is a cult that most don’t acknowledge as a cult and there’s no real exit

            • palordrolap@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Was going to say that I don’t have the energy to be passionate about anything these days, but then I realised I’m quite happy - almost passionate, you might say - to turn that dispassion towards large organisations like Microsoft.

              Buy our products!

              “No.”

  • dwindling7373@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Memes came and go and this picture is still somehow relevant. How old is it? I wouldn’t be surprised if it was 10+ years!

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lets be real, we all know the Linux perception is true

    (Windows however is the child and the bluescreen as well XD)

  • Hackworth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Just looking at the mental space of the three fanboy types… Mac seems the chilliest to hang with.

    e: lol, case in point

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Especially since it looks like it has an actual graphics tablet attached to it. Granted, it’s probably just aa resistive panel with no display behind it, but still!