I’m not making a larger claim here, I’m just asking the vegetarians to explain the logic of their belief.

It sounds like now you’re saying that you want to reduce pain rather than the killing of intelligent/conscious life.

In that case would you be OK with slaughterhouses if they treated the animals humanely and killed them as quickly as possible before they could feel significant pain?

You’re so right. I guess it doesn’t matter what happens between now and the inevitable future. -_-

It is in my country.

Did you read the comment I replied to?

For me there’s no morals tied to the level of consciousness. That allows for cherry picking.

No I wouldn’t. But I would kill and eat an insect, fish, or bird.

Ok but plants are also living beings so you should not eat them by your rule.

How is it not? The most popular GPT models are trained on copyrighted works.

AI generated?

don’t demonize tools, demonize what people do with the tools that’s damaging

Depends on what tool you’re talking about.

Sadly in this case the tool, in its product form, is already in breach of a moral principle, because it is a derivative work and stealing labor without consent.

If you are referring to the GPT algorithms, that’s more subtle. We need to figure out how to regulate it better.

Is your belief based on an animal’s capacity for consciousness? If so do you think all animals, regardless of their intelligence, deserve the right to not be eaten? Where would you draw the line?

I’ll use it after they fix https://github.com/ente-io/ente/issues/1166

Oh. There goes all my free time again?

What if one day you woke up and your nipples were completely gone like no scars or anything just flat skin and then once you leave your room you find out your dad died last night and several days later you find out that your entire life he had been sneaking in your room while you slept and sucking on your chest to make two gigantic hickeys where your nipples should be because you were born without them not for any sexual reason just so you would fit in…

Agreed. Take a look at the cachestat tool to measure how well the page cache is working for cargo builds.

https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2014-12-31/linux-page-cache-hit-ratio.html

I would take a look at LEAN4.

https://lean-lang.org/functional_programming_in_lean/

I definitely cannot get behind the “no recursion” rule. There are plenty of algorithms where the iterative equivalent is significantly harder and less natural. For example, post-order DFS.

I guess maybe when lives depend on it. But they should be testing and fuzzing their code anyway, right?

EDIT: I can’t even find in the NASA PDF where it mentions recursion.

Schedule it in the morning then.

We also have I2P now.

This would be more believable if Elon paid his cloud bills.

This is so fucking cringe. Give the money away and do it all over again if that’s what makes you happy.