driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoanswer = sum(n) / len(n)lemmy.eco.brexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down11
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkanswer = sum(n) / len(n)lemmy.eco.brdriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoThe meme would work just the same with the “machine learning” label replaced with “human cognition.”
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoIf by “human cognition” you mean "tens of millions of improvised people manually checking and labeling images and text so that the AI can pretend to exist," then yes. If you mean “it’s a living, thinking being,” then no.
minus-squareSchmeckinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoMy dude it’s math all the way down. Brains are not magic.
minus-squarePiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoThere’s a lot we understand about the brain, but there is so much more we dont understand about the brain and “awareness” in general. It may not be magic, but it certainly isnt 100% understood.
minus-squarenBodyProblem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoWe don’t need to understand cognition, nor for it to work the same as machine learning models, to say it’s essentially a statistical model It’s enough to say that cognition is a black box process that takes sensory inputs to grow and learn, producing outputs like muscle commands.
minus-square0xD@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoYou can abstract everything down to that level, doesn’t make it any more right.
The meme would work just the same with the “machine learning” label replaced with “human cognition.”
If by “human cognition” you mean "tens of millions of improvised people manually checking and labeling images and text so that the AI can pretend to exist," then yes.
If you mean “it’s a living, thinking being,” then no.
My dude it’s math all the way down. Brains are not magic.
There’s a lot we understand about the brain, but there is so much more we dont understand about the brain and “awareness” in general. It may not be magic, but it certainly isnt 100% understood.
We don’t need to understand cognition, nor for it to work the same as machine learning models, to say it’s essentially a statistical model
It’s enough to say that cognition is a black box process that takes sensory inputs to grow and learn, producing outputs like muscle commands.
You can abstract everything down to that level, doesn’t make it any more right.