• neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Here I was thinking “oh please tell me she didn’t lose to a regressive GOP tool” but seing who she actually lost to absolutely made my day.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 months ago

      The keyword here is “Primary”; in a Primary election, you are running against one or more candidates from your own party, and if you win, your name goes onto the General ballot.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          As someone else commented, the incumbent won their last election 87%-13% to a libertarian in a race where the GOP didn’t run a candidate.

          I don’t think there’s much risk of that, thankfully.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why the Hell was the Democrat in a district like that anything less than super-progressive to begin with?

            • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Stealth Republican. I can’t say this for sure but, since the district leans so far left that the Republicans didn’t even run a candidate last time, this individual probably just ran as a Democrat even though she intended to support Republican positions once elected. Campaign as if you have the same ideals as the voters, then turn coat once you’re sworn in. It’s been done before.