The 1989 Belgian techno anthem Pump Up the Jam.
- 17 Posts
- 952 Comments
neidu2@feddit.nlto okmatewanker@feddit.uk•luv me iron bru, 'ate black puddin, simple asEnglish1·8 months agoFuck you, more Pinnekjøtt and Fårikål for me
Highest to lowest. I edited it into the comment.
Interesting tidbit: from left to right, these are ordered by the efficiency of the oxygen transportation, highest to lowest.
Blue blood may be cool, but red blood is better for you.
neidu2@feddit.nlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Linux Sys Admins, do you work on Linux or Windows office laptops?3·8 months agoPrevious job: Windows, because it was a company issued laptop. Plus a lot of the company was built around the MS ecosystem.
Current job: Linux, because I got to keep the perfectly decent Dell laptop when I left. I wanted to make sure I purged everything, so it’s running LMDE now. Plus, there’s not much outlook and teams stuff that I have to use.
I blame Daniel
neidu2@feddit.nlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Store making me feel like an outcast because of privacy concerns11·8 months agoI realized a few years ago that my GF inadvertently solved this issue for me: She likes registering for anything that provides a discount, so I use her phone number.
“Are you a member?”
“Nope, but my GF probably is…”, and 90% of the time I am correct.
neidu2@feddit.nlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Noob question about hosting multiple services on one server and DNS records5·8 months agoSome surface-level info while I’m waiting for my kids to finish the evening ritual: No need for an extra IP or VPS. You can host them all on the same IP and machine, provided there aren’t any conflicting port assignments.
In the DNS server, you can enter the various subdomains as CNAME pointing to the A record. The server-software is configured with which hostname it should operate as (For example, HTTP/1.1 has a Host-specification in the initial request, so that one server can host multiple domains on the same IP)
It should be noted that mail servers are indicated by an MX-record. And mailservers should also have a TXT record (SPF record) as part of spam prevention - some SMTP servers query this to ensure that your e-mail actually comes from you and not from someone spoofing the domain.
I used to have a zone file that did roughly what you’re trying to do, bit sadly I don’t have it anymore. But as you have DNS up and running, I’m sure you’ll be able to figure out the rest through checking some examples.
I half-baked an example zone file for you. I haven’t tested it, though. It assumes the domain of blargh.com being hosted from an IP of 123.123.123.123:
$TTL 86400 @ IN SOA ns1.blargh.com. admin.blargh.com. ( 2024102102 ; Serial (incremented) 3600 ; Refresh 1800 ; Retry 1209600 ; Expire 86400 ; Minimum TTL ) ; Name servers @ IN NS ns1.blargh.com. @ IN NS ns2.blargh.com. ; A Records @ IN A 123.123.123.123 ns1 IN A 123.123.123.123 ns2 IN A 123.123.123.123 ; CNAME Records mail IN CNAME blargh.com. mastodon IN CNAME blargh.com. matrix IN CNAME blargh.com. ; MX Records @ IN MX 10 mail.blargh.com. ; TXT/SPF Record @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx ~all"
Oh, and some tips:
- Do not enable SMTP-relay on your SMTP server. This opens you up to abuse, and you (probably) don’t need it.
- Your DNS server should only talk to strangers about queries about your domain. Otherwise you might be part of a DNS amplification attack.
- I have a personal preference for imap.blargh.com or pop3.blargh.com, combined with smtp.blargh.com, as it makes it easier to deduct the protocol, if you’re not supporting imap and pop3. I don’t think anyone else but me care, though.
I’m not sure I’d be comfortable with my landlord harvesting my vomit as rent.
“I’m eating it, I promise it’s not a sex thing.”
🎶 Freedom from the ass of doom is the treasure you will win 🎶
That’s for mobniks and the like. The prize offered isn’t large enough for the ones enabling the war to defect - They only have incentives to keep on keeping on and avoiding windows.
Yup. Large creatures knows better than to wear stripes.
Your cat hears the promises of a rooster coming and knows for sure he’s gonna die. She’s waiting to score a kill.
neidu2@feddit.nlto Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.world•To the surprise of no one, this was a fucking lie16·8 months agoAnd the far right seem much easier to upset. “Oh no, a trans person held a beer can!”
neidu2@feddit.nlMto NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works•Is my Start Up idea illegal?English4·8 months agoI have a vague memory from the late 90’s during the dotcom bubble where there was this site where you could pay, log in, remotely control an actuated hunting rifle, and shoot an animal. It was deemed legal as it was legal where the actual shot was fired.
By the same logic I would think this idea would be legal as well.
Who can forget his 90s smash hit “Hussein in the membraine”
neidu2@feddit.nlto World News@lemmy.world•“A woman’s purpose is to procreate" -PutinEnglish2·9 months agoContrary to popular belief, you are actually factually spot on. It is all described in detail in soviet-era files, locked away.
Even JD Vance confirms this, ans I challenge FSB to release any documentation that disputes it.
Inside you there are two wolves; Neither is alpha, beta, sigma or any of the other Greek letters, because wolves only behave that way in captivity. These aren’t in captivity. They’re feasting on you, as you were their prey.
And the study was even proven wrong in the 17th century. A finite amount of monkeys already produced Shakespeare in a finite amount of time; it took roughly 55 million years.
Source: Primates show up in the fossil records, dating to roughly 55mill years. And Shakespeare’s complete works were most likely completed by William Shakespeare, a famous decendant of said primates.