• Duranie@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yep, that and the inconsistencies of timing. Some areas yellow are very long, some are short, and some seen to vary within the “allowable range.” In other words, encouraging people to slam on the brakes because God only knows when the lights will change.

    I hate the cameras (I spend most of my work day driving city/suburban areas) and think that if they’re going to exist, they should have longer yellows to give more opportunity for drivers not to panic between getting ticketed or rear ended.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You seem to be arguing that the cameras are making it less safe by causing drivers to slam on their brakes. Can you point me to any evidence that they are making it less safe? Everything I’ve read has been unequivocal that these reduce risky driving behaviors and have increase safety.

      • Duranie@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I read up on it a few years back. Long story short, the number of “T-bone” type accidents where the side of the car gets hit decreased, while the number of people getting rear ended significantly increased (allowing that some rear end collisions also go unreported due to lower degrees of damage.)

        There was a whole rethink of the use/benefits and disabling/not installing them further, but I can’t remember the outcome.

        Like I said, I spend a lot of time driving, so forgive me for not pulling sources in the middle of my work day. Gotta drive to the next patient’s house lol.