In a nod to labor unions, President Joe Biden is moving to boost wages for construction workers on projects paid for with federal funding, a step that would appeal to a key constituency ahead of next year’s presidential election and potentially shrink the pay gap between northern and southern states.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but ADVERTISE it. Sell your accomplishments because lord knows, no one else will. The news media has been actively attacking stuff that Biden has done while giving Trump one free-pass after another. The news media is not on our side. So if they won’t celebrate Democratic wins, Democrats need to, and turn it into a big deal.

      • Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        IBEW Local 26 member here. Journeyman Electrical Foreman.

        Most states with strong union participation are blue states. Many red states are against unions.

        I get where you are coming from, but especially considering construction workers are 3% of the workforce in America, one can’t expect my idiot coworkers to have much of an impact.

        Also, Biden or Trump, I don’t care. I don’t trust any of these rich people in politics. They are all crooks, IMHO.

          • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The other thinks it’s important to get along with the book burners. They think the book burners are decent people who are just misguided on a few issues. They act like civil debate will solve all problems.

        • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t discount yourself or your coworkers - shifting the votes of 3% of Americans could have changed the election results of almost every presidential election since 1992 if they went from the winning candidate to the losing candidate.

          The top dogs being crooks sucks, but shouldn’t mean that the only acceptable response is political apathy - not doing anything is functionally equivalent to acceptance of the status quo.

            • PunnyName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once we have ranked voting, that would work.

              Otherwise it’s naive to think that vote does anything to help you or yours.

            • yata@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So in practice you are handing your vote to the GOP and Trump. Congratulations on having been convinced by the “apathetic” narrative into handing power over to the GOP.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reagan tried to kill the Unions. After boasting about being head of Screen Actors Guild.

          There’s a difference.

        • Dave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Big difference with Trump is that a win in 2024 will be the end of democracy in USA.

          I’m not being dramatic: He’ll pardon himself for everything (as already established) and then use stacked supreme court / police / military / mob rule to prevent himself being removed again.

      • gardylou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, but how? How are democrats supposed to pentrated the algorithmically curated propaganda feeds of the right, or otherwise get fair coverage in biased spaces? I’m all for celebrating the many good things the Biden administration has done, but I don’t know a plan to connect this information to the voters who need to be exposed to it most.

        • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Left loves to pretend that they are so media savvy. That they know all the trends and how to navigate the social media wilderness and what is happening out there. Clearly they don’t or else they should leverage that supposed knowledge to market their ideas to the entire nation.

          In short, what should Democrats be doing? The exact OPPOSITE of what they are doing now.

          Actually celebrate their wins. I know part of why they don’t is pure cluelessness - they legitimately think that average Joes will find out about these programs on their own. They don’t. Average voters have no idea of what happens in Washington.

          Part of it is because Democrats are meek. God forbid they ever go on the offensive and get the media’s attention on topics.

          Lastly, part of it is typical “liberal guilt”. The incredibly annoying attitude that some have that god forbid we celebrate anything good, because there might be some one else who isn’t doing so well. It brings down everyone’s mood and makes it so that Democrats are always looking to the bad side of even positive news. Biden tomorrow could announce that nuclear fussion is viable and the country will have free energy, and there will be some on the Left who will complain that fission might negatively impact the northern tree bullfrog or some other meaningless bullshit like that.